smac wrote:It is now governed by the Mother's address, no more choice in those situations.
Kick mum out of home.
by Barto » Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:10 pm
smac wrote:It is now governed by the Mother's address, no more choice in those situations.
by Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:38 am
by Jimmy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:54 am
Dutchy wrote:2 page spread about this in the Mail today![]()
Looking at the boundaries Sturt have nothing to complain about, they have a huge zone from the city and 90% of the Hills which is one fo the fastest growing areas in Australia and a massive advantage of their country zone all being within a 2 hours drive of Adelaide
To give up a suburb to Westies who have suffered from teh drought in the Riverland and have the neighbouring suburbs anyway makes sense
Also I dont see the Blackwood FC complaining about their new West Adelaide recruit, 2007 B & F winner Simon McCormick, if anything this is the perfect opportunity for them to bed a good relationship with Westies as Simon is still involved at the Bloods
by Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:01 am
by Jimmy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:07 am
Dutchy wrote:They lose one club out of approx 60/70 in a growth zone to a club that has all the neighbouring clubs anyway
Sturt seriously need to start worrying about things they can control
by Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:03 pm
by BL&G_Ump » Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:21 pm
Dutchy wrote:2 page spread about this in the Mail today![]()
Looking at the boundaries Sturt have nothing to complain about, they have a huge zone from the city and 90% of the Hills which is one fo the fastest growing areas in Australia and a massive advantage of their country zone all being within a 2 hours drive of Adelaide
To give up a suburb to Westies who have suffered from teh drought in the Riverland and have the neighbouring suburbs anyway makes sense
Also I dont see the Blackwood FC complaining about their new West Adelaide recruit, 2007 B & F winner Simon McCormick, if anything this is the perfect opportunity for them to bed a good relationship with Westies as Simon is still involved at the Bloods
by redandblack » Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:50 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:13 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Voice » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:22 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:22 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Voice » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:27 pm
Wedgie wrote:I think the current system just looking at lads aged 10-19 is flawed, it should also look at the amount of football clubs in an area, not much used in getting a heap of teenagers that play basketball, hockey or soccer.
by spell_check » Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:23 pm
by topsywaldron » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:32 pm
redandblack wrote:They've got absolutely nothing to moan about.
by Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:39 pm
topsywaldron wrote:redandblack wrote:They've got absolutely nothing to moan about.
Sturt fans do love a good moan don't they?
Anytime they want to swap Mt Barker for one of Norwood's zones would be fine by me.
by Bluedemon » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:40 pm
topsywaldron wrote:redandblack wrote:They've got absolutely nothing to moan about.
Sturt fans do love a good moan don't they?
Anytime they want to swap Mt Barker for one of Norwood's zones would be fine by me.
by topsywaldron » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:34 pm
Dutchy wrote:They certainly dont want to mention what they have got
by Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:53 pm
kookas wrote: We can recruit the next players to play for the socceroos.
by Barto » Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:55 am
by Ronnie » Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:11 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |