by whufc » Tue May 26, 2009 8:35 pm
by Wedgie » Tue May 26, 2009 9:32 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by PhilH » Tue May 26, 2009 9:49 pm
by am Bays » Tue May 26, 2009 9:51 pm
by PhilH » Tue May 26, 2009 11:03 pm
by Hazydog » Wed May 27, 2009 12:27 am
by whufc » Wed May 27, 2009 9:29 am
Hazydog wrote:It surprises me that clubs are not a bit more proactive filling in gaps where in instances like this week, some clubs effectively have 2 byes in a row. Surely it wouldnt cost that much to nip interstate for a mid season trial? One bye a year is probably handy to rest the squad - but I reckon Teams can lose momentum when they have a couple of weeks off within a short period of time. (ie South have the week off for the State Game, play this week & then have a bye the week after.)
For example, if the Dogs played a WAFL club at Elizabeth mid season (when they both had a bye) I reckon they would attract 2000-3000 which surely would cover costs for both sides?
by dedja » Wed May 27, 2009 10:02 am
Hazydog wrote:It surprises me that clubs are not a bit more proactive filling in gaps where in instances like this week, some clubs effectively have 2 byes in a row. Surely it wouldnt cost that much to nip interstate for a mid season trial? One bye a year is probably handy to rest the squad - but I reckon Teams can lose momentum when they have a couple of weeks off within a short period of time. (ie South have the week off for the State Game, play this week & then have a bye the week after.)
For example, if the Dogs played a WAFL club at Elizabeth mid season (when they both had a bye) I reckon they would attract 2000-3000 which surely would cover costs for both sides?
by Wedgie » Wed May 27, 2009 10:22 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Big Phil » Wed May 27, 2009 10:41 am
Wedgie wrote:North played a trial against the state under 18 side a couple of weeks ago to help fill in our extended gap.
We lost.
by Sojourner » Wed May 27, 2009 11:31 am
whufc wrote:Also over time if there was a clear differnece in standard between the leagues im sure one team especially if they were going well in there league would not wanna come over and get pumped by 10 goals.
by whufc » Wed May 27, 2009 6:53 pm
Sojourner wrote:whufc wrote:Also over time if there was a clear differnece in standard between the leagues im sure one team especially if they were going well in there league would not wanna come over and get pumped by 10 goals.
Imagine what would be said on this forum if such a match was held and Subiaco pumped Central by 10 goals - maybe that is what they are afraid of!
by eaglehaslanded » Wed May 27, 2009 7:12 pm
by baysman » Wed May 27, 2009 11:17 pm
by Big Phil » Thu May 28, 2009 12:55 am
baysman wrote:An interesting idea. I'd like to see The Bays play the WAFL's 2009 Premiers![]()
![]()
by baysman » Thu May 28, 2009 7:03 pm
by Big Phil » Thu May 28, 2009 7:58 pm
baysman wrote:Ooops.....apologies. I just didn't know that Centrals have already been given the Premiership Cup in May
by EasyE » Fri May 29, 2009 2:10 am
Big Phil wrote:baysman wrote:Ooops.....apologies. I just didn't know that Centrals have already been given the Premiership Cup in May
They haven't, I just said that based on what a lot of others are saying, we may as well just give it to them now.
Of course, there is a long way to go and I think there are possibly 4 teams that could face off in the big one and win it.
by Sojourner » Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:59 pm
by Big Phil » Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:29 pm
Sojourner wrote:Central District vs Swan Districts - Swans by 14pts for mine.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |