by am Bays » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:21 pm
by bayman » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:43 pm
by LBT » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:47 pm
bayman wrote:i agree with dropping him for fitness etc but tassie is the any player in grade cricket that is batting well enough to replace him ?
by smithy » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:50 pm
by GWW » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:57 pm
by rod_rooster » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Can anyone give me a plausible argument on why Cosgrove shouldn't be dropped?? When has he batted more than a session this year....FFS most talented batsman in the side and can't bat for more than 2 hrs FFS...
Christ the boy is as gifted technically as Clarke and Symonds if he got fit he could earn $1.5 Mill a year as opposed to $150 000 as a state player...
Will never earn that money though as he is a lazy F***
I can cop Adcock failing as he is no good but at least applies himself and is getting as much out of his ability as he can Cosgrove on the other hand is just one more Big Mac away from a heart attack
by LBT » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:07 pm
rod_rooster wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Can anyone give me a plausible argument on why Cosgrove shouldn't be dropped?? When has he batted more than a session this year....FFS most talented batsman in the side and can't bat for more than 2 hrs FFS...
Christ the boy is as gifted technically as Clarke and Symonds if he got fit he could earn $1.5 Mill a year as opposed to $150 000 as a state player...
Will never earn that money though as he is a lazy F***
I can cop Adcock failing as he is no good but at least applies himself and is getting as much out of his ability as he can Cosgrove on the other hand is just one more Big Mac away from a heart attack
Agree with your assessment of Cosgrove but disagree with your assessment of Adcock. He does work very hard but he hasn't got the most out of his ability. The guy can seriously play and i just cannot understand why he can't convert his ability into success at first class level.
by heater31 » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:38 pm
LBT wrote:rod_rooster wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Can anyone give me a plausible argument on why Cosgrove shouldn't be dropped?? When has he batted more than a session this year....FFS most talented batsman in the side and can't bat for more than 2 hrs FFS...
Christ the boy is as gifted technically as Clarke and Symonds if he got fit he could earn $1.5 Mill a year as opposed to $150 000 as a state player...
Will never earn that money though as he is a lazy F***
I can cop Adcock failing as he is no good but at least applies himself and is getting as much out of his ability as he can Cosgrove on the other hand is just one more Big Mac away from a heart attack
Agree with your assessment of Cosgrove but disagree with your assessment of Adcock. He does work very hard but he hasn't got the most out of his ability. The guy can seriously play and i just cannot understand why he can't convert his ability into success at first class level.
Is work an issue or is he concentrating soley on cricket this season?
by Dutchy » Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:03 pm
by mal » Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:03 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:09 pm
mal wrote:Is Cossie getting starts and getting out thru a lack of fitness causing FATigue ?
A 2nd innings failure could be FATal
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:51 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Christ the boy is as gifted technically as Clarke and Symonds if he got fit he could earn $1.5 Mill a year as opposed to $150 000 as a state player...
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:54 am
mal wrote:
This top order have not made a p/cup 100 this season !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 tons this year
167 BOOF retired
190 + 105* MANOU the keeper
118* GILLESPIE the bowler
by rod_rooster » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:02 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Symonds is the most gifted cricketer of his generation
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:06 am
by the joker » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:11 am
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:15 am
the joker wrote:Mark Cosgrove's 32 was vital on the green wicket.
"Those 30s are equivalent to 60s or 70s the way the wicket was playing," he said.
those were manou's words. you should give him a break i bet half you people on here are fatter than him
by rod_rooster » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:36 am
the joker wrote:Mark Cosgrove's 32 was vital on the green wicket.
"Those 30s are equivalent to 60s or 70s the way the wicket was playing," he said.
those were manou's words. you should give him a break i bet half you people on here are fatter than him
by mal » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:08 am
by am Bays » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:34 am
Rik E Boy wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Christ the boy is as gifted technically as Clarke and Symonds if he got fit he could earn $1.5 Mill a year as opposed to $150 000 as a state player...
Concentration and fitness issues aside that's bull5hit. Symonds is the most gifted cricketer of his generation and Clarke's footwork (except in his last dig LOL) is sublime. Both play all the shots in the book. Cosgrove is an out and out slogger IMO and nowhere near these two players technically.
While I agree that Cosgrove is good enough to win the baggy green, he'll never be a Symonds and Clarke even if he does get off his ar5e.
regards,
REB
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |