by SteveStevens » Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:57 pm
by carey » Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:24 pm
jimmy loughnan wrote:BL-tough, experienced, good leadership group, well drilled, mercurial forward line that can produce a bit of magic. Will come down to what is more beneficial in finals - clg's youth and pace, or bl's experience. I think clg were more cohesive with their ball movement and looked like a team that had played together a lot more than bl.
by carey » Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:33 pm
by Old Dog 13 » Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:50 am
The Bartman wrote:zedman wrote:The Bartman wrote:zedman wrote:hows alan doubleday going jimmy ?
Formerly of Rosewater??
i think he did...solid mofo with dark hair
In my first year of senior footy (95) I was playing C grade against Rossies and they had this solid unit called double day, he was a bouncer at joplins at the time. Anyway, he was carrying on like a knob so one of our blokes dropped him with the best right hook you'll ever see. When he came too he chased our bloke all over the ground. Piss funny! He would be getting on these days though.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:31 am
carey wrote:jimmy loughnan wrote:BL-tough, experienced, good leadership group, well drilled, mercurial forward line that can produce a bit of magic. Will come down to what is more beneficial in finals - clg's youth and pace, or bl's experience. I think clg were more cohesive with their ball movement and looked like a team that had played together a lot more than bl.
this isnt just a go at jimmy but does everyone on here think the flag is a 2horse race? pffft fair dinkum weve played 2 rounds CLG and brahma yes are 2 and 0 with huge % but they've both played glenunga (with all due respect) what about lockleys? 2 and 0 beaten 2 sides that most would've had in the top5 at the end of the year i honestly believe that there are 7teams that can win it yes CLG and brahma would be fav's CLG maybe 25/10 (noot a great finals record) and brahma 3/1 but to right off the other 4 or sides is just a joke after round2.
by scottroo » Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:29 pm
by watchdog » Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:46 pm
carey wrote:mark boothy cleared at the tribunal tonight as he should've been he did'nt hit any body in all my years of watching him play never seen him do 1 dirty thing he isnt that type of player justice was done.
by Q. » Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:54 pm
watchdog wrote:carey wrote:mark boothy cleared at the tribunal tonight as he should've been he did'nt hit any body in all my years of watching him play never seen him do 1 dirty thing he isnt that type of player justice was done.
How did Browny go at the tribunal? and also has anything else happened on the MP player or will the 2 match suspension stand?
by watchdog » Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:55 pm
by carey » Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:41 pm
watchdog wrote:On the SAAFL website on the Category of offences procedure it clearly states that
"A reported player must attend the tribunal before playing again"
Regardless of which player from which ever team commits an offence I thought they had to go to the tribunal, can anyone let me know if this procedure still exists??
by scottiemc » Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:28 pm
carey wrote:watchdog wrote:On the SAAFL website on the Category of offences procedure it clearly states that
"A reported player must attend the tribunal before playing again"
Regardless of which player from which ever team commits an offence I thought they had to go to the tribunal, can anyone let me know if this procedure still exists??
not sure mate but i was there when the umpire and the mitchell park player signed the paper work after the game to say that he misses 2games
by scottroo » Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:04 pm
by Groover » Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:27 pm
scottroo wrote:good to see footy chick have her dig at clgfc and player payments again in her weekly rant, should get her facts correct before she blabs her mouth off about cars etc....also she should note people dont care about hope valley and not write about them every week
by hawkseye » Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:43 pm
Groover wrote:scottroo wrote:good to see footy chick have her dig at clgfc and player payments again in her weekly rant, should get her facts correct before she blabs her mouth off about cars etc....also she should note people dont care about hope valley and not write about them every week
Technically she can write about whatever she wants mate, weather it be fiction or not, and just because you dont care about hope valley doesnt mean anyone else doesn't. I find it very good that she is passionate about her club because i cant name many other women who are
by The Bartman » Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:48 pm
demonseye wrote:Groover wrote:scottroo wrote:good to see footy chick have her dig at clgfc and player payments again in her weekly rant, should get her facts correct before she blabs her mouth off about cars etc....also she should note people dont care about hope valley and not write about them every week
Technically she can write about whatever she wants mate, weather it be fiction or not, and just because you dont care about hope valley doesnt mean anyone else doesn't. I find it very good that she is passionate about her club because i cant name many other women who are
Well said Groover. Maybe Scottroo you could contact the budget and ask to have a crack at something you know about?
by Lads » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:20 am
The Bartman wrote:demonseye wrote:Groover wrote:scottroo wrote:good to see footy chick have her dig at clgfc and player payments again in her weekly rant, should get her facts correct before she blabs her mouth off about cars etc....also she should note people dont care about hope valley and not write about them every week
Technically she can write about whatever she wants mate, weather it be fiction or not, and just because you dont care about hope valley doesnt mean anyone else doesn't. I find it very good that she is passionate about her club because i cant name many other women who are
Well said Groover. Maybe Scottroo you could contact the budget and ask to have a crack at something you know about?
Nice Groover. Scottroo has a bee in his bonnet about Hope Valley for some reason. Any chance cause we are in div 5 and CLG are not?
by mypaddock » Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:29 am
Groover wrote:scottroo wrote:good to see footy chick have her dig at clgfc and player payments again in her weekly rant, should get her facts correct before she blabs her mouth off about cars etc....also she should note people dont care about hope valley and not write about them every week
Technically she can write about whatever she wants mate, weather it be fiction or not, and just because you dont care about hope valley doesnt mean anyone else doesn't. I find it very good that she is passionate about her club because i cant name many other women who are
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:33 am
by Q. » Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:57 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:I didn't see CLG mentioned anywhere.
by Footy Chick » Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:58 am
scottroo wrote:good to see footy chick have her dig at clgfc and player payments again in her weekly rant, should get her facts correct before she blabs her mouth off about cars etc....also she should note people dont care about hope valley and not write about them every week
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |