by Tooting Bec » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:33 pm
by ftandsq » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:47 pm
Tooting Bec wrote:Typical Ballhog. You get your hackles up at a comment which is spot on. How can someone call themselves loyal to a club a particulary if they have been given the honour of being captain, and then leave. Also that Baters was paid for playing last year? (it doesn't matter about the amount it's the principle) Surely most locals at all HFL clubs understand the fact that to be competitive with othe teams, players have to be bought in.
Yes I do sympathise with people who have stuck around, but I believe if you continue working hard good things will happen.
by BALLHOG » Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:00 pm
Tooting Bec wrote:Typical Ballhog. You get your hackles up at a comment which is spot on. How can someone call themselves loyal to a club a particulary if they have been given the honour of being captain, and then leave. Also that Baters was paid for playing last year? (it doesn't matter about the amount it's the principle) Surely most locals at all HFL clubs understand the fact that to be competitive with othe teams, players have to be bought in.
Yes I do sympathise with people who have stuck around, but I believe if you continue working hard good things will happen.
by Amateur Footy » Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:09 pm
MONTE CRISTO wrote:You are kidding me! The Fiejens are getting paid to play? Sure they are handy hills footballers but there are plenty around who are better and getting nothing. If a club is paying them money then heaven help the direction football is heading!
by CountryVic » Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:25 pm
ftandsq wrote:Tooting Bec wrote:Typical Ballhog. You get your hackles up at a comment which is spot on. How can someone call themselves loyal to a club a particulary if they have been given the honour of being captain, and then leave. Also that Baters was paid for playing last year? (it doesn't matter about the amount it's the principle) Surely most locals at all HFL clubs understand the fact that to be competitive with othe teams, players have to be bought in.
Yes I do sympathise with people who have stuck around, but I believe if you continue working hard good things will happen.
Sorry Bec i have to disagree, Those guys have done the hard yards for many years at the club, to see so called "Guns" recruited and paid silly amounts of money to stay for 1 year then leave. It would get you down as a player who has been there all your life, and there not getting any younger! You play the game for enjoyment and as a local i wouldnt enjoy seeing players coming yearly and rape my footy club and leave all the time and have the club just continue to do the same thing. Still cannot beleive the amounts being paid to recruits this year, its laughable. Knowing that there only staying for a year and are going to leave!
Fully understand why you would leave and seek enjoyment in the game we all fell in love with as kids! Good luck to them.
by alice the camel » Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:45 pm
CountryVic wrote:
Enjoyment should come from working hard with your team mates and getting the best out of yourself. It shouldn't matter were you play. No doubt losing hurts but suck it up and work hard to turn the tide.
I have played at 2 clubs in my career the first club we struggled for years then turned it around and had some success and i rated that alot higher and gained more satisfaction from that then when i changed teams (because of work committments) and walked into an already successful side.
Has theformer Bridgewater Captain changed clubs to and HFL team or different league?
Pretty tough for the playing group to keep spirits up when your captain and long serving player deserts his team mates and club when he feels they are getting raped. Not a great example.
by BALLHOG » Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:52 pm
CountryVic wrote:ftandsq wrote:Tooting Bec wrote:Typical Ballhog. You get your hackles up at a comment which is spot on. How can someone call themselves loyal to a club a particulary if they have been given the honour of being captain, and then leave. Also that Baters was paid for playing last year? (it doesn't matter about the amount it's the principle) Surely most locals at all HFL clubs understand the fact that to be competitive with othe teams, players have to be bought in.
Yes I do sympathise with people who have stuck around, but I believe if you continue working hard good things will happen.
Sorry Bec i have to disagree, Those guys have done the hard yards for many years at the club, to see so called "Guns" recruited and paid silly amounts of money to stay for 1 year then leave. It would get you down as a player who has been there all your life, and there not getting any younger! You play the game for enjoyment and as a local i wouldnt enjoy seeing players coming yearly and rape my footy club and leave all the time and have the club just continue to do the same thing. Still cannot beleive the amounts being paid to recruits this year, its laughable. Knowing that there only staying for a year and are going to leave!
Fully understand why you would leave and seek enjoyment in the game we all fell in love with as kids! Good luck to them.
Enjoyment should come from working hard with your team mates and getting the best out of yourself. It shouldn't matter were you play. No doubt losing hurts but suck it up and work hard to turn the tide.
I have played at 2 clubs in my career the first club we struggled for years then turned it around and had some success and i rated that alot higher and gained more satisfaction from that then when i changed teams (because of work committments) and walked into an already successful side.
Has theformer Bridgewater Captain changed clubs to and HFL team or different league?
