hondo71 wrote:Some stayed on in RSA and live there to this day (Mike Haysman being one IIRC).
Would Haysman have been on the Australian Senior team radar back then? I'd always thought he could have been close but effectively killed any chance.
by JK » Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:17 pm
hondo71 wrote:Some stayed on in RSA and live there to this day (Mike Haysman being one IIRC).
by hearts on fire » Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:06 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:HOF you should get yourself a copy of a movie like "Cry Freedom" (Im sure other posters could suggest alternatives too)
by JK » Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:13 pm
hearts on fire wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:HOF you should get yourself a copy of a movie like "Cry Freedom" (Im sure other posters could suggest alternatives too)
I'll keep an eye out for it, unless you know where i can get it from, then i'll get it.
by Hondo » Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:16 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Would Haysman have been on the Australian Senior team radar back then? I'd always thought he could have been close but effectively killed any chance.
by McAlmanac » Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:00 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:McAlmanac wrote:Folks should do themselves a favour and check cricinfo for the scorecards of Australia's 1970 tour of South Africa. South Africa tore them up in all four Tests - Barry Richards' only Test matches. The margins are embarrassing. The Springboks were the best in the world at the time of their ban.
No doubt the South Africans were the best in the world at that time, but the margin was enhanced by poor programming by the ACB to take Australia from spinning Indian wickets to the quicker wickets of South Africa.
A lot of the players were suffering from poor health resulting from the Indian trip, and our key bowler Graham McKenzie was totally spent.
Ian Chappell claims he feels Souith Africa were the better team, but no way were they 4-0 better.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |