Wayde Mills report

[Mickyj]

Judging by the amount of Eagles players running around with head strapping, Mills had a field day!!!!

Apparently all the bays players kept running into other Eags players due to their panic to get away from Cheep...

A few of them appeared to be a tad bit wary of young Cheep mainly at ballups and throw ins and in the packs around the ball .

[BL&G_Ump]

Judging by the amount of Eagles players running around with head strapping, Mills had a field day!!!!

Nah BL&G
Eagles players where hitting heads going for the ball .
Bays players were shouldering each other in a marking contest.it could have been worse the second bays player hit the first one very hard.

Good call Micky

[am Bays]

A few of them appeared to be a tad bit wary of young Cheep mainly at ballups and throw ins and in the packs around the ball .

That's you opinion Mickyj you stick to it

[BL&G_Ump]

A few of them appeared to be a tad bit wary of young Cheep mainly at ballups and throw ins and in the packs around the ball .

That's you opinion Mickyj you stick to it

Still dunno what cam over the poor lad to sign with the WWEAGLES instead of the mighty CDFC
Jokes

[EAGLES]

i love it when a plan comes together
Got him yes

[topsywaldron]

Is there a team out there whose supporters squeal longer and louder than Glenelg's when things don't go their way?

Maybe the Crows but then again, same thing.

[Dirko]

Is there a team out there whose supporters squeal longer and louder than Norwood's when things don't go their way?

Maybe the Crows but then again, same thing.

[topsywaldron]

Wacky forum editing huh? You sure got me a good one there.

[Dirko]

Yep, just working on your intellect.....

[topsywaldron]

Yep, just working on your intellect.....

So many zingers tonight, the 'Free Wayde Mills' campaign must be missing you.

[Dirko]

So many zingers tonight, the 'Free Wayde Mills' campaign must be missing you.

I'm sure since you're such an intellect, that you'd be able to explain how a person can be found guilty, when there is no
concrete evidence nor a known victim.

[once_were_warriors]

So many zingers tonight, the 'Free Wayde Mills' campaign must be missing you.

I'm sure since you're such an intellect, that you'd be able to explain how a person can be found guilty, when there is no
concrete evidence nor a known victim.

Perhaps a key witness with no reason or benefit to lie? = evidence

Don't need a body to convict someone of murder

[Psyber]

So many zingers tonight, the 'Free Wayde Mills' campaign must be missing you.

I'm sure since you're such an intellect, that you'd be able to explain how a person can be found guilty, when there is no
concrete evidence nor a known victim.

Perhaps a key witness with no reason or benefit to lie? = evidence
Don't need a body to convict someone of murder

At last, a rational comment on this thread!

[nickname]

So many zingers tonight, the 'Free Wayde Mills' campaign must be missing you.

I'm sure since you're such an intellect, that you'd be able to explain how a person can be found guilty, when there is no
concrete evidence nor a known victim.

It's not a criminal court it's a football tribunal. An umpire says he saw Mills hit an Eagles player. Mills denies it. The tribunal believes the umpire.
It's not as if this is a first, players have been reported for striking 'unknown' (i.e. unidentified) players since the game began.

[redandblack]

Correct.

Clubs also know that this year there is an appeals process, so it was open to Glenelg to have appealed the decision if they had wanted to.

[Dutchy]

Clubs also know that this year there is an appeals process, so it was open to Glenelg to have appealed the decision if they had wanted to.

which would have happened, until they looked at the draw

[JK]

Clubs also know that this year there is an appeals process, so it was open to Glenelg to have appealed the decision if they had wanted to.

which would have happened, until they looked at the draw

LOL ... Ooooohhh!!!

[redandblack]

Clubs also know that this year there is an appeals process, so it was open to Glenelg to have appealed the decision if they had wanted to.

which would have happened, until they looked at the draw

Ouch

Just remember, Dutchy, we finished in the top three of the Diadora Cup last year and I'm confident we'll manage that again

[Booney]

Sitting second at the moment...

[Jackal]

The SANFL tribunal is obviously taking a much firmer stance this year, perhaps trying to mirror the AFL tribunal pantomine. In fact they will be so tough this year that the Gowans will be fined 20 cents instead of getting off free for striking opposition players this season.