Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Should Sturt move from Unley to Mt Barker

Yes
51
53%
No
45
47%
 
Total votes : 96

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby Jimmy_041 » Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:07 pm

Pseudo wrote:
The Ash Man wrote:Stuff Mt Barker, move 'em to Mt Gambier, get rid of 'em.

Mt. Gambier is in Glenelg's zone. Would this mean the Bays could claim all the decent Sturt players? :-k


They already took Malcolm Greenslade.......
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14938
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 807 times
Been liked: 1241 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby StrayDog » Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:43 am

Dutchy wrote:
Thiele wrote:No. To far to travel by public transport


its closer than Elizabeth

Happy to be corrected, but from a quick glance at this, I reckon the best you'd from the CBD on a Saturday is an hour by bus (vs 35 minutes by train to Elizabeth, 40 minutes to Noarlunga).

Drive time from the CBD, I'd agree Mount Barker compares favourably or equally.



FWIW, here is what safooty posters were saying almost a couple of years back about the Blues playing the occasional game there, containing link to related Doug Robertson article.
"— here I opened wide the door; —
Darkness there, and nothing more."


- Edgar Allan Poe from " The Raven "

StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1445
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:26 pm
Location: Carpark.
Has liked: 1313 times
Been liked: 204 times

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby SnappyTom » Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:39 am

Barto wrote:
SnappyTom wrote:
Sojourner wrote:Should Sturt make the move from Unley to Mt Barker?


Mt. Barker, Western Australia - for sure.


I'd be in that, except with the price of petrol it would cost just as much to go to a home game.


Dead right...
The cats of Australia have made their choice!!!
User avatar
SnappyTom
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:08 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby TroyGFC » Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:13 am

does the train go up there, if so yes!
http://www.palmoilaction.org.au/

JUST SMASH 'EM TIGERS!!
User avatar
TroyGFC
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2545
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Meningie, formally at Warradale
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Meningie

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby Dutchy » Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:17 pm

StrayDog wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Thiele wrote:No. To far to travel by public transport


its closer than Elizabeth

Happy to be corrected, but from a quick glance at this, I reckon the best you'd from the CBD on a Saturday is an hour by bus (vs 35 minutes by train to Elizabeth, 40 minutes to Noarlunga).

Drive time from the CBD, I'd agree Mount Barker compares favourably or equally.



FWIW, here is what safooty posters were saying almost a couple of years back about the Blues playing the occasional game there, containing link to related Doug Robertson article.


i was talking driving, which would be most people choice of transport
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45975
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 4203 times

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby Punk Rooster » Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
The Ash Man wrote:Stuff Mt Barker, move 'em to Mt Gambier, get rid of 'em.

Mt. Gambier is in Glenelg's zone. Would this mean the Bays could claim all the decent Sturt players? :-k


They already took Malcolm Greenslade.......

& John Paynter...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby sturtpeter » Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:40 pm

Another valid point: Attendances would more than likely drop by 30-40%.

Not a great move.
Avid Sturt supporter and SANFL fanatic.
User avatar
sturtpeter
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:11 am
Location: Parkside SA
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 4 times
Grassroots Team: Glenunga

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby Sojourner » Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:43 pm

sturtpeter wrote:Another valid point: Attendances would more than likely drop by 30-40%.

Not a great move.


Why would attendances drop SP?

The Mt Barker area is the fastest growing area in South Australia and is teeming with young familes who would most likely be the target audience of the SANFL?
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby heater31 » Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:22 pm

Sojourner wrote:
sturtpeter wrote:Another valid point: Attendances would more than likely drop by 30-40%.

Not a great move.


Why would attendances drop SP?

The Mt Barker area is the fastest growing area in South Australia and is teeming with young familes who would most likely be the target audience of the SANFL?



Yes but it would take time for those to get on board. Look at the Powder Puffs they have been in the AwFL for over 10 years and struggle to pull a decent crowd. Their trend is likely to continue until the next generation comes through with disposable income. The same would happen with this move. The die hard city based fans will be alienated and refuse to go past the toll gate and the delicate financial position of the club probably would not cope with the transition.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16652
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 532 times
Been liked: 1286 times

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby Sojourner » Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:46 pm

heater31 wrote:Yes but it would take time for those to get on board. Look at the Powder Puffs they have been in the AwFL for over 10 years and struggle to pull a decent crowd. Their trend is likely to continue until the next generation comes through with disposable income. The same would happen with this move. The die hard city based fans will be alienated and refuse to go past the toll gate and the delicate financial position of the club probably would not cope with the transition.


I dont totally agree that a comparison between the Smears and Sturt is perhaps the best example, the Smears are hated by most people that dont barrack for the Port Adelaide Magpies and were always going to struggle to get good attendance figures with only a smaller group of the football community to draw from!

I dont disagree either that a number of supporters of the club would be likely to turn their back on the club if the move happened. One of the things that is kneecapping Sturt at the moment is the whole "tradition" aspect and the expectation that the club must remain at Unley Oval. It is my thoughts that if it did so happen that Sturt went to a position of impending bankruptcy where the recievers were to be called in and the President addressed a special meeting of the club and stated that the only way the club could be saved would be the move to Mt Barker, that it would happen that still a number of members would remain against the move and would prefer to see the club fold than any aspect of its "tradition" be changed. :(
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby therisingblues » Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:48 am

Sojourner wrote:It is my thoughts that if it did so happen that Sturt went to a position of impending bankruptcy where the recievers were to be called in and the President addressed a special meeting of the club and stated that the only way the club could be saved would be the move to Mt Barker, that it would happen that still a number of members would remain against the move and would prefer to see the club fold than any aspect of its "tradition" be changed. :(


Having once been in the situation where folding was a frightening reality I can't see anybody acting as has been suggested above. Tradition is not such a constrictive convention at the SFC, but the strengths that can be drawn from it was what saved us when our backs were to the wall in the mid 90's. We fought tooth and nail to survive alone rather than go for the lifeline of merging with North, and they chose to do the same rather than merge with us. Relocating to somewhere else within our club's zone is in no way comparable to that horrific pair of choices, and said relocation would never bring up as deep an emotion that pervaded at that time. The only situation that would ever cause a number of Sturt supporters to declare a preference for folding would be the prospect of merging with another club.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby smithy » Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:19 am

What makes people think that the Mt Barker council are going to be more welcoming or helpful than the current Unley COuncil ?
smithy
 

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby Dan The Man » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:55 am

If a suitable venue is found,it would be good to see Sturt play maybe 2 games a year there and see how it goes.
Dan The Man
Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:05 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby The Ash Man » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:28 am

smithy wrote:What makes people think that the Mt Barker council are going to be more welcoming or helpful than the current Unley COuncil ?


I hope that comment is tongue in cheek
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5510
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker

Postby Inflight » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:55 pm

Have they got electricity at Mount Barker and are the roads seeled? What about running water???

Surely this must be a consideration!!

Sturt is Unley as much as Alberton is Port Adelaide and the Parade is Norwood

Leave them there
Show me a good loser and I'll show you a loser.
User avatar
Inflight
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:23 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: stampy and 31 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |