by Macca19 » Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:46 pm
by hearts on fire » Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:19 pm
by spell_check » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:06 pm
by UK Fan » Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:51 am
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by UK Fan » Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:56 am
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Brucetiki » Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:32 pm
by ca » Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:58 pm
Brucetiki wrote: The SANFL have listened to the people and giving them what they want.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:04 pm
by Barto » Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:42 pm
UK Fan wrote:FACT
"Most football supporters come from the northern and southern suburbs. AAMI Stadium is equal distance from both"
are you serious.??????
as opposed to a stadium in the city which is obviously an unequal distance between north and south.
what a brilliant point you make SANFL.
by Psyber » Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:49 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:19 pm
Psyber wrote:I would have thought West Lakes was easier to get to from the northern and southern suburbs than the CBD - at least by car.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by UK Fan » Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:27 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Voice » Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:36 pm
UK Fan wrote:So just to clarify in 2013 after these redevelopments.
AAMI stadium will have the exact same capacity as it does now. And it will not have a roof. What is the point ???.
by Rotter » Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:16 am
What's the point? as you ask. The way I see it history will only repeat itself from the eventual rationalization of grounds in Melbourne' The reality is for the good of the community in general, there must be a centralised stadium to add to the whole experience. Pre-game dining, post-game celebrations, ease of accessibility. These knuckleheads down at the SANFL have conveniently forgotten that the VFL/AFL spent thousands on another re-fit at Waverly but over time they realised they just couldn't keep throwing hand over fist because one notable difference - Joe Public didn't want to go there.UK Fan wrote:So just to clarify in 2013 after these redevelopments.
AAMI stadium will have the exact same capacity as it does now. And it will not have a roof. What is the point ???.
by Dogwatcher » Wed Dec 24, 2008 8:05 am
by Psyber » Wed Dec 24, 2008 9:31 am
by Dutchy » Wed Dec 24, 2008 2:23 pm
by Voice » Wed Dec 24, 2008 2:30 pm
Dutchy wrote:> They should make the bottom tier a moveable section so it can be moved onto the ground for Soccer/Rugby like the Dome and Olympic Stadium
by Brucetiki » Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:37 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Also, does this new development have any increase in shops/restaurants to increase the overall match experience of the punter?
by mick » Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:58 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |