SAAFL Div 4 2008

[zedman]

"Winning div 7 and div 6 does not require toughness. All you have to do is not be fat and have an ounce of coordination."

shrek now you show your complete idiocy..thats is a disgraceful comment and shows your lack of knowledge of anything that doesnt fall into your backyard

the same thing could be said about you with that opening line about winning a div 6 or 7 flag!
thats the biggest load of crap i'v ever heard

carey ..put the bong down and read the posts properly..it wasnt me who said "Winning div 7 and div 6 does not require toughness. All you have to do is not be fat and have an ounce of coordination."..it was shrek..i was saying it was a disgraceful thing to say..i will accept an apology

[hawkseye]

"Winning div 7 and div 6 does not require toughness. All you have to do is not be fat and have an ounce of coordination."

shrek now you show your complete idiocy..thats is a disgraceful comment and shows your lack of knowledge of anything that doesnt fall into your backyard

the same thing could be said about you with that opening line about winning a div 6 or 7 flag!
thats the biggest load of crap i'v ever heard

carey ..put the bong down and read the posts properly..it wasnt me who said "Winning div 7 and div 6 does not require toughness. All you have to do is not be fat and have an ounce of coordination."..it was shrek..i was saying it was a disgraceful thing to say..i will accept an apology

Thats a bit rough but

[The Big Shrek]

"Winning div 7 and div 6 does not require toughness. All you have to do is not be fat and have an ounce of coordination."

shrek now you show your complete idiocy..thats is a disgraceful comment and shows your lack of knowledge of anything that doesnt fall into your backyard

the same thing could be said about you with that opening line about winning a div 6 or 7 flag!
thats the biggest load of crap i'v ever heard

carey ..put the bong down and read the posts properly..it wasnt me who said "Winning div 7 and div 6 does not require toughness. All you have to do is not be fat and have an ounce of coordination."..it was shrek..i was saying it was a disgraceful thing to say..i will accept an apology

What am I apologising for?

[hawkseye]

Im pretty sure Zedman wants an apology from Carey mate not you

[ouzo666]

I know this was on the last page and the issue is a bit dead but I've kept quiet on this but I can't sit here and listen to the b*llsh*t that snake_eyes is coming up with. I played last saturday for North Haven and I thought the game was played in good spirits and was under the impression that the adel lutheran boys were not bad blokes. They were well looked after in what are very good facilities (particularly compared to the rubbish at PAOC) were given beer vouchers and welcomed into our club. Unfortunately a bloke copped a reckless high tackle that could happen a hundred times and you walk away from it 99 of them. I feel sorry for this bloke and hope he makes a full recovery. But I'm not going to put up with this d*ckhead snake_eyes attacking the players and the club on this website. I'm sure that you have worn out your welcome at our club and I look forward to playing Adelaide Lutheran next time more than any other match this season I can guarantee the margin will be a lot more reflective of our dominance in the game and I hope that we increase the physical side of our game accordingly. See you on the 28th of June.

[Roaring Lion!]

Round 3 Tips (In Capitals)

CBCOC v Adelaide Luthern by 30 pts
FITZROY v Pultney by 24 pts
Portland v NTH HAVEN by 6 pts
P.A.O.C v Pooraka by 12 pts
MITCHAM v Unley by 42 pts

Good luck everyone as i think there will be 3 maybe 4 cracker games this weekend!

Oh am also interested in hearing about any info from Ressie's games after this round??

[The Big Shrek]

I know this was on the last page and the issue is a bit dead but I've kept quiet on this but I can't sit here and listen to the b*llsh*t that snake_eyes is coming up with. I played last saturday for North Haven and I thought the game was played in good spirits and was under the impression that the adel lutheran boys were not bad blokes. They were well looked after in what are very good facilities (particularly compared to the rubbish at PAOC) were given beer vouchers and welcomed into our club. Unfortunately a bloke copped a reckless high tackle that could happen a hundred times and you walk away from it 99 of them. I feel sorry for this bloke and hope he makes a full recovery. But I'm not going to put up with this d*ckhead snake_eyes attacking the players and the club on this website. I'm sure that you have worn out your welcome at our club and I look forward to playing Adelaide Lutheran next time more than any other match this season I can guarantee the margin will be a lot more reflective of our dominance in the game and I hope that we increase the physical side of our game accordingly. See you on the 28th of June.

Break out the video cameras boys! Make sure we get the king hits on video this time for the investigation.

[Super Coach]

I know this was on the last page and the issue is a bit dead but I've kept quiet on this but I can't sit here and listen to the b*llsh*t that snake_eyes is coming up with. I played last saturday for North Haven and I thought the game was played in good spirits and was under the impression that the adel lutheran boys were not bad blokes. They were well looked after in what are very good facilities (particularly compared to the rubbish at PAOC) were given beer vouchers and welcomed into our club. Unfortunately a bloke copped a reckless high tackle that could happen a hundred times and you walk away from it 99 of them. I feel sorry for this bloke and hope he makes a full recovery. But I'm not going to put up with this d*ckhead snake_eyes attacking the players and the club on this website. I'm sure that you have worn out your welcome at our club and I look forward to playing Adelaide Lutheran next time more than any other match this season I can guarantee the margin will be a lot more reflective of our dominance in the game and I hope that we increase the physical side of our game accordingly. See you on the 28th of June.

oh ouzo

[bucketts]

joompin who are your tips smarty

[am Bays]

I know this was on the last page and the issue is a bit dead but I've kept quiet on this but I can't sit here and listen to the b*llsh*t that snake_eyes is coming up with. I played last saturday for North Haven and I thought the game was played in good spirits and was under the impression that the adel lutheran boys were not bad blokes. They were well looked after in what are very good facilities (particularly compared to the rubbish at PAOC) were given beer vouchers and welcomed into our club. Unfortunately a bloke copped a reckless high tackle that could happen a hundred times and you walk away from it 99 of them. I feel sorry for this bloke and hope he makes a full recovery. But I'm not going to put up with this d*ckhead snake_eyes attacking the players and the club on this website. I'm sure that you have worn out your welcome at our club and I look forward to playing Adelaide Lutheran next time more than any other match this season I can guarantee the margin will be a lot more reflective of our dominance in the game and I hope that we increase the physical side of our game accordingly. See you on the 28th of June.

Hmm maybe another post to print out and send to Tynte St warning them that individuals from a club may want to stretch the boundaries of law 19.2 when they play a certain club.....

Ouzo might want to self moderate this post and change it or even better retract it all together, as you are declaring intent to increase the physical side of your game which is much more serious than reckless or negligent physical contact. This website will not tolerate being used as a vehicle to warn other clubs of an "increase [in] the physical side of our game"

[The Big Shrek]

I know this was on the last page and the issue is a bit dead but I've kept quiet on this but I can't sit here and listen to the b*llsh*t that snake_eyes is coming up with. I played last saturday for North Haven and I thought the game was played in good spirits and was under the impression that the adel lutheran boys were not bad blokes. They were well looked after in what are very good facilities (particularly compared to the rubbish at PAOC) were given beer vouchers and welcomed into our club. Unfortunately a bloke copped a reckless high tackle that could happen a hundred times and you walk away from it 99 of them. I feel sorry for this bloke and hope he makes a full recovery. But I'm not going to put up with this d*ckhead snake_eyes attacking the players and the club on this website. I'm sure that you have worn out your welcome at our club and I look forward to playing Adelaide Lutheran next time more than any other match this season I can guarantee the margin will be a lot more reflective of our dominance in the game and I hope that we increase the physical side of our game accordingly. See you on the 28th of June.

Hmm maybe another post to print out and send to Tynte St warning them that individuals from a club may want to stretch the boundaries of law 19.2 when they play a certain club.....

Ouzo might want to self moderate this post and change it or even better retract it all together, as you are declaring intent to increase the physical side of your game which is much more serious than reckless or negligent physical contact. This website will not tolerate being used as a vehicle to warn other clubs of an "increase [in] the physical side of our game"

Why can't you increase the physical side of your game? Tackiling, bumps etc. are all legit. How is increasing the physical side of your game against the rules? Although your post makes little sense, I believe that you are trying to point out that an intentional breach of the rules is more serious than a negligent or reckless breach. However, ouzo never mentioned breaking the rules at all. If you are saying that he infered that by saying they would increase the physical side of the game, that is a very tenuous connection.

Moderate yourself!

[am Bays]

Big Shrek, this site will not be used as a vehicle for individuals to imply or infer increase the physical side of their game towards other teams especially following a contentious incident that occured last week. We didn't come down in the last shower....

[The Big Shrek]

Big Shrek, this site will not be used as a vehicle for individuals to imply or infer increase the physical side of their game especially following a contentious incident that occured last week. We didn't come down in the last shower....

Footballers say that they will try and hurt eachother within the rules all the time. He was saying that. It doesn't infer there will be any more incidents outside the rules especially when everyone has been denying that it was a reportable offence.

You are acting like a silly too big for his boots umpire who is trying to infer there is something untoward to assert his own authority.

['00'02'03'07]

for a second i thought i was reading something to do with touch footy or maybe modified rules. Footy is a physical sport. Nothing wrong with that so long as within the rules.

[Westsider]

oh for fux sake - what a joke

[LMA]

no more triples liver need rest

[LMA]

Ouzo sounds like he 'd make a good coach someday?

[Super Coach]

joompin who are your tips smarty

already done them couple of pages back!

mitcam Vs unley Mitcam by 228 no thats not a type-o
F N Lutherans Vs Cbc 7a-side none contact & Dolphins baahahahhahahaahahahahahah
Fist Roy Vs Pultney Fitroy by 7
Poorland Vs CASH$$$HAVEN Haven by 32
Princess Ralphy Speed Vs Poo Raka Alfy opps Ralphy by 31

Also i must appoligise to Alfy Steed for using his name in place of Princess Alfred last week. Alfy contacted me and asked me to stop, he will be happy to see i am no longer using his name and he will no longer be associated with a college team!

[Hoodlum]

Well done to Haven lads yesterday! A real character building victory! Jake Watts, superb leader of the club and it was good to see a physical encounter within the rules. No player from either side whinged about the other side being dirty, game was played in great spirits. It is true that alot of bullshit whinging comes from college sides, so it was great to watch two CLUBS go at it.
Cox, Dempsey, Forest, Rowlands, Hinsley, Big Hood & Little Hood best for Haven. Good to see the Senior and Junior players playing well. Good signs.

[smac]

Well done to Haven lads yesterday! A real character building victory! Jake Watts, superb leader of the club and it was good to see a physical encounter within the rules. No player from either side whinged about the other side being dirty, game was played in great spirits. It is true that alot of bullshit whinging comes from college sides, so it was great to watch two CLUBS go at it.
Cox, Dempsey, Forest, Rowlands, Hinsley, Big Hood & Little Hood best for Haven. Good to see the Senior and Junior players playing well. Good signs.

Are you big Hood or little Hood?