by Dogmatic » Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:10 am
by rod_rooster » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:03 am
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:NFC wrote:The problem is this isn't our best side. waffle waffle
Not bad, not bad at all. At the risk of Roddy Rooster having a rolly eyes aneurysm I reckon Watson (no matter what an unpleasant character he appears) has to be given a trot next test. Does Hayden really have to be given another test? they did'nt give Healy (thank Christ) G Marsh or anyone who was'nt a ''marketing face'' that honour, Even Hussey could be given the hint that perform or no tour for you.
Unfortunately for Australia to rebuild before the Ashes KFC & Toyota would have to recast just about all their commercials, won't happen & CA will again be told the selection criteria by the sponsors, or so it seems.
-just for the record took the $13.50 Australia this morning, just going on the ebbing & flowing of the game so far.
by redwhiteandblueblooded » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:06 am
by rod_rooster » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:08 am
by redwhiteandblueblooded » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:11 am
by redwhiteandblueblooded » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:13 am
by rod_rooster » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:16 am
redwhiteandblueblooded wrote:Harking back, can anyone say why Katich wasn't given a bowl?Everyone knows that SA can't play leg-spin.
Ok' he may have a sore shoulder but it's ok to bowl Lee with a broken foot?
WTF is going on with the ACB?
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:24 am
by Sheik Yerbouti » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:26 am
by redwhiteandblueblooded » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:34 am
by MagicKiwi » Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:57 am
by rod_rooster » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:01 am
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:rod_rooster wrote:No need for rolling eyes Sheik. Perhaps if Watto could wash his hands without breaking down he could get a run but unfortunately for him he's more injury prone than Bruce Reid. I do feel sorry for the bloke though so please don't suggest i take any delight in this news.
Agree, but every time anyone suggests Watson over Symonds your puter seems to have an overdose of smilley winky roll eyes thingys. & yes, good chance he'll combust but we just can't keep this team as is, something desperately has to be done.
by locky801 » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:10 am
MagicKiwi wrote:The fat lady's warming up the tonsils....
by Rotter » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:40 am
by silicone skyline » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:44 am
by rod_rooster » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:46 am
Rotter wrote:Let me qualify one thing before I make my point. I wish for Australia to win series after series and am disappointed in this loss BUT if anyone doubts the good that can come of this for world and Australian cricket in general you're missing the big picture.
One more thing, some are calling for various heads to roll in the playing side, what about some of the selectors. Might be time for some changes up there as well. Hilditch & Co should make way for some different ideas that are a little more current e.g Lehman, McGrath & or Langer.
by Sheik Yerbouti » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:48 am
rod_rooster wrote:Sheik Yerbouti wrote:rod_rooster wrote:No need for rolling eyes Sheik. Perhaps if Watto could wash his hands without breaking down he could get a run but unfortunately for him he's more injury prone than Bruce Reid. I do feel sorry for the bloke though so please don't suggest i take any delight in this news.
Agree, but every time anyone suggests Watson over Symonds your puter seems to have an overdose of smilley winky roll eyes thingys. & yes, good chance he'll combust but we just can't keep this team as is, something desperately has to be done.
That's just because i get frustrated by the continual over rating of an incredibly mediocre cricketer in Watson. Even when he's fit he is average and he can't be relied upon to play for any significant length of time regardless. I agree we can't keep the team exactly as it is but Watto aint the answer to the current problems.
by rod_rooster » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:52 am
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Sheik Yerbouti wrote:rod_rooster wrote:No need for rolling eyes Sheik. Perhaps if Watto could wash his hands without breaking down he could get a run but unfortunately for him he's more injury prone than Bruce Reid. I do feel sorry for the bloke though so please don't suggest i take any delight in this news.
Agree, but every time anyone suggests Watson over Symonds your puter seems to have an overdose of smilley winky roll eyes thingys. & yes, good chance he'll combust but we just can't keep this team as is, something desperately has to be done.
That's just because i get frustrated by the continual over rating of an incredibly mediocre cricketer in Watson. Even when he's fit he is average and he can't be relied upon to play for any significant length of time regardless. I agree we can't keep the team exactly as it is but Watto aint the answer to the current problems.
No he's not, but what else is there? does'nt matter now, 6 month raincheck.
by NFC » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:01 pm
redwhiteandblueblooded wrote:Harking back, can anyone say why Katich wasn't given a bowl?Everyone knows that SA can't play leg-spin.
Ok' he may have a sore shoulder but it's ok to bowl Lee with a broken foot?
WTF is going on with the ACB?
by magpie in the 80's » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |