by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:23 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:26 am
carey18 wrote:I dont really care who loves who and how doesnt. I just want to no if we are in or not!. I have a Jimmy Barnes concert to go to next sat night. When will we find out what is right. Would be good to see you blokes stop sooking about crap and move. people play where they want to and its up to them not others. Fair dinkum
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:29 am
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:30 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:33 am
carey18 wrote:Oh and Mr Gossiper if we go on past performances seasons ago to get a start in the rep team, i made 213no a few years ago. Where,s my start lol. Agaisnt Vista to!!! lol
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:34 am
carey18 wrote:When do you think we might find out about the ladder?
by bloodybouncer » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:02 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:carey18 wrote:When do you think we might find out about the ladder?
Tomorrow night..
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:07 am
by spintwin » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:16 am
bloodybouncer wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:carey18 wrote:When do you think we might find out about the ladder?
Tomorrow night..
PARALOWIE DEFINATELY IN FROM MY CALCULATIONS....unless i have been given the wrong scores!!!
good effort by the boys. they should have won outight though and put us roy boys out of our misery early!!
3 point deduction has hurt us dearly. The exec have ALOT to answer for frivously deducting us these points. i wonder if they will be all gabbling amongst each other again next year to find another way screw fitzroy over....this may have been their last time. watch this space.
Hendo...better cancel Jimmy Barnes mate.......
NEK looked pretty solid. good bunch of blokes too. gonna be a tough game. whoever wins that game, will win the GF. If paralowie hold early catches, they will win.
Good luck to all !!!
by Magpies96 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:33 am
spintwin wrote:
BB I am not sure they pick on you. I hope you stay in the comp dont let some little things worry you. It will be a very good Div 1 comp next year. I think the teams will be the same as this year.
by warren squire » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:37 am
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:49 am
by bloodybouncer » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:06 pm
warren squire wrote:word on the street is that Paralowie were lucky to get away with it yesterday - the parkers were one wicket away from the outright, and should have got it.
word on the next street is that the paralowie captain made some interesting decisions during the match by declaring at 2/90 in the first dig, knowing that reidy was unavailable the following week, basically keeping the parkers in the match, and then instructing his tail to block it out with only 5 runs to get and the field in, which would have secured the outright and a guaranteed finals spot.
anyway, good luck in the finals and watch out for the new look parkers next season, we have just lined up gilchrist and hayden.
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:08 pm
bloodybouncer wrote:warren squire wrote:word on the street is that Paralowie were lucky to get away with it yesterday - the parkers were one wicket away from the outright, and should have got it.
word on the next street is that the paralowie captain made some interesting decisions during the match by declaring at 2/90 in the first dig, knowing that reidy was unavailable the following week, basically keeping the parkers in the match, and then instructing his tail to block it out with only 5 runs to get and the field in, which would have secured the outright and a guaranteed finals spot.
anyway, good luck in the finals and watch out for the new look parkers next season, we have just lined up gilchrist and hayden.
....lmfao
interesting point though. maybe they wanted to finish 4th and play NEK ?? grudge match from last year???
word on the street is that there was alot of phoning around for scores during all the div1 games.
by silent hour » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:10 pm
carey18 wrote:So we let the last wicket try smash the winning runs and if they get out we finsh last or we block out the last over after being on phone hook ups to find out the points from the other games. Dont no what streets you are driving down champ. Y should of the parkers got the last wicket?
by bloodybouncer » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:20 pm
Magpies96 wrote:spintwin wrote:
BB I am not sure they pick on you. I hope you stay in the comp dont let some little things worry you. It will be a very good Div 1 comp next year. I think the teams will be the same as this year.
Not sure they are little things, when you miss out on playing a grand final when it was clearly in the rules the game could be played at a later date which we were up for.
As for the 3 point deduction, I am struggling to find the rule stating a one point deduction per game that someone was not registered (even though he was always a Fitzroy player, and we were not trying to pull a swiftie).
Last year we didn't want to leave the comp, as it would like we were just spitting the dummy, and this year div 1 has turned out to be a cracking comp, but seriously enough is enough. I think that is the view shared by the majority at the club.
by bloodybouncer » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:22 pm
silent hour wrote:carey18 wrote:So we let the last wicket try smash the winning runs and if they get out we finsh last or we block out the last over after being on phone hook ups to find out the points from the other games. Dont no what streets you are driving down champ. Y should of the parkers got the last wicket?
not what I heard, you only had to score 12 runs of the last 4 overs and rose park had the field in. 3 runs an over should've been achievable to get an outright and ensure a place in the finals and not relying on scores from another game.
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:24 pm
silent hour wrote:carey18 wrote:So we let the last wicket try smash the winning runs and if they get out we finsh last or we block out the last over after being on phone hook ups to find out the points from the other games. Dont no what streets you are driving down champ. Y should of the parkers got the last wicket?
not what I heard, you only had to score 12 runs of the last 4 overs and rose park had the field in. 3 runs an over should've been achievable to get an outright and ensure a place in the finals and not relying on scores from another game.
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:26 pm
bloodybouncer wrote:Magpies96 wrote:spintwin wrote:
BB I am not sure they pick on you. I hope you stay in the comp dont let some little things worry you. It will be a very good Div 1 comp next year. I think the teams will be the same as this year.
Not sure they are little things, when you miss out on playing a grand final when it was clearly in the rules the game could be played at a later date which we were up for.
As for the 3 point deduction, I am struggling to find the rule stating a one point deduction per game that someone was not registered (even though he was always a Fitzroy player, and we were not trying to pull a swiftie).
Last year we didn't want to leave the comp, as it would like we were just spitting the dummy, and this year div 1 has turned out to be a cracking comp, but seriously enough is enough. I think that is the view shared by the majority at the club.
The constitution states that a points "may, as it considers appropiate,..." be duducted if the executive feels it necessary. Again this is soft wording, open to interpreation as i have been eluding to on previous posts.
there is so much i would like to say here but i wont. The cricket has been great, no doubt, but why would anyone want to play in any compettion where there is no faith in the system, or more importantly, the lack of system.
i encourage the exec on this forum, and all interested parties, to look at the suburban rules and constitution. the rules are harsh, but clear. total transparancy in my reading. at least you know what you are in for. with churches, there is only gut feelings, or " as it consideres appropiate". Lots of must, will, shalls. Incidently, they would enforce a penalty of $10 for an unregistred player, not a match point.
Oh another thing, just to weigh it up, Eastside were docked 6 points for alcohol on the field in 2 matches....we have a supposed unregisted player in 3 matches and lose 3 points. Fair???
by carey18 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:27 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |