MAY-Z wrote:
the bowler takes a lot more interest in what the ball is doing than the umpire as he has actually bowled it. if your vision was bouncing around you would never be able to take a cought and bowled
That's bullshit. You've obviously never played the game. It doesn't inhibit you to the extent where you can't see at all, but it is a lot harder to catch the ******* thing running down the pitch than it is t stand there.
To say the bowler has more interest in what the ball has done is crap too. They're both equally as interested, but one is in far better position to ascertain exactly what had happened with the delivery.
End of argument. I'm wasting my time arguing with someone who clearly has NFI.
It was a beauty.
.
