by mal » Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:24 pm
by RoosterMarty » Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:28 pm
by Killa » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:10 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:16 am
by Dogwatcher » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:21 am
by MADDOG3 » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:37 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:49 am
MADDOG3 wrote:The selectors won't do it. They're too in love with mediocre all-rounders...
by MADDOG3 » Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:29 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:MADDOG3 wrote:The selectors won't do it. They're too in love with mediocre all-rounders...
Speaking of mediocre all-rounders, are we going to see Maddog out having a hit soon?
by Drop Bear » Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:38 am
Killa wrote:only way part timers will work in the next test so that means watson and clarke needs to improve to help white which he took 3 wickets out of a possible 12 with another chance that rudi didn't call for a replay.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:59 am
MADDOG3 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:MADDOG3 wrote:The selectors won't do it. They're too in love with mediocre all-rounders...
Speaking of mediocre all-rounders, are we going to see Maddog out having a hit soon?
Possibly... I'm more of a specialist fielder though haha
On a more serious note, there is no way White is a test-quality all-rounder. Watson is very iffy day-to-day. Symonds is worthy of his spot when he is there. Problem is, the selectors are still struck by the 'Flintoff syndrome', the need for an all-rounder in the Test side, no matter what the quality. Of course, this is the successor to the Gilchrist variety which necessitated countries like England and India to play a batsman who could keep.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:00 am
Drop Bear wrote:Killa wrote:only way part timers will work in the next test so that means watson and clarke needs to improve to help white which he took 3 wickets out of a possible 12 with another chance that rudi didn't call for a replay.
Answer = A.Symonds.
But the selectors have their heads up their arses!
by NFC » Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:53 am
by Bold Strategy » Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:57 am
NFC wrote:Hayden
Marsh
Ponting
Hussey
Clarke
Watson
Haddin
Lee
Johnson
Clark
Siddle.
Too easy.
by Dirko » Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:57 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:00 pm
NFC wrote:Hayden
Marsh
Ponting
Hussey
Clarke
Watson
Haddin
Lee
Johnson
Clark
Siddle.
Too easy.
by NFC » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Bold Strategy wrote:Why drop Katich?? been australia most consistent batter this series
SJABC wrote:The Kat is injured isn't he ?
Side looks OK NFC....
by Drop Bear » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:02 pm
NFC wrote:Hayden
Marsh
Ponting
Hussey
Clarke
Watson (you're joking aren't you?)
Haddin
Lee
Johnson
Clark
Siddle.
Too easy.
by Drop Bear » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote: Have you got any foreign rashes there DB
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:05 pm
NFC wrote:Bold Strategy wrote:Why drop Katich?? been australia most consistent batter this series
Because the replacement is Marsh, aka the future of Australian cricket, aka the best timer of the ball I've ever seen.SJABC wrote:The Kat is injured isn't he ?
Side looks OK NFC....
Nah Kat isn't injured, and Hayden (rightfully) won't be dropped.
The only way Marsh realistically plays is if we kick out White for an extra bowler and replace Watson so Marsh can bat at #6. The first might happen, second won't (phew).
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:06 pm
Drop Bear wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote: Have you got any foreign rashes there DB
Have you been speaking to my doctor?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |