by Grahaml » Fri May 23, 2008 6:22 pm
Wouldn't work for cricket. Simple reason is there are 6 teams, and only 11 players in each team. Not to mention cricketers can play longer than footballers. In the AFL system you've got 22 players in 16 (soon to be 18) teams with a career of 10 years. There might only be only a handful of players in each "draft" year that go on to play regular first class cricket. Not to mention the fact that some cricketers mature later in life, while most AFL standard footballers are discovered as teenagers. Fancy telling a bloke who is killing the opposition at 29 that he must go into a draft the next year and then probably move interstate just to make the next step up because he wasn't a super talented 18 year old kid. A 29 year old cricketer has perhaps 10 years of cricket left, while a 29 year old footballer is thinking about retiring.
Cricket has shown it has it's own cycle that works well enough. Players move interstate for more opportunity early on and provide greater strength for that team later on down the track. Gilchrist is a shining example, and far from the only one. Because of the fact that cricket is far more an "individual" sport one great player can make a much bigger difference than one great footballer. You can't heavily tag Ricky Ponting. You can't play a loose man in front of Brett Lee. You can't choke off the supply to Stuart Clark. You can't drag Mike Hussey out of the play. The only tactics to beat these guys is to outplay them and beat them. If a footballer is better than you, there are ways to combat that. If a cricketer is better than you, you just have to wait and work your hardest for the chance to beat them.