by wycbloods » Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:00 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:59 pm
wycbloods wrote:Brenton here
The forecast is for rain on Saturday that may well save Sheidow from missing out on the finals and may keep the bays from sneaking in. It would be a shame to have the last round washed out.
by Amateur Footy » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:19 pm
CoverKing wrote:wycbloods wrote:Brenton here
The forecast is for rain on Saturday that may well save Sheidow from missing out on the finals and may keep the bays from sneaking in. It would be a shame to have the last round washed out.
screw sheidow and glenelg, it is going to cost wyc home ground for the final isnt that right roseboy?
by Amateur Footy » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:22 pm
CoverKing wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:Yeah it's for real. Very tight bowling and some interesting batting techniques against it.
Why would anyone ever claim an innings in a lower grade would be worth anything in a higher grade. Pointless comparison.
I also do not understand Glenelg's slow pace in the batting. So often a side can dig in during the second innings. Would have been ideal to put them back in the same day. Looks like Plympton and Sheidow will lose so all Glenelg have to do is win outright and they are in. Strange.
i hope glenelg are held to only a first innings win where the miss out by 5 overs or somethin like that and the slow batting of sat comes back to bite em on the ass...they had NH 7/19 at one stage! Amazing by ANA.
we actually agreed on two things there AF u should never have left![]()
and whats with the techniques against calderbank?? just curious as i wasnt there, interested to know how he got em all
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:41 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:CoverKing wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:Yeah it's for real. Very tight bowling and some interesting batting techniques against it.
Why would anyone ever claim an innings in a lower grade would be worth anything in a higher grade. Pointless comparison.
I also do not understand Glenelg's slow pace in the batting. So often a side can dig in during the second innings. Would have been ideal to put them back in the same day. Looks like Plympton and Sheidow will lose so all Glenelg have to do is win outright and they are in. Strange.
i hope glenelg are held to only a first innings win where the miss out by 5 overs or somethin like that and the slow batting of sat comes back to bite em on the ass...they had NH 7/19 at one stage! Amazing by ANA.
we actually agreed on two things there AF u should never have left![]()
and whats with the techniques against calderbank?? just curious as i wasnt there, interested to know how he got em all
I came back cause I thought you had left. Maybe this time my posts on here won't wind up on facebook?
by Gowser » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:20 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:I also do not understand Glenelg's slow pace in the batting. So often a side can dig in during the second innings. Would have been ideal to put them back in the same day. Looks like Plympton and Sheidow will lose so all Glenelg have to do is win outright and they are in. Strange.
Total 91
Overs 49.1
Total 2/54
Overs 25
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:56 pm
Gowser wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:I also do not understand Glenelg's slow pace in the batting. So often a side can dig in during the second innings. Would have been ideal to put them back in the same day. Looks like Plympton and Sheidow will lose so all Glenelg have to do is win outright and they are in. Strange.
By the looks of things ANA also got a bonus 2 overs.
- Code: Select all
Total 91
Overs 49.1
- Code: Select all
Total 2/54
Overs 25
Shouldn't NH only had to bowl 23 overs?
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:12 pm
by bazza1 » Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:20 pm
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:52 pm
bazza1 wrote:The last wicket fell and tea was taken, so no overs were deducted.
by bazza1 » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:01 pm
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:02 pm
bazza1 wrote:I rang Tony Fromene to ask him why we didnt lose those 2 overs and that was the explanation.
by bazza1 » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:05 pm
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:15 pm
bazza1 wrote:You have to teach your lad this Bloods... The umpire is always right
by bazza1 » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:20 pm
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:26 pm
bazza1 wrote:Were you at home when you left that lovely voice mail message on my phone![]()
![]()
No good for kiddy ears
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:44 pm
wycbloods wrote:bazza1 wrote:Were you at home when you left that lovely voice mail message on my phone![]()
![]()
No good for kiddy ears
Yes and the boy was out being looked after. You shouldn't let your kids hear that message because you were right it wasn't for kids ears but JB was in good form for that msg![]()
.
by Gowser » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:08 pm
bazza1 wrote:I rang Tony Fromene to ask him why we didnt lose those 2 overs and that was the explanation.
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:11 pm
Gowser wrote:bazza1 wrote:I rang Tony Fromene to ask him why we didnt lose those 2 overs and that was the explanation.
as far as i know it is irellevant when the wicket falls.
by Amateur Footy » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:46 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |