by thegossip » Thu May 04, 2006 9:59 pm
by ORDoubleBlues » Thu May 04, 2006 10:14 pm
Supaveteran wrote:Who was the football visionary who decided that Div. I and Div II should combine.
by ORDoubleBlues » Thu May 04, 2006 10:22 pm
magpie in the 80's wrote:this happened in our league in the 80,s (hills league) not one div2 team defeated a div 1 team. that showed how much difference there was from the bottom side in div1 to the top side in div2. if i remember 3 ff,s had a 100 goals up by halfway through the season. 40goals to 5goals most weeks
by leftrightout » Fri May 05, 2006 6:34 pm
by stampy » Fri May 05, 2006 11:14 pm
by dont think do » Sat May 06, 2006 11:04 am
by qwerty » Tue May 09, 2006 3:12 pm
by steiger » Tue May 09, 2006 4:05 pm
by Valleysvirgin » Wed May 10, 2006 6:08 pm
stampy wrote:i find your comments and views very interesting virgin old mate and i do agree with a lot of what you say - in a nut shell the league is a joke with the top 5 or 6 miles ahead of the next 6 and then the also rans like aldinga/hackham. A couple of years ago i was an advocate of getting rid of brighton,marion,morpy parks - how could they be deemed southern? as you know i was involved up until recently with a middle table club and fair dinkum the people who run the joint wear rose colour glasses with crap like "we'll be right this year" we are getting so and so and this one and that one and in the end they end up getting a couple of cast offs from the stronger clubs which all amounts to nothing and nothing improves, but they are still in there competing so who are we to say which cluibs dont deserve to be in the league? as long as they meet certain criteria it will continue being the same old same old and those poor souls at my club will continue to live in false hope that their club will be great again and they will win flags. one last thing how can clubs like lonsdale christies beach porties morphett vale and hackham all prosper in the long term when they are so close in proximity to each other?
by Old and Grey » Thu May 11, 2006 9:40 am
by BM » Thu May 11, 2006 10:19 am
by the observer » Thu May 11, 2006 12:02 pm
by Valleysvirgin » Thu May 11, 2006 5:50 pm
the observer wrote:To start the process it need the League to come down firm
Clubs with two under 14's under 16's should lose this option
All of a sudden 60 other odd kids will be looking for a game of footy
They keep saying they will be lost to the game and wont go to these so called low clubs
but its never been tested. It is then up to these clubs to make them enjoy and want to stay
Give it a go
Brighton have had a excess for years Marion have struggle to fill all colts side
by GET A KICK » Thu May 11, 2006 7:48 pm
by Maddogmike » Thu May 11, 2006 7:56 pm
by Sherrin » Thu May 11, 2006 8:31 pm
by the observer » Fri May 12, 2006 9:48 am
by Jono » Fri May 12, 2006 12:19 pm
by BubblesOfBlue » Fri May 12, 2006 1:59 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |