by teamwork » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:59 am
by book worm » Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:30 pm
teamwork wrote:how is glenunga looking? have heard their trainings have been ramping up nicely in tune for rd 1. shane fox is a possibility to join good mate brad thompson out there, would be an extremely handy pick up. WAFL experience (albeit limited due to injury) in the past few years and is in tip top shape. would compliment brad thompson silky skills in the midfield. would carve up this medicore div 6 league.
by EddieV » Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:54 pm
book worm wrote:teamwork wrote:how is glenunga looking? have heard their trainings have been ramping up nicely in tune for rd 1. shane fox is a possibility to join good mate brad thompson out there, would be an extremely handy pick up. WAFL experience (albeit limited due to injury) in the past few years and is in tip top shape. would compliment brad thompson silky skills in the midfield. would carve up this medicore div 6 league.
Thats good news for Glenunga, hopefully they have some more good pick ups, cause they will need a few quallity players to lift them up into he finals. Heard that Harvey from CLG has done his ankle and will miss about 4 weeks (not sure if it was a footy related injury), will he be ok for rd 1?? Also heard the Mitchell Park have picked up a few Edwardstown players from there move to the SFL and will be alot stronger this year. Can anyone confirm??
by Bigshow82 » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:20 pm
by aceman » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:11 pm
Trinity wrote:aceman wrote:I reckon it would be better if the Trinity guys spent more time worrying about the previous financial status of their new recruits rather than try to give 'critiques' on what might happen with other clubs.
Especially when they go squealing like "stuck pigs" to the SAAFL without knowing the facts.
What r u on about mate?
We have a player that has to clear his fees to his previous club before he can play with us, which the club has already addressed with this player, and encouraged him to do so ASAP,
Or are u referring to the player that we didnt clear because he was unfinancial as he still owed the club for club merchandice he took and didnt pay for, shorts, socks etc. Which he got cleared anyway because the SAAFL dont see that as unfinancial?
How is that squealing like "stuck pigs" to the SAAFL?
SAFFL said u cant hold a player back for those unfinancial reasons so he was cleared?
So which one are u pissed off about?
The player that owns your club money that is no benifit to Trinity until he pays it?
OR
You think its ok for players to take socks, shorts etc and not pay for them?
Or if its about something completly different then i have no idea what u r talking about?
by scottroo » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:27 pm
by lovetotalkfooty » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:54 pm
scottroo wrote:clg 16.16 (112) defeated aldinga 1.1 (7)
4x15 min quaters
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:07 pm
by Trinity » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:56 pm
aceman wrote:Trinity wrote:aceman wrote:I reckon it would be better if the Trinity guys spent more time worrying about the previous financial status of their new recruits rather than try to give 'critiques' on what might happen with other clubs.
Especially when they go squealing like "stuck pigs" to the SAAFL without knowing the facts.
What r u on about mate?
We have a player that has to clear his fees to his previous club before he can play with us, which the club has already addressed with this player, and encouraged him to do so ASAP,
Or are u referring to the player that we didnt clear because he was unfinancial as he still owed the club for club merchandice he took and didnt pay for, shorts, socks etc. Which he got cleared anyway because the SAAFL dont see that as unfinancial?
How is that squealing like "stuck pigs" to the SAAFL?
SAFFL said u cant hold a player back for those unfinancial reasons so he was cleared?
So which one are u pissed off about?
The player that owns your club money that is no benifit to Trinity until he pays it?
OR
You think its ok for players to take socks, shorts etc and not pay for them?
Or if its about something completly different then i have no idea what u r talking about?
Christ, how many have you got? I don't know if this guy fits into the categories above, probably does. the top one
Well pal, I'll fill you in.
A player X (BR to you) wants to be cleared to your club and is unfinancial with our club because he thought he had paid his subs but hadn't so your main man sent a letter of complaint to the SAAFL saying "this isn't fair, player X says his subs are paid but club Y says they're not! We get told to to give SAAFL the relevant details.We furnish the info to the SAAFL but that's not good enough and now we have to front them again with all of the minute details of who got paid what, how was it paid, what was deducted and why it was deducted. Matey, you have the w^nker and I hope he looks for a clearance next year to go somewhere else and you cop this sort of crap from another club that squeals to the SAAFL like someone from within your mob has!
You might want to think about changing your name to the Trinity Old Squealers Footy club.
by the big bang » Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:39 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Did the big bang play?
by aceman » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:15 am
by Keepitreal » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:53 am
aceman wrote:Trinity, we probably would do the same thing but in a different manner, quite right.
On Feb 2nd we received the clearance application and I replied to your secretary's email with the details of why we refused it and gave a indepth account of what was owed and why. I am happy to furnish you with a copy of it too if you wish. All the secretary had to do was get my details out of the SAAFL book,pick up the phone and have a chat, it could have been resolved in a heartbeat. Somehow it went back to the SAAFL and we had to supply them with a detailed account of the same thing. Now we have to do it again in a different format just to appease the crap happy people at Thebarton. All this for a player that played 5 games and then bolted.
Send me a pm, I'm happy to provide you with all the details but clubs are run by volunteers, not administration gurus that get paid for going through this bullsh*t because a player either didn't keep/read/care about his payment slip, and now thinks he's hard done by when we refuse to clear him.
Give us a break! It's not rocket science but let common sense prevail, has trust been thrown out with the daily garbage?
by Pumba » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:43 am
by EddieV » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Pumba wrote:what trial games are on this weekend?
by zedman » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:34 pm
EddieV wrote:Pumba wrote:what trial games are on this weekend?
Elizabeth V Brahma Lodge at Elizabeth on Sunday
by carey » Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:49 pm
Bigshow82 wrote:I hear Paralowie will be playing Salisbury West this Saturday @ Paralowie. Should be interesting too watch.
by the tyre man » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:03 pm
carey wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:I hear Paralowie will be playing Salisbury West this Saturday @ Paralowie. Should be interesting too watch.
you heard right mate for paralowie no barnes or holland both injured albeit very minor injurys not worth risking.
by Bigshow82 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:26 pm
the tyre man wrote:carey wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:I hear Paralowie will be playing Salisbury West this Saturday @ Paralowie. Should be interesting too watch.
you heard right mate for paralowie no barnes or holland both injured albeit very minor injurys not worth risking.
wat time is the game at paralowie
by '00'02'03'07 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:11 am
by jimmy loughnan » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:24 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |