Paul Collingwood

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Paul Collingwood

Postby rod_rooster » Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:39 pm

Not calling back Elliott last night after Sidebottom flattened him leaving him short of his ground was a disgrace. At least he has admitted his error but i wish he hadn't said "i probably should have called him back". There is no probably about it Paul. New Zealand have been on the end of some poor sportsmanship over the years and whilst this is not quite as low as the underarm saga it is an embarrassment for Collingwood and English cricket. Glad to see the Kiwi's won in the end.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby silicone skyline » Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:50 pm

Remember a certain runout of Muttiah Muralitharan by a certain Brendon McCullum that wasn't all that charming.
Ruthless and Relentless
User avatar
silicone skyline
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6329
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Amsterdam
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby rod_rooster » Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:52 pm

silicone skyline wrote:Remember a certain runout of Muttiah Muralitharan by a certain Brendon McCullum that wasn't all that charming.


True but that doesn't make this incident any less disgraceful.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby hearts on fire » Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:54 pm

silicone skyline wrote:Remember a certain runout of Muttiah Muralitharan by a certain Brendon McCullum that wasn't all that charming.

Wasn't Murali going to congratulate Sangakkara on making his hundred and when Murali was running down to Sangakkara, McCullum ran him out!
~ R.I.P John McCarthy, 19-11-1989 - 9-9-2012 ~
User avatar
hearts on fire
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7104
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: naked
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ingle Farm

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby Stumps » Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:07 pm

hearts on fire wrote:
silicone skyline wrote:Remember a certain runout of Muttiah Muralitharan by a certain Brendon McCullum that wasn't all that charming.

Wasn't Murali going to congratulate Sangakkara on making his hundred and when Murali was running down to Sangakkara, McCullum ran him out!


correct- good footage on youtube
Stumps....
User avatar
Stumps
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:04 pm
Has liked: 60 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby gadj1976 » Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:55 pm

Pretty poor in my opinion. But, he did the right thing - admitted he messed up and should've called Elliot back, and good on him for admitting it.

Vettori was good in saying that Collingwood's admitted he made a mistake, move on.

At least, unlike the underarm incident, the result ultimately wasn't affected, so a good result for cricket IMO.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9254
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 799 times
Been liked: 870 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby jackpot jim » Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:47 pm

Stumps wrote:
hearts on fire wrote:
silicone skyline wrote:Remember a certain runout of Muttiah Muralitharan by a certain Brendon McCullum that wasn't all that charming.

Wasn't Murali going to congratulate Sangakkara on making his hundred and when Murali was running down to Sangakkara, McCullum ran him out!


correct- good footage on youtube


Murali deserved to be Run Out for being so STUPID. Geez, even kids know that u don't leave ya crease til the ball is Dead.

Can't compare the 2 incidents.
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6264
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby jackpot jim » Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:52 pm

gadj1976 wrote:
Vettori was good in saying that Collingwood's admitted he made a mistake, move on.



Pretty Poor on the NZ team not to shake hands at the completion of the game, even more so considering they WON.
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6264
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby bulldogs » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:40 pm

jackpot jim wrote:
Stumps wrote:
hearts on fire wrote:
silicone skyline wrote:Remember a certain runout of Muttiah Muralitharan by a certain Brendon McCullum that wasn't all that charming.

Wasn't Murali going to congratulate Sangakkara on making his hundred and when Murali was running down to Sangakkara, McCullum ran him out!


correct- good footage on youtube


Murali deserved to be Run Out for being so STUPID. Geez, even kids know that u don't leave ya crease til the ball is Dead.

Can't compare the 2 incidents.

agree two different incidents
bulldogs
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby MAY-Z » Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:16 am

rod_rooster wrote:Not calling back Elliott last night after Sidebottom flattened him leaving him short of his ground was a disgrace. At least he has admitted his error but i wish he hadn't said "i probably should have called him back". There is no probably about it Paul. New Zealand have been on the end of some poor sportsmanship over the years and whilst this is not quite as low as the underarm saga it is an embarrassment for Collingwood and English cricket. Glad to see the Kiwi's won in the end.


but surely the collision was accidental, therefore england would have every right in upholding their appeal. if a batsman accidentally snicks one for four he doesnt ask for those runs to be cancelled or when the batsmen deliberately get in the way of the ball for run outs by running up the pitch nothing happens then
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby smithy » Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:32 am

IMO they should take away the right of the captain to call someone back.
That was a rule when cricket was a gentlemans game which disappeared in the 70's.
Let the umpires and video refs have the final say on everything.
smithy
 

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby rod_rooster » Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:36 am

Can't agree with you MAY-Z. If a batsman is struck by the ball whilst running between the wickets and that ball rebounds to the outfield you never see the batsmen take the extra run even though they could. Why? Because it's not in the spirit of the game. Same applies to running out a batsman in this circumstance IMHO.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby wycbloods » Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:39 am

I am sure Paul Collingwood has a new nickname from the kiwis! Trevor. =D> =D>
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby MAY-Z » Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:47 am

rod_rooster wrote:Can't agree with you MAY-Z. If a batsman is struck by the ball whilst running between the wickets and that ball rebounds to the outfield you never see the batsmen take the extra run even though they could. Why? Because it's not in the spirit of the game. Same applies to running out a batsman in this circumstance IMHO.


but if the balls goes to the boundary in such instances they dont ask for the runs to not get added on do they, they just laugh and say it was unlucky- same here elliott was unlucky

and also if the set off for the runs and the batter and bowler collided and the bowler was impeded from getting a possible run out teh batters would still run and jsut say it was part of the game.
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby MightyEagles » Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:00 am

But you can't imped the batsman from trying to get a run.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby MAY-Z » Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:15 am

MightyEagles wrote:But you can't imped the batsman from trying to get a run.


it was accidental - you are also not allowed to obstruct the field from getting a wicket but batsmen do it all the time when they rn inbetween the stumps and the ball to stop runouts
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby Lightning McQueen » Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:37 pm

The bowler shouldn't have been in the spot he was in on the pitch anyway, I'm not a big fan of the Sheeplovers but fair enough for not wanting to go and shake hands. If you don't mean "thanks for the game" you shouldn't have to say it. It was a friggin disgrace and so he should've felt like a pinhead.

I bet he wouldn't have said he was in the wrong had they of lost, the look on Vettori's face said it all, I'd expect that sort of crap from div 15 amateur.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 53201
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4538 times
Been liked: 8447 times

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby Blue Boy » Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:20 pm

smithy wrote:IMO they should take away the right of the captain to call someone back.
That was a rule when cricket was a gentlemans game which disappeared in the 70's.
Let the umpires and video refs have the final say on everything.


Hey mate we only born on the 70s - I rekon it was still alright in the mid 80s when we were growin up and playin !!!
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby smithy » Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:45 pm

Blue Boy wrote:
smithy wrote:IMO they should take away the right of the captain to call someone back.
That was a rule when cricket was a gentlemans game which disappeared in the 70's.
Let the umpires and video refs have the final say on everything.


Hey mate we only born on the 70s - I rekon it was still alright in the mid 80s when we were growin up and playin !!!


Too much money now Blue Boy.
smithy
 

Re: Paul Collingwood

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:37 pm

I just wonder if Peter Roebuck is calling for Collingwood's sacking.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |