typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
Are you fishing ?????
by auto » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:00 pm
typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
by auto » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:18 pm
typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
by Magpies96 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:19 pm
Ecky wrote:Are you calling me a bozo, are you BB?![]()
The facts are though that when this matter was discussed with the official representative from your club at the last delegates meeting, he told the exec that he thought that the penalty was fair, and he wasn't going to dispute it.
If Fitzroy had put forward a good argument as to why you shouldn't have lost the points, I would have supported your argument, but since your own representative agreed with the decision, the outcome was obvious.
Of course the decision cannot be reversed now, that would open up a much larger can of worms, and as you yourself say, the exec needs to be firm and clear with its decisions, and not changing them.
Seriously though, I think that one of your guys should join the exec, you have some good ideas on how the rules can be tightened up in some areas.
by Pidge » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:21 pm
automaticwicky wrote:typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
I think the word is bewildered
by spintwin » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:27 pm
Pidge wrote:automaticwicky wrote:typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
I think the word is bewildered
Its OK..... Comsuing alcohol at a game = having 1 unregistered player that we were notified about after he had played 3 or 4 games.
by auto » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:29 pm
spintwin wrote:Pidge wrote:automaticwicky wrote:typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
I think the word is bewildered
Its OK..... Comsuing alcohol at a game = having 1 unregistered player that we were notified about after he had played 3 or 4 games.
It dose look a little harsh from an outsider. I hope everything gets sorted out and you guys stay in this comp
by Magpies96 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:30 pm
Pidge wrote:automaticwicky wrote:typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
I think the word is bewildered
Its OK..... Comsuing alcohol at a game = having 1 unregistered player that we were notified about after he had played 3 or 4 games.
by Punk Rooster » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:32 pm
Magpies96 wrote:Pidge wrote:automaticwicky wrote:typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
I think the word is bewildered
Its OK..... Comsuing alcohol at a game = having 1 unregistered player that we were notified about after he had played 3 or 4 games.
Dont worry about it Pidge, we will be posting on another Cricket Association forum next year.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Pidge » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:32 pm
by Pidge » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:33 pm
by Punk Rooster » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:35 pm
typewriter wrote:Denied the 2007-2008 premiership due to heat.
Denied the 2008-2009 premiership due to a technicality.
Must be hurting down there at Fitzroy...?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:49 pm
Pidge wrote:Well next season Phantom, Carey and Carey 18 will have nothing to talk about then. As it will be mainly Para($$$)lowie on here
by Punk Rooster » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:50 pm
carey18 wrote:Pidge wrote:Well next season Phantom, Carey and Carey 18 will have nothing to talk about then. As it will be mainly Para($$$)lowie on here
Mate i have no idea where you get the $$$ idea from. Im on the committee and no exactly how much we spend on cricket
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:57 pm
by Pidge » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:02 pm
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 pm
by carey » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:14 pm
warren squire wrote:word on the street is that Paralowie were lucky to get away with it yesterday - the parkers were one wicket away from the outright, and should have got it.
word on the next street is that the paralowie captain made some interesting decisions during the match by declaring at 2/90 in the first dig, knowing that reidy was unavailable the following week, basically keeping the parkers in the match, and then instructing his tail to block it out with only 5 runs to get and the field in, which would have secured the outright and a guaranteed finals spot.
anyway, good luck in the finals and watch out for the new look parkers next season, we have just lined up gilchrist and hayden.
by Pidge » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:16 pm
by Pidge » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:17 pm
carey wrote:warren squire wrote:word on the street is that Paralowie were lucky to get away with it yesterday - the parkers were one wicket away from the outright, and should have got it.
word on the next street is that the paralowie captain made some interesting decisions during the match by declaring at 2/90 in the first dig, knowing that reidy was unavailable the following week, basically keeping the parkers in the match, and then instructing his tail to block it out with only 5 runs to get and the field in, which would have secured the outright and a guaranteed finals spot.
anyway, good luck in the finals and watch out for the new look parkers next season, we have just lined up gilchrist and hayden.
well i dont what street your on mate but it must be a real good 1 mate with 100% correct info pfffft what a load of s***t! yep we dec. on 90odd and your point being?????? we nearly did and still believe we should've won the game outright we were 3/187 chasing 203 with 15mins to and to rosies credit they took 5 for 8 in 10mins so as we only had 10 players and still needed 9 for the win off 2overs yep i told them to shut up shop play out the draw (1st inn. win) as i had info of the fitzys game and believed we had made the 4 by the skin of our arse. we hen got an edge through the slips for 4 which left us 8/199 had rosies got the wicket they would've made the 4 so mate just swollow your sour grapes and get on with it hey and any time you want to question me as a player capt. or in anyway i'm keen to sort that out with you.
by carey » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:19 pm
Magpies96 wrote:Played Eastside, I'm not suprised at all about the alcohol. Think it might be a problem each week.
As for the unregistered player, lets make it clear he has been a Fitzroy player for the last 5 or 6 years on and off and never played at another club.
All players are registered (in our case) by email, is email 100% safe? 3 match points is very harsh for something we were notified about after he had played 4 games.
Let me add, if we had been notified of the error after the first game played as an unregistered and it took us another 3 games to rectify the error due to our slackness I would agree with the penelty, but I dont agree when you first get told after he had already played 4 games.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |