by JK » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:24 pm
FD88 wrote:Referral pending on Kallis....oh my. I hate this referral system so, so much.
by spell_check » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:26 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:FD88 wrote:Referral pending on Kallis....oh my. I hate this referral system so, so much.
Is it just me, or are these commentators a little on the biased side?
Now Im no fan of Billy Bowden, but hard to go him over giving Kallis out .. I'd reckon every umpire in world cricket would have given that out
by dinglinga » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:26 pm
by JK » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:29 pm
spell_check wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:FD88 wrote:Referral pending on Kallis....oh my. I hate this referral system so, so much.
Is it just me, or are these commentators a little on the biased side?
Now Im no fan of Billy Bowden, but hard to go him over giving Kallis out .. I'd reckon every umpire in world cricket would have given that out
There will be someone on here who will say to reverse the decision was a good call.
by Thiele » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:31 pm
by spell_check » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:31 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:spell_check wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:FD88 wrote:Referral pending on Kallis....oh my. I hate this referral system so, so much.
Is it just me, or are these commentators a little on the biased side?
Now Im no fan of Billy Bowden, but hard to go him over giving Kallis out .. I'd reckon every umpire in world cricket would have given that out
There will be someone on here who will say to reverse the decision was a good call.
Well I guess to the letter of the law it was, but surely you cant condemn Bowden when a ball pitches 4cm outside the line and is clearly going on to hit middle? (lol obviously I dont mean you personally Spelly)
by rod_rooster » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:32 pm
by FD88 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:33 pm
by ubeauty » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:34 pm
by JK » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:35 pm
by FD88 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:38 pm
FD88 wrote:Well that wicket keeps us alive (and puts us just a little ahead given Smith was the casualty) but it's all still on us. Amla looks fluent but as the commentators say he's prone to the occasional brain snap so I think he's our ticket to having them 3 down at the close of play. Imo we've got to get them something like 5 down before they get much beyond 200. We don't want this pattern of them getting on top, then us grabbing a wicket to just get our noses in front again because they could still pinch it as they did in Perth.
by RoosterMarty » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:03 pm
by FD88 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:05 pm
by purch » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:33 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:35 pm
by purch » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:48 pm
by FD88 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:16 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |