by brod » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:12 am
by Punk Rooster » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:35 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by locky801 » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:44 am
brod wrote:My biggest concern in this matter is the lack of evidence to back up the charge - It is nothing but heresay and the word of one group of people (Australians) against that of another (Indians). It is your word against mine and that such a harsh penalty has been handed down on the basis of such evidence does not sit well with me. To my recolection Singh has no previous record (if he does it was seven years ago) and as such the penalty does not fit this situation. I will add that that the penalty fits the CRIME, but with the available evidence the crime cannot be conclusively proved wihout doubt.
by rod_rooster » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:55 pm
by Mic » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:00 pm
by Cambridge Clarrie » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:34 pm
Andy #24 wrote:Have the Aussies bitten off more than they can chew with the racism allegations. It seems evident that the Australian team has made offensive remarks to other teams but cries foul when it happens to them. I understand that there is no place for racism but it is not the only way to overstep the mark. We should be prepared to temper our own behaviour now as we can't just pick and choose what we think unnacceptabley offensive.
3 matches is a bit harsh. Does anyone believe the kid is racist? He was probably overwhelmed and retorted to Symonds with the first thing he knew could piss him off. This kind of punishment will not change any underlying beliefs that spawn racism, nor is there any need for a deterrent. I can't see these kind of remarks becoming prevelant and the offenders claiming a precedent of an absence of punishment.
Show some maturity boys, shake hands and get over it.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:45 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote: Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.
by Punk Rooster » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:47 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:I love the fact that the Aussies find it acceptable to bag opponents in so many different ways but then become oh so precious when one of their own is allegedly called a 'monkey'. Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Blue Boy » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:59 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:I love the fact that the Aussies find it acceptable to bag opponents in so many different ways but then become oh so precious when one of their own is allegedly called a 'monkey'. Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.
What is it with Sturt supporters?
by purch » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:59 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:I love the fact that the Aussies find it acceptable to bag opponents in so many different ways but then become oh so precious when one of their own is allegedly called a 'monkey'. Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.
What is it with Sturt supporters?
Andrew Symonds objected to a racist taunt.
This taunt is not acceptable in the EPL, why should it be acceptable in Test Cricket?
The Aussies are masters of sledging, because they know there is a fine line, & they don't cross it.
Indians however are backwards when it comes to sledging, & they tried to take the Aussies on & lost- so they retort to racism.
Funnily enough, racism is definately not in the spirit of cricket, eh Anil?...
by smac » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:04 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.
by purch » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:12 pm
smac wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.
That's because (I am assuming here) you are a caucasian Clarrie.
I said in a previous post (can't remember which thread, might be time to merge some of these) that it is difficult to understand, being a white man in a white mans country. You have just proved that point a little further.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:15 pm
by am Bays » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:19 pm
by sasquatch » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:29 pm
purch wrote:smac wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.
That's because (I am assuming here) you are a caucasian Clarrie.
I said in a previous post (can't remember which thread, might be time to merge some of these) that it is difficult to understand, being a white man in a white mans country. You have just proved that point a little further.
What on earth are you suggesting smac? That dark skinned people look more like a monkey than caucasian people???
Now, really...when was the last time you saw a monkey?
by rod_rooster » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:29 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:It seems Brad Hogg will have to front an ICC disciplinary committee for allegedly calling the Indians "Bastards"
Reminds me of the alleged comment Bill Woodfull is meant to have said, when confronted by an angry Jardine complaining that he had been called a "bastard" by one of the Australian players,
Woodfull is alleged to have turned to the Australian dressing room and asked,
"which one of you bastards called this bastard a bastard?"
I understand that story is acrophyal because reports from players of the day is that Bill Woodfull, a school principal, had a much more polite command of the English language.
by smac » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:32 pm
purch wrote:smac wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.
That's because (I am assuming here) you are a caucasian Clarrie.
I said in a previous post (can't remember which thread, might be time to merge some of these) that it is difficult to understand, being a white man in a white mans country. You have just proved that point a little further.
What on earth are you suggesting smac? That dark skinned people look more like a monkey than caucasian people???
Now, really...when was the last time you saw a monkey?
by Dogwatcher » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:38 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:It seems Brad Hogg will have to front an ICC disciplinary committee for allegedly calling the Indians "Bastards"
by smac » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:39 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:It seems Brad Hogg will have to front an ICC disciplinary committee for allegedly calling the Indians "Bastards"
Tit for tat.
How can the Indians try and make an opposing player front a tribunal which they obviously have no respect for? Seems hypocritical.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |