Gambhir appeal rejected

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Post a reply

Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:26 am

Great to see the BCCI not getting their way with this one.

http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,,24605113-23212,00.html
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby MightyEagles » Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:26 am

Good. :D
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Drop Bear » Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:58 am

rod_rooster wrote:Great to see the BCCI not getting their way with this one.

http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,,24605113-23212,00.html



Well what do you know! Hell has finally frozen over.
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:03 am

Drop Bear wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Great to see the BCCI not getting their way with this one.

http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,,24605113-23212,00.html



Well what do you know! Hell has finally frozen over.


Image
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby wycbloods » Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:14 am

MightyEagles wrote:Good. :D


My thoughts exactly.

Are they going to go home now that the ICC didn't bow to their demand? Oh thats right they are already home and now all we will hear is them sooking. I see the BCCI accused the ICC of having the outcome of the appeal pre-determined. They don't like any decision that goes against them and have the cheek to accuse the ICC of not giving him a fair appeal.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby smac » Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:44 pm

At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Booney » Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:55 pm

smac wrote:At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.


I think you will find that is Mrs.Boon...
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60909
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8033 times
Been liked: 11705 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:13 pm

Booney wrote:
smac wrote:At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.


I think you will find that is Mrs.Boon...


Thin ice mate thin ice! :lol:

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1761 times
Been liked: 1874 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby am Bays » Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:17 pm

Booney wrote:
smac wrote:At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.


I think you will find that is Mrs.Boon...


I'm hearing ya brother....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19613
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2081 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Media Park » Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:54 pm

They are talking about ignoring the rejection and playing him anyway...

Would that mean the match is not given Test status (for instance when Sehwag was banned for excessive appealing, but was played anyway), or would the result be considered a forfeit, and a drawn series?
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
User avatar
Media Park
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13864
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:28 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Dirko » Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:55 pm

MarblePark wrote:They are talking about ignoring the rejection and playing him anyway...

Would that mean the match is not given Test status (for instance when Sehwag was banned for excessive appealing, but was played anyway), or would the result be considered a forfeit, and a drawn series?


One would think it's be deemed a forfeit and Australia would win....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Booney » Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:21 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
Booney wrote:
smac wrote:At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.


I think you will find that is Mrs.Boon...


I'm hearing ya brother....


Beer soothes the soul my friend....beer.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60909
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8033 times
Been liked: 11705 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:25 pm

SJABC wrote:
MarblePark wrote:They are talking about ignoring the rejection and playing him anyway...

Would that mean the match is not given Test status (for instance when Sehwag was banned for excessive appealing, but was played anyway), or would the result be considered a forfeit, and a drawn series?


One would think it's be deemed a forfeit and Australia would win....


Imagine the riots. There is no way it will be ruled a forfeit. The ICC doesn't have the balls. The Indians will probably get their way again :roll: :roll:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:06 pm

MarblePark wrote:They are talking about ignoring the rejection and playing him anyway...


I'd almost like to see that happen so the world can finally understand what a bunch of wankers the BCCI are.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby CoverKing » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:09 pm

gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue

CoverKing out
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:26 pm

CoverKing wrote:gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue

CoverKing out


Yes by the laws it would be a forfeit. By the laws Pakistan refusing to play should have been a forfeit as well........
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Mythical Creature » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:29 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
CoverKing wrote:gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue

CoverKing out


Yes by the laws it would be a forfeit. By the laws Pakistan refusing to play should have been a forfeit as well........


It was!
If you don't like it, change it. If you don't want to change it, it can't be that bad!
User avatar
Mythical Creature
Veteran
 
Posts: 3581
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:22 am
Has liked: 189 times
Been liked: 240 times
Grassroots Team: United
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:50 pm

Mythical Creature wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
CoverKing wrote:gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue

CoverKing out


Yes by the laws it would be a forfeit. By the laws Pakistan refusing to play should have been a forfeit as well........


It was!


You might want to check that again.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,,23967134-2882,00.html
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby locky801 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:57 pm

Interesting 24 hours ahead one thinks :evil: :evil:
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 58653
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4390 times
Been liked: 1419 times
Top

Re: Gambhir appeal rejected

Postby Mythical Creature » Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:08 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
Mythical Creature wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
CoverKing wrote:gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue

CoverKing out


Yes by the laws it would be a forfeit. By the laws Pakistan refusing to play should have been a forfeit as well........


It was!


You might want to check that again.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,,23967134-2882,00.html


:oops: :oops: Sorry, I heard they'd changed it. I thought they'd changed back to Hair's original decision.
If you don't like it, change it. If you don't want to change it, it can't be that bad!
User avatar
Mythical Creature
Veteran
 
Posts: 3581
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:22 am
Has liked: 189 times
Been liked: 240 times
Grassroots Team: United
Top
Next
Post a reply
Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Advertisements by Advertisement Management