by spell_check » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:33 pm
by locky801 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:39 pm
by rod_rooster » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:41 pm
by locky801 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:42 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Need Watto to play the innings of his life now. Time to prove you are worthy of a spot in the side Watto.
by rod_rooster » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:44 pm
by dinglinga » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:44 pm
by FD88 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:46 pm
by dinglinga » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:49 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Drop Bear wrote:rod_rooster wrote:21.3 overs in that session. Deplorable over rate. It is actually farcical the delaying tactics the Indians are using although the Aussies weren't any better.
No chance of India speeding up anytime soon either!
Considering Dinagling was bowling most of that hour, 10 overs is absoultely disgraceful.
They aren't even being subtle about it. Harbajhan is stopping between balls to stretch a couple of times an over, he's been pulling out of delivering balls for no apparent reason then taking ages to go back and start again. Surely the umpires need to step in and hurry them along.
by rooburger » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:53 pm
by FD88 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:02 pm
rooburger wrote::? 5/156 on a road?
time to realize aust cricket is falling from the top.
we just don't have the depth at the moment.
by locky801 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:09 pm
by stan » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:22 pm
locky801 wrote:IMHO Haddin not up to test cricket standard with the bat or the gloves
by FD88 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:25 pm
by rod_rooster » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:29 pm
locky801 wrote:IMHO Haddin not up to test cricket standard with the bat or the gloves
by rod_rooster » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:31 pm
FD88 wrote:Eh, prepared to write this series off as one in which nothing went right and the team we played took advantage. We'll be back in a very short space of time.
by stan » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:36 pm
FD88 wrote:Eh, prepared to write this series off as one in which nothing went right and the team we played took advantage. We'll be back in a very short space of time.
by stan » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:38 pm
rod_rooster wrote:FD88 wrote:Eh, prepared to write this series off as one in which nothing went right and the team we played took advantage. We'll be back in a very short space of time.
The thing i'm afraid of is that a couple of blokes who are not up to it will get a shot at the very poor New Zealand side. These guys will do well and as a result be given an extended opportunity that they are not deserving of.
by rod_rooster » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:39 pm
stan wrote:rod_rooster wrote:FD88 wrote:Eh, prepared to write this series off as one in which nothing went right and the team we played took advantage. We'll be back in a very short space of time.
The thing i'm afraid of is that a couple of blokes who are not up to it will get a shot at the very poor New Zealand side. These guys will do well and as a result be given an extended opportunity that they are not deserving of.
No matter how bad the NZ squad is, they will give a good show of themselves.
by spell_check » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:40 pm
stan wrote:rod_rooster wrote:FD88 wrote:Eh, prepared to write this series off as one in which nothing went right and the team we played took advantage. We'll be back in a very short space of time.
The thing i'm afraid of is that a couple of blokes who are not up to it will get a shot at the very poor New Zealand side. These guys will do well and as a result be given an extended opportunity that they are not deserving of.
No matter how bad the NZ squad is, they will give a good show of themselves.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |