The Girth wrote:will lovetts evidence at the tribunal come back to haunt him in the future. What happened to the code of silence between players is that also a thing of the past.
Code of Silence.... are these guys bikies??? or underworld figures
by Footy Smart » Thu Apr 02, 2009 8:57 am
The Girth wrote:will lovetts evidence at the tribunal come back to haunt him in the future. What happened to the code of silence between players is that also a thing of the past.
by The Girth » Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:12 am
by Choccies » Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:06 am
The Girth wrote:yeah good one but i was of the understanding that you didnt drop another player in the s***t at the tribunal. Is this the way footy is heading now players who will dob you in given half a chance. A bit ordinary i think.
by Psyber » Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:04 pm
Constance_Perm wrote: Oh yeah, but Im sure the likes of Barrassi or Nicholls would have a different view and they were both champions of the game ...
It really depends what culture you want.The Girth wrote:will lovetts evidence at the tribunal come back to haunt him in the future. What happened to the code of silence between players is that also a thing of the past.
by JK » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:47 pm
Psyber wrote:Constance_Perm wrote: Oh yeah, but Im sure the likes of Barrassi or Nicholls would have a different view and they were both champions of the game ...It really depends what culture you want.The Girth wrote:will lovetts evidence at the tribunal come back to haunt him in the future. What happened to the code of silence between players is that also a thing of the past.
If you think bashing others, and being bashed, is a normal part of playing sport, and muscle is what Aussie rules is about, you support both propositions above.
If you think sport is about mastering the skills of the game, and not getting deliberately pulped, outside the rules, for being better at them than some of the lumbering brutes, you don't!
I wonder whether Barassi, Nicholls, and Neil Kerley in SA, would have looked quite as good if they had to play by today's rules. [I don't doubt they would still have been good players.]
As a kid, I saw Lindsay Head make Neil Kerley look silly - he missed him three times in one match trying to take him out - LH side-stepped him every time and got the ball.
by Psyber » Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:30 am
by JK » Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:37 am
Psyber wrote:I'm not criticising fair body contact in the process of winning the ball, but the deliberately going for the guy and not the ball.
I also deplore the hits behind play, or, in this case, after the siren ends play..
Physicality in the contest is one thing, but belting or crunching a guy who is not expecting it because he isn't in the contest at the time is another.
Kicking, kneeing, kneeling on, a guy who is down in a pack and defenceless needs to be stopped too.
by Pup » Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:07 am
The Girth wrote:will lovetts evidence at the tribunal come back to haunt him in the future. What happened to the code of silence between players is that also a thing of the past.
by jimmy loughnan » Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:10 am
by Booney » Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:52 am
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:31 pm
Booney wrote:Dale Mortimer, is that you again?
by brod » Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:13 pm
Booney wrote:He has been done for "Rough Conduct". Absolute joke. He, and it was at walking pace, walked into Lovett at the end of the first quarter and gave Lovett some "arjy barjy and push and shove". Absolute joke.
Meanwhile Steve Johnson apparently didnt "attepmt" to strike Hodge, despite the fact a clenched fist was thrown at Hodge and missed by very little.
Rough Conduct? Rough treatment more like it.
by catchisthecry » Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:06 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |