Glenelg v North Rd 20 2006

mal · Post by **mal** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:14 am

WEDGIE congratulations on the Safooty blooper of the year
Ian Perrie wins the game for North not Glenelg!
Dont despair mate you and your team had the last laugh.

mal · Post by **mal** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:17 am

bayman wrote:great game both sides had opportunities to win & north took theirs at the right time (for them) i at least hope that our players realise that they can more than match the top sides & the players from both sides should be applauded in they way they played it was quick attacking football & they (both sides) put their bodies on the line with no malice or spite & i hope my friend MAL at least watched the game so he can tell me that i'm wrong & we were suspect at "body pressure" as i dont think we are any worse at 'body pressure' than anyone else, i was proud of their efforts today

I cant recall having anything derogative to say about the Glenelg Football
club in any of my posts this year.

Post by **Wedgie** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 2:09 am

mal wrote:WEDGIE congratulations on the Safooty blooper of the year
Ian Perrie wins the game for North not Glenelg!
Dont despair mate you and your team had the last laugh.

All part of my reverse psychology plan as was pointing out the Bays being favs today. :wink:

Punk Rooster · Post by **Punk Rooster** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:40 am

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i dont think there is anything wrong with our inclusions this week i would have Rogers in instead of Duldig but losing willo both must play and Jack Horan has been really good in the ressies the last few weeks and deserves a call up

Duldig kicked 7...

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:22 am

Punk Rooster wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i dont think there is anything wrong with our inclusions this week i would have Rogers in instead of Duldig but losing willo both must play and Jack Horan has been really good in the ressies the last few weeks and deserves a call up

Duldig kicked 7...

Judging by the reports on "The Roost" and "SnoutsLouts" sounds like it was a cracker of the game. Maybe they should get a DVD of this game, send it to every primary school and make every kid watch it as an advertisement for the SANFL compared to the flooding AFL stuff they normally watch.

Well done to North, bad luck to the Bays, gotta re-group and prepare for the Dogs this week.

Come on Bays, you've worked too hard this year not to make the finals...

mighty_tiger_79 · Post by **mighty_tiger_79** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:40 am

Punk Rooster

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
i dont think there is anything wrong with our inclusions this week i would have Rogers in instead of Duldig but losing willo both must play and Jack Horan has been really good in the ressies the last few weeks and deserves a call up

Duldig kicked 7...

he may have kicked 7 and he did do his job yesterday but lets be honest the rooster dont have the best defense in the comp.

Pseudo · Post by **Pseudo** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 2:55 pm

Wedgie wrote:Just be glad they didn't take Perrie, a huge plus for the Bays that he's in our side.

! ! ! !

So you're the supporter Jars was talking about in today's writeup! (Sunday Mail, 20/8)

RoosterMarty · Post by **RoosterMarty** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:04 pm

A fantastic game of footy at the bay in perfect conditions. Much better than anything ive seen the AFL serve up this year!

Always sweet to beat the Bays even though we didnt play to our best, at least our forward line worked better yesterday.

Post by **Wedgie** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:16 pm

Pseudo wrote:
Wedgie wrote:Just be glad they didn't take Perrie, a huge plus for the Bays that he's in our side.

! ! ! !

So you're the supporter Jars was talking about in today's writeup! (Sunday Mail, 20/8)

Nah, actually it was another regular and let's just say he's not too happy about it either.

Did you read Peter Goer's mention of North supporters?

Damn we're a controversial lot!

Stevie_K · Post by **Stevie_K** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:04 pm

Only caught the second half.....i was shattered afterwards. Fantastic match though, even better than last time at the bay

sydney-dog · Post by **sydney-dog** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:48 pm

Can anyone confirm how Perrie and Hudson played ?

Post by **Wedgie** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:49 pm

sydney-dog wrote:Can anyone confirm how Perrie and Hudson played ?

Perrie was North's best, kicked 6 goals, 3 in the last quarter when the game was there to be won and Huddo was good but weirdly enough the turning point in the first quarter was when O'Hara replaced Huddo.

sydney-dog · Post by **sydney-dog** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:56 pm

Wedgie

Given the crows recent performanace, and the Sarge and Huddo's form over the past three weeks, how seriously do you think they will come under consideration

Post by **Wedgie** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:59 pm

sydney-dog wrote:Wedgie

Given the crows recent performanace, and the Sarge and Huddo's form over the past three weeks, how seriously do you think they will come under consideration

Sarge will be in, straight away no doubt.
I can't see him playing again for North as he's the sort of player that will be even better for the Crows than he is for North as he is a Crows man through and through.
Huddo I don't think will be as the Crows 2 ruckmen were 2 of the better players on Saturday and I couldn't see either dropped.

sydney-dog · Post by **sydney-dog** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:03 pm

thanks for the update wedgie

I thought Clarke was good in the first half and faded in the second while Biglands was not sighted in the first half and had a strong second half, so this weeks selection will be interesting

rod_rooster · Post by **rod_rooster** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:28 am

Perrie and Hudson were both very good. I agree with Wedgie that Perrie will play for the Crows from now on. Hudson had more game time this week and he rucked most of the last term. Did a great job but with Clarke playing well probably won't play for the Crows just yet. Not far off though. Would not be beyond him so one slip form Clarke and Huddo will take his spot. Hope for North's sake Clarke keeps playing well.

rod_rooster · Post by **rod_rooster** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:33 am

Whoops, double post :oops:

Jimmy · Post by **Jimmy** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:33 am

should north have won by more if they had kicked straight or was it as close as the score suggests?

Post by **Ian** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:01 am

Jimmy wrote:should north have won by more if they had kicked straight or was it as close as the score suggests?

With straight kicking North would have won by more, and had the game sown up earlier, but Glenelg also had their chances to shut the gate on North.

Stevie_K · Post by **Stevie_K** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:08 am

Bays applied great pressure going into time on in the last, it looked like a goal was coming and that would have sewn it up. IT just didn't happen that way and North capitalised on a tired Bays team.

Anyone at the game have a chance to talk to McConnell? or read his body language? not that you would point the blame at him but he would clearly had been feeling it after "that kick"

Glenelg v North Rd 20 2006

Who is online