Pretty tough for the playing group to keep spirits up when your captain and long serving player deserts his team mates and club when he feels they are getting raped. Not a great example.
by GetTheSherrin » Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:34 pm
by magpiemaster » Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:55 pm
by dangermouse » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:13 pm
by kick it to me » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:24 pm
Dashin wrote:I tend to disagree here fellas. I reckon inter-league is a great concept provided you have your best team on the park. There's no chance of that happening at the moment because there's no history between us and B,L & G, but if all of a sudden we start putting a gun team on the field each year, the games will be worth watching and all of a sudden everyone will jump back on the whole idea. There be no more of this, 'we didn't have our best side on the park'...the winner would have genuine bragging rights as the better comp for the following 12 months. I'd like to think the HFL's best side would beat the BL&G comp all things being equal, but at the moment we can't make that claim as we keep getting flogged!
I certainly can't see any real issues with making it compulsory, it's not as though you're sending these guys off to do community service, they're actually doing something they enjoy doing, only this time it's on a bigger stage. If blokes really don't want to play, slap them with a one week suspension(not two), it's no big deal, they can sit out for a week and everyone can get on with it. I think we'd all be surprised how interesting it became given a few close encounters.
by Howard » Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:56 am
by BALLHOG » Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:16 am
Howard wrote:It's been interesting reading about the Raiders, with people suggesting they are the only club recruiting guys in for cash, staying a year then shooting through. This obviously upsets everyone as these guys are seen as "raping the club" or "giving f...k all back to the club". As mentioned here before it's very well known that very few recruits (at bridgy) are treated well by their new team mates. I think there are stacks of reasons for that eg the locals don't rate them as the number one reason.
The probable real reason for bridgy's problems is the lack of depth, with recruits only able to fill some gaps, when they don't win games off their own boot the locals antagonism against them starts again and so the cycle continues.
The fact that the club is not a united unit is more the problem, if EVERYONE pulled their collective heads in and actually worked harder, and not leave it to the next bloke, they MIGHT then actually get somewhere, while they have guys amongst the team white anting efforts to improve they're on the road to no where.
Good luck Monty, Steve and Mat - I hope you find what you're looking for.
by CountryVic » Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:57 am
by Dashin » Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:59 am
kick it to me wrote:Dashin wrote:I tend to disagree here fellas. I reckon inter-league is a great concept provided you have your best team on the park. There's no chance of that happening at the moment because there's no history between us and B,L & G, but if all of a sudden we start putting a gun team on the field each year, the games will be worth watching and all of a sudden everyone will jump back on the whole idea. There be no more of this, 'we didn't have our best side on the park'...the winner would have genuine bragging rights as the better comp for the following 12 months. I'd like to think the HFL's best side would beat the BL&G comp all things being equal, but at the moment we can't make that claim as we keep getting flogged!
I certainly can't see any real issues with making it compulsory, it's not as though you're sending these guys off to do community service, they're actually doing something they enjoy doing, only this time it's on a bigger stage. If blokes really don't want to play, slap them with a one week suspension(not two), it's no big deal, they can sit out for a week and everyone can get on with it. I think we'd all be surprised how interesting it became given a few close encounters.
Whilst i think interleague at a senior levels is a load of rubbish and of minimal interest to anyone, it seems that the hfl in their wisdom will not drop it. after all it makes owen feel very important. The problem with one week suspensions dashin is that it will seriously disadvantage those clubs playing reasonable teams the week after. For a club which is playing bridgey after interleauge (mt lofty this year, correct me if im wrong) who cares if half the club is suspended, they will still get the win regardless. Expect some interesting players being taken off with injuries in the final minutes of games right across the HFL the week before interleauge.
by BALLHOG » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:43 am
CountryVic wrote:I agree with you Howard on the imports getting treated like crap, but last year with the new guys doing a pre season and helping out with Oakbank I thought they got treated like everyone else.It wasn't until the season started when a few of them started to have a crack at some of the colts comming through and that's when things went bad because some of these young lads were out performing a few of these imports.
by Gervais » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:15 pm
by Bat Pad » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:19 pm
Gervais wrote:A couple of weeks ago the Courier had an article on the ins and outs of each team.
wasn't much mention of any ins for Onkas. can someone please advise of their new players ?
also, same article said that Bridgewater were looking at Brad Devries. has he signed with Bridgy or is he likely to go back to Onkas ?
by toot toot » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:49 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Gervais wrote:A couple of weeks ago the Courier had an article on the ins and outs of each team.
wasn't much mention of any ins for Onkas. can someone please advise of their new players ?
also, same article said that Bridgewater were looking at Brad Devries. has he signed with Bridgy or is he likely to go back to Onkas ?
He has signed with Bridgey. I believe Onkas have knocked back the clearence, however I thinkdue to signing with Bridgewater he cannot play for Onkas. So if they don't clear him he cannot play anywhere. I think thats how it works. He would win the clearence on appeal i would have thought
by Pumba » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:50 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |