South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Local cricket is the go here. Any talk about local comps, grade cricket, etc.

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Phantom Gossiper » Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:49 pm

Ecky wrote:In the B-Grade Adelaide Lutheran were all out for 211. Peter Taylor (captain) carried his bat for 84 (I think) not out.


Well done and well done to PT, good to see he is as aggressive as ever :P 84 not out off 300 balls? =))

Nah but in all seriousness thats fantastic work, good luck next week.
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:35 pm
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Ted » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:16 pm

Great to see PT making runs! He's a top bloke, have alot of time for quality people.
Well done to Balding today who took 6 for 42 off 17 overs for NEK. Without him they would
be chasing 500 next week insTED of 343. He's a class act!
gizzin' on the miz since 2004
User avatar
Ted
Member
 
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby benjir » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:17 pm

Ruffhead wrote:Enfield C all out for 123 Parkers 1/3 off dodgy decision but such is life.


Was actually at this game and saw the dodgy decision in question, must say it was probably the worst decision i have ever seen!! batsman was out LBW, heard the ball hit the bat from the boundary like everyone else, the fielding team didnt even fully appeal, in the context of the match, it was terrible. Rose Park were not happy, which is fair, but took it on the chin and got over it.

So i dont think we will need to worry about them whinging and crying to the exec commitee about how the umpire made a poor decision, etc, etc, and continue to slag and totally disrespect an umpire to the point of emabarrsing their club, unlike some Div 1 clubs in this association, and to go to the put where a team will not walk onto the field if a certain umpire has there game or a certain club trying to change the rules because of a f&ckup on their part and trying to blame the umpire......
benjir
Mini-League
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:10 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Ted » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:22 pm

excuse me!!

this umpire you are talking about has admitted that he has cheated in the past
against a certain team so dont get up on here and talk absolute bullsh*t when you obviosly dont
know what you are talking about!
Why should we put up with an umpire that has admitted that " all i need to hear is an appeal
and its out"


thats not cricket.............
gizzin' on the miz since 2004
User avatar
Ted
Member
 
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby carey18 » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:48 pm

benjir wrote:
Ruffhead wrote:Enfield C all out for 123 Parkers 1/3 off dodgy decision but such is life.


Was actually at this game and saw the dodgy decision in question, must say it was probably the worst decision i have ever seen!! batsman was out LBW, heard the ball hit the bat from the boundary like everyone else, the fielding team didnt even fully appeal, in the context of the match, it was terrible. Rose Park were not happy, which is fair, but took it on the chin and got over it.

So i dont think we will need to worry about them whinging and crying to the exec commitee about how the umpire made a poor decision, etc, etc, and continue to slag and totally disrespect an umpire to the point of emabarrsing their club, unlike some Div 1 clubs in this association, and to go to the put where a team will not walk onto the field if a certain umpire has there game or a certain club trying to change the rules because of a f&ckup on their part and trying to blame the umpire......


You are a fair dinkum idiot with a first post like this. if u have got something to say agaisnt our club dont be a keyboard warrior and hide behind a nickname on here. They umpire in question has admitted to cheating you peanut. Pull your head in
carey18
 

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby spintwin » Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:04 pm

benjir wrote:
Ruffhead wrote:Enfield C all out for 123 Parkers 1/3 off dodgy decision but such is life.


Was actually at this game and saw the dodgy decision in question, must say it was probably the worst decision i have ever seen!! batsman was out LBW, heard the ball hit the bat from the boundary like everyone else, the fielding team didnt even fully appeal, in the context of the match, it was terrible. Rose Park were not happy, which is fair, but took it on the chin and got over it.

So i dont think we will need to worry about them whinging and crying to the exec commitee about how the umpire made a poor decision, etc, etc, and continue to slag and totally disrespect an umpire to the point of emabarrsing their club, unlike some Div 1 clubs in this association, and to go to the put where a team will not walk onto the field if a certain umpire has there game or a certain club trying to change the rules because of a f&ckup on their part and trying to blame the umpire......


Good to see your making friends with your first post. Maybe you should not speak about things that you have little idea about. Good to see your out supporting during the finals bad luck you could not actually be playing cricket. With post like this you wont last on this forum. :evil: :evil:
spintwin
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:04 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby No1_Source » Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:12 pm

Well done to central mission today..... we played good for about 5 minutes when gully took 5/0 virtually but 5 minutes wont win grand finals... Rose Park HTFU umpires give dodgey decisions it happens you might as well start bringing in refferals then???? the next question need to be raised is permits why have rules if permits just cancel them out?????
User avatar
No1_Source
Rookie
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:49 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Phantom Gossiper » Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:24 pm

No1_Source wrote:Well done to central mission today..... we played good for about 5 minutes when gully took 5/0 virtually but 5 minutes wont win grand finals... Rose Park HTFU umpires give dodgey decisions it happens you might as well start bringing in refferals then???? the next question need to be raised is permits why have rules if permits just cancel them out?????


Dont be so hard on your side, you played a sensational first half of the day, the game began to slip away and you pulled it back in, stuck to your guns and rolled us for 132 when we had probably 200 in mind.

Its just cricket, and unlucky on your behalf you ran into a rampaging Wright.

Your not dead yet, still next week and its a funny game... saving the best for next wicket arent they ;) :P
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:35 pm
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Mr. Green » Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:31 pm

Phantom Gossiper wrote:
No1_Source wrote:Well done to central mission today..... we played good for about 5 minutes when gully took 5/0 virtually but 5 minutes wont win grand finals... Rose Park HTFU umpires give dodgey decisions it happens you might as well start bringing in refferals then???? the next question need to be raised is permits why have rules if permits just cancel them out?????


Dont be so hard on your side, you played a sensational first half of the day, the game began to slip away and you pulled it back in, stuck to your guns and rolled us for 132 when we had probably 200 in mind.

Its just cricket, and unlucky on your behalf you ran into a rampaging Wright.

Your not dead yet, still next week and its a funny game... saving the best for next wicket arent they ;) :P



Well done to Paul Wright, he has done a lot of damage to Enfield with the ball, however as the Phantom has said the game isn't over. 132 is a par score at Terama, and is 97runs away from Enfields reach, however young Adam Gully had a great day with the ball, and he may be able to back it up with the bat, the tail just needs to hang around to see him through. I recall an Enfield game earlier in the season when Enfield had Paralowie, at one stage 7/15, then it was 9/59 chasing a total slightly underpar at Terama of 114. Paralowie acheived this. There is no reason Enfield can't repeat the heroics of Paralowie.
User avatar
Mr. Green
Mini-League
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:48 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Phantom Gossiper » Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:36 pm

Mr. Green wrote:
Phantom Gossiper wrote:
No1_Source wrote:Well done to central mission today..... we played good for about 5 minutes when gully took 5/0 virtually but 5 minutes wont win grand finals... Rose Park HTFU umpires give dodgey decisions it happens you might as well start bringing in refferals then???? the next question need to be raised is permits why have rules if permits just cancel them out?????


Dont be so hard on your side, you played a sensational first half of the day, the game began to slip away and you pulled it back in, stuck to your guns and rolled us for 132 when we had probably 200 in mind.

Its just cricket, and unlucky on your behalf you ran into a rampaging Wright.

Your not dead yet, still next week and its a funny game... saving the best for next wicket arent they ;) :P



Well done to Paul Wright, he has done a lot of damage to Enfield with the ball, however as the Phantom has said the game isn't over. 132 is a par score at Terama, and is 97runs away from Enfields reach, however young Adam Gully had a great day with the ball, and he may be able to back it up with the bat, the tail just needs to hang around to see him through. I recall an Enfield game earlier in the season when Enfield had Paralowie, at one stage 7/15, then it was 9/59 chasing a total slightly underpar at Terama of 114. Paralowie acheived this. There is no reason Enfield can't repeat the heroics of Paralowie.


As long as they dont leave it all up to you ay Mr Green ;)

I must say though, pretty disapointing that your side relies and puts so much pressure on young Gully, whats wrong with the top 6 bats? tsk tsk.

p.s thanks for dishing up that delicious full toss today son :D
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:35 pm
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Mr. Green » Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:45 pm

Phantom Gossiper wrote:
Mr. Green wrote:
Phantom Gossiper wrote:
No1_Source wrote:Well done to central mission today..... we played good for about 5 minutes when gully took 5/0 virtually but 5 minutes wont win grand finals... Rose Park HTFU umpires give dodgey decisions it happens you might as well start bringing in refferals then???? the next question need to be raised is permits why have rules if permits just cancel them out?????


Dont be so hard on your side, you played a sensational first half of the day, the game began to slip away and you pulled it back in, stuck to your guns and rolled us for 132 when we had probably 200 in mind.

Its just cricket, and unlucky on your behalf you ran into a rampaging Wright.

Your not dead yet, still next week and its a funny game... saving the best for next wicket arent they ;) :P



Well done to Paul Wright, he has done a lot of damage to Enfield with the ball, however as the Phantom has said the game isn't over. 132 is a par score at Terama, and is 97runs away from Enfields reach, however young Adam Gully had a great day with the ball, and he may be able to back it up with the bat, the tail just needs to hang around to see him through. I recall an Enfield game earlier in the season when Enfield had Paralowie, at one stage 7/15, then it was 9/59 chasing a total slightly underpar at Terama of 114. Paralowie acheived this. There is no reason Enfield can't repeat the heroics of Paralowie.


As long as they dont leave it all up to you ay Mr Green ;)

I must say though, pretty disapointing that your side relies and puts so much pressure on young Gully, whats wrong with the top 6 bats? tsk tsk.

p.s thanks for dishing up that delicious full toss today son :D


Phantom are you sure you know who Mr. Green is? ;)
Im sure i heard that young lad say that he had a couple slip out the hand.

Overall he bowled reasonably well, good pace, some movement, and a reasonable line.

The top 6 all had a bad day today which is unfortunate, since in the past few innings they have stood up. However CM have had their own batting collapse woes in the past, i guess thats just cricket.
User avatar
Mr. Green
Mini-League
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:48 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Ruffhead » Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:07 am

carey18 wrote:
benjir wrote:
Ruffhead wrote:Enfield C all out for 123 Parkers 1/3 off dodgy decision but such is life.


Was actually at this game and saw the dodgy decision in question, must say it was probably the worst decision i have ever seen!! batsman was out LBW, heard the ball hit the bat from the boundary like everyone else, the fielding team didnt even fully appeal, in the context of the match, it was terrible. Rose Park were not happy, which is fair, but took it on the chin and got over it.

So i dont think we will need to worry about them whinging and crying to the exec commitee about how the umpire made a poor decision, etc, etc, and continue to slag and totally disrespect an umpire to the point of emabarrsing their club, unlike some Div 1 clubs in this association, and to go to the put where a team will not walk onto the field if a certain umpire has there game or a certain club trying to change the rules because of a f&ckup on their part and trying to blame the umpire......


You are a fair dinkum idiot with a first post like this. if u have got something to say agaisnt our club dont be a keyboard warrior and hide behind a nickname on here. They umpire in question has admitted to cheating you peanut. Pull your head in


I don't know who that is but you don't mind poking the hornets nest well done.
Never take life too seriously, no one gets out alive anyway.
User avatar
Ruffhead
Mini-League
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:46 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Goat Herder » Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:37 am

benjir wrote:
Ruffhead wrote:Enfield C all out for 123 Parkers 1/3 off dodgy decision but such is life.


Was actually at this game and saw the dodgy decision in question, must say it was probably the worst decision i have ever seen!! batsman was out LBW, heard the ball hit the bat from the boundary like everyone else, the fielding team didnt even fully appeal, in the context of the match, it was terrible. Rose Park were not happy, which is fair, but took it on the chin and got over it.

So i dont think we will need to worry about them whinging and crying to the exec commitee about how the umpire made a poor decision, etc, etc, and continue to slag and totally disrespect an umpire to the point of emabarrsing their club, unlike some Div 1 clubs in this association, and to go to the put where a team will not walk onto the field if a certain umpire has there game or a certain club trying to change the rules because of a f&ckup on their part and trying to blame the umpire......


Respect is earnt champ! The white shirt and black trousers don't mean $#!t if the bloke wearing it disregards & disrespects the basic umpiring etiquette of facilitating fair play. :evil:
User avatar
Goat Herder
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1522
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:34 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby Goat Herder » Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:50 am

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Also great to see Marshall hit a 100! wheres Pidge now?


:lol: Was what that I said about comments made on the field coming back to bite you in the arse..?!?? :-? :-k :P ;) :lol:
User avatar
Goat Herder
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1522
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:34 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby plucca » Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:59 am

Goat Herder wrote:
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Also great to see Marshall hit a 100! wheres Pidge now?


:lol: Was what that I said about comments made on the field coming back to bite you in the arse..?!?? :-? :-k :P ;) :lol:

what a prick of a day! nothing went our way and congrats to marshall and smithy batted well!!!!! baldo u legend f....... awesome as usual
User avatar
plucca
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:41 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Blackfriars OS

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby plucca » Sun Mar 15, 2009 2:26 am

carey18 wrote:
benjir wrote:
Ruffhead wrote:Enfield C all out for 123 Parkers 1/3 off dodgy decision but such is life.


Was actually at this game and saw the dodgy decision in question, must say it was probably the worst decision i have ever seen!! batsman was out LBW, heard the ball hit the bat from the boundary like everyone else, the fielding team didnt even fully appeal, in the context of the match, it was terrible. Rose Park were not happy, which is fair, but took it on the chin and got over it.

So i dont think we will need to worry about them whinging and crying to the exec commitee about how the umpire made a poor decision, etc, etc, and continue to slag and totally disrespect an umpire to the point of emabarrsing their club, unlike some Div 1 clubs in this association, and to go to the put where a team will not walk onto the field if a certain umpire has there game or a certain club trying to change the rules because of a f&ckup on their part and trying to blame the umpire......


You are a fair dinkum idiot with a first post like this. if u have got something to say agaisnt our club dont be a keyboard warrior and hide behind a nickname on here. They umpire in question has admitted to cheating you peanut. Pull your head in

so hendo u still coming out and playing for us next season?
User avatar
plucca
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:41 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Blackfriars OS

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby auto » Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:06 am

****, 300 and **** 43. thats huge. Congrats on the hundreds boys, that **** massive in a gf. Nek is a smallish and fast ground, but its gonna take some batting to get that. The subway corporate tent might be the place to be next week! Cant believe Methos conceded victory on day one.
User avatar
auto
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2803
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:49 am
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 29 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby auto » Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:08 am

Hi there plucca. just a question, is gatt playing, or cameron or both?
User avatar
auto
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2803
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:49 am
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 29 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby plucca » Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:30 am

gatty is playing mate. unchanged side!
User avatar
plucca
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:41 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Blackfriars OS

Re: South Australian Churches and Community Cricket Association

Postby carey18 » Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:42 am

Dave my best cricket is way behind me lol
carey18
 

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Regional Cricket Comps

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |