by Tooting Bec » Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:04 pm
by Howard » Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:10 pm
CountryVic wrote:Hey toot, not sure if you are a player, if you are and are not training although you know it's on - says a lot about why Bridgewater struggles, blokes not prepared to actually work a bit harder to try and succeed. I've used this word to describe Bridgewater's efforts before - pathetic
by The Muddy Roo » Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:24 am
by Holy Grail » Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:47 am
by GetTheSherrin » Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:29 am
by Gervais » Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:32 pm
by Amateur Footy » Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:57 pm
Holy Grail wrote:Heard a rumour last years under 17's mail medalist Tom Pope is making a move to Mt. Barker, can anyone confirm this?? this would mean both Pope brothers have jumped ship at ironbank, big loss for the club if they are leaving.
by ftandsq » Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:43 pm
Gervais wrote:was at the balhannah pub last nite and caught up with a couple of bridgy players. seems theyve been recruiting strongly. heard one of the fosdikes from norwood has signed along with the mclean chap already mentioned. also told more names about to sign.
things still quiet on the onkas front. seems to be more leaving than coming. can anyone update onka movements.
by The Muddy Roo » Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:51 pm
GetTheSherrin wrote:TMR, agree to some extent with ur comments, but still think to get a team from bottom to top in 2yrs and continuing then ur club/commitee are working harder than others. always sriving for that one more sponsor or recruit can be pivital in a clubs success and i think alot of club fall short there.. if ur turnover of players is better than other sides then i would say that uv worked pretty hard to get them. not too many premiership sides are put together by fluke..
by Amateur Footy » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:09 am
The Muddy Roo wrote:GetTheSherrin wrote:TMR, agree to some extent with ur comments, but still think to get a team from bottom to top in 2yrs and continuing then ur club/commitee are working harder than others. always sriving for that one more sponsor or recruit can be pivital in a clubs success and i think alot of club fall short there.. if ur turnover of players is better than other sides then i would say that uv worked pretty hard to get them. not too many premiership sides are put together by fluke..
Valid points GTS. My comments weren't directed at Mt Lofty alone, but your passion to your club obvious. Continuing on, another thing that influences a club success is $'s. I would suggest that rebuilding a club from bottom to top would be all but impossible without finance - you could be the hardest working club in the country but if you dont have it you'll struggle. Its dissapointing that hard working country clubs are folding due to this reason.
by MONTE CRISTO » Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:16 am
by ducks » Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:01 pm
by Amateur Footy » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:27 pm
ducks wrote:is there any one in the hills that really earns what they get paid or are they all over paid ?
by ducks » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:57 pm
by Tooting Bec » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:47 am
ducks wrote:just wondering on peoples thoughts if the players that get paid are they earning there money or are they over paid?
by Bat Pad » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:55 am
by Dashin » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:19 pm
by Bat Pad » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:35 pm
Dashin wrote:having said that from what i can gather there's plenty of blokes these days running around getting $100 to $200 a game that aren't worth a cold pie. Look at what Loby were doing two years ago, paying 5 or 6 blokes and only one of them would have gotten a run in a Mt Lofty side. These guys that expect to be paid are kidding themselves, clubs shouldn't have to pay just to add depth to their team, they should only pay quality blokes that are going to make that big difference to a side.
by Vision » Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:40 pm
by Vision » Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:41 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |