S Demon21 wrote:Quichey wrote:Really. The club has never payed players. The club can't pay players. We struggle to pay the bills.
do you think the club would have been footing the bill?
What are you suggesting?
by Q. » Tue May 13, 2008 4:09 pm
S Demon21 wrote:Quichey wrote:Really. The club has never payed players. The club can't pay players. We struggle to pay the bills.
do you think the club would have been footing the bill?
by Sponge Bob » Tue May 13, 2008 4:11 pm
hawkseye wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:hawkseye wrote:Mate more research is needed again. Nathan didnt make Gepps Agrade because of his lack of commitment to training and other things. Is definately good enough, that year he ended up not enjoying his footy so went back to his mates. This year he chased money and has found himself in the same predicament. Captain cordial what flavour are you? Perhaps fruitcup?
I rest my case, lazy, overrated and continues to underachieve. What more can we say
Not overrated. Is he not allowed to play with his mates if things dont workout?
by S Demon » Tue May 13, 2008 4:14 pm
Quichey wrote:S Demon21 wrote:Quichey wrote:Really. The club has never payed players. The club can't pay players. We struggle to pay the bills.
do you think the club would have been footing the bill?
What are you suggesting?
by hawkseye » Tue May 13, 2008 4:16 pm
Captain Cordial wrote:hawkseye wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:hawkseye wrote:Mate more research is needed again. Nathan didnt make Gepps Agrade because of his lack of commitment to training and other things. Is definately good enough, that year he ended up not enjoying his footy so went back to his mates. This year he chased money and has found himself in the same predicament. Captain cordial what flavour are you? Perhaps fruitcup?
I rest my case, lazy, overrated and continues to underachieve. What more can we say
Not overrated. Is he not allowed to play with his mates if things dont workout?
He sure can, just wonder how long it takes for clubs to realise these blokes that continue to club hop cause more headaches than good. Your club should be well aware of that having had multiple case including the Carr family in recent times![]()
by Q. » Tue May 13, 2008 4:21 pm
S Demon21 wrote:Quichey wrote:S Demon21 wrote:Quichey wrote:Really. The club has never payed players. The club can't pay players. We struggle to pay the bills.
do you think the club would have been footing the bill?
What are you suggesting?
You're an intelligent bloke Quichey, I'm sure you can figure it out all on your own.
I'm not saying there's anything wrong with it either, if you can get blokes to come to your club that will help make a better side, more power to you. Even if it does cost a little bit...
by S Demon » Tue May 13, 2008 4:32 pm
Quichey wrote:Players still wouldn't have been getting paid, no matter which way you want to misconceive it. Anyway, we are discussing clubs that actually are paying players this year
by S Demon » Tue May 13, 2008 4:33 pm
factor wrote:Here is what i have heard..CLG are spending 30 grand...surely not as for WOS i would not be too sure...also would think that Heccies would be paying there big guys a couple of dollars
by Dragon Man » Tue May 13, 2008 4:39 pm
by The Big Shrek » Tue May 13, 2008 4:43 pm
Dragon Man wrote:WOS only have best player awards, no match payments.
by The Riddler » Tue May 13, 2008 4:56 pm
norm11 wrote:Dont think trinity pay anyone
by Scorpion » Tue May 13, 2008 4:58 pm
The Riddler wrote:norm11 wrote:Dont think trinity pay anyone
Trinity don't pay anyone....they don't even give money in their best players awards only vouchers from the sponsors.
by scottroo » Tue May 13, 2008 5:00 pm
by The Riddler » Tue May 13, 2008 5:03 pm
scottroo wrote:30 grand a year....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
how do you expect us to run a club and still have 30 grand left to pay players?
by scottroo » Tue May 13, 2008 5:05 pm
by The Riddler » Tue May 13, 2008 5:06 pm
scottroo wrote:you guys need to get over the fasination with clg paying players....good club, got facilities, good rooms, good coach =success not $$$
by hawkseye » Tue May 13, 2008 5:09 pm
The Riddler wrote:scottroo wrote:you guys need to get over the fasination with clg paying players....good club, got facilities, good rooms, good coach =success not $$$
was a simple question, isn't that the case?
by scottroo » Tue May 13, 2008 5:09 pm
by Scorpion » Tue May 13, 2008 5:10 pm
hawkseye wrote:The Riddler wrote:scottroo wrote:you guys need to get over the fasination with clg paying players....good club, got facilities, good rooms, good coach =success not $$$
was a simple question, isn't that the case?
Rooms are average. Does Greeny just play for the love of the game then?
by scottroo » Tue May 13, 2008 5:11 pm
hawkseye wrote:The Riddler wrote:scottroo wrote:you guys need to get over the fasination with clg paying players....good club, got facilities, good rooms, good coach =success not $$$
was a simple question, isn't that the case?
Rooms are average. Does Greeny just play for the love of the game then?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |