PUNTER wrote:A3 was a fair quality comp but the bottom half qtr of the table a little shabby. Some of the A3 cricket I saw was better than some of the A2 cricket in my opinion. This has also been backed up talking to a few people that have seen both and even played in both.
Unley lost 3 minor round games in 2 seasons in A3 and back in A2 this season lost 6 games for the season. A2 is much stronger than A3, granted top A3 players are as good as good A2 players but overall team depth is much stronger in A2. Batsmen are more patient and teams bat deeper, bowlers are also more patient and teams have more options. Same as amateur footy with divs, the higher the div the more acomplished players each side have.