Groover wrote:Got 1980 this week with 3 Donuts!
Who is leading in your comp Groover?
by Browny25 » Wed May 13, 2009 9:57 am
Groover wrote:Got 1980 this week with 3 Donuts!
by Swooper16 » Fri May 15, 2009 11:26 am
by silicone skyline » Fri May 15, 2009 11:39 am
by Swooper16 » Fri May 15, 2009 12:19 pm
by Zelezny Chucks » Fri May 15, 2009 1:46 pm
silicone skyline wrote:I think it's a precautionary emergency. He would play if fully fit. Might be a test. Nahas shouldn't get dropped.
What did Jordan McMahon ever do wrong? I thought he has had a good season to date.
Good to see Cotchin back plus Raines named. Hope he can stay fit.
I'm tipping the Tigers this week. No Salopek leaves Port badly exposed at the hard ball with only Boak the real in and under player.
by nuggety goodness » Fri May 15, 2009 2:22 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:silicone skyline wrote:I think it's a precautionary emergency. He would play if fully fit. Might be a test. Nahas shouldn't get dropped.
What did Jordan McMahon ever do wrong? I thought he has had a good season to date.
Good to see Cotchin back plus Raines named. Hope he can stay fit.
I'm tipping the Tigers this week. No Salopek leaves Port badly exposed at the hard ball with only Boak the real in and under player.
think they said McMahon's main problem is he burns the ball too much which I tend to agree with gets it and breaks lines but never damages with the disposal.
by Zelezny Chucks » Fri May 15, 2009 2:41 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:Zelezny Chucks wrote:silicone skyline wrote:I think it's a precautionary emergency. He would play if fully fit. Might be a test. Nahas shouldn't get dropped.
What did Jordan McMahon ever do wrong? I thought he has had a good season to date.
Good to see Cotchin back plus Raines named. Hope he can stay fit.
I'm tipping the Tigers this week. No Salopek leaves Port badly exposed at the hard ball with only Boak the real in and under player.
think they said McMahon's main problem is he burns the ball too much which I tend to agree with gets it and breaks lines but never damages with the disposal.
the reasons the dogs got rid of him maybe?!?
by Sorry Dude » Fri May 15, 2009 3:05 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Zelezny Chucks wrote:silicone skyline wrote:I think it's a precautionary emergency. He would play if fully fit. Might be a test. Nahas shouldn't get dropped.
What did Jordan McMahon ever do wrong? I thought he has had a good season to date.
Good to see Cotchin back plus Raines named. Hope he can stay fit.
I'm tipping the Tigers this week. No Salopek leaves Port badly exposed at the hard ball with only Boak the real in and under player.
think they said McMahon's main problem is he burns the ball too much which I tend to agree with gets it and breaks lines but never damages with the disposal.
the reasons the dogs got rid of him maybe?!?
Did they get rid of him or did Terry Wallace swoop on another dud?
by rogernumber10 » Fri May 15, 2009 3:17 pm
by silicone skyline » Fri May 15, 2009 3:19 pm
by rogernumber10 » Fri May 15, 2009 3:30 pm
silicone skyline wrote:Got him in your side?
by Sorry Dude » Fri May 15, 2009 3:30 pm
rogernumber10 wrote:I'll need someone to explain to me why Jack Riewoldt has been dropped this week. I can't understand why you leave out a kid that you expect to play 200 games when you're not burning it up anyway, and you want him to improve. He's not going that badly that he needs a break.
by Swooper16 » Fri May 15, 2009 3:43 pm
rogernumber10 wrote:I'll need someone to explain to me why Jack Riewoldt has been dropped this week. I can't understand why you leave out a kid that you expect to play 200 games when you're not burning it up anyway, and you want him to improve. He's not going that badly that he needs a break.
by rogernumber10 » Fri May 15, 2009 3:55 pm
Swooper16 wrote:rogernumber10 wrote:I'll need someone to explain to me why Jack Riewoldt has been dropped this week. I can't understand why you leave out a kid that you expect to play 200 games when you're not burning it up anyway, and you want him to improve. He's not going that badly that he needs a break.
Where have you seen Richmonds final 22..? Las i had seen he was on the extended I/C. Personally i hope he has as that would most likely mean nahas will get a game.
As to answer your question i dont know all the ins an outs of the richmond players but they have brought in Shulz, Morton and along with Edwards would all seem similar players. I would stick with Riewoldt ahead of those guys tho!!
by nuggety goodness » Fri May 15, 2009 6:19 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 16, 2009 2:16 am
by Groover » Sun May 17, 2009 11:57 pm
browny2323 wrote:Groover wrote:Got 1980 this week with 3 Donuts!
Who is leading in your comp Groover?
by Pup » Mon May 18, 2009 12:00 pm
by Kahuna » Mon May 18, 2009 3:00 pm
Not as much as some of us..............I dream about being 2-3.Pup wrote:in big trouble.
by silicone skyline » Mon May 18, 2009 3:01 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |