Sojourner wrote:In the meantime though, why dont we run the current bus fleet on Bio-Diesel which has far less emmisions which also could help solve the problem.
Love your other ideas, but bio-diesel sounds like another of those bio-fules that I have heard so much bad press about. A few of the disadvantages of bio-fuels include:
*Pushing up the prices of staple foods in poorer nations, mainly because these fuels are usually derived from essential basics like corn. (as Psyber said, this could result in famine)
*In order to create space for the food for fuel there will be, (is now) increased destruction of rainforests, which are a very important "sink" for C02s and one of our greatest allies in the fight against greenhouse gases.
*Further fires being lit to clear the rainforests. A massive contributor to greenhouse gases.
The thing about these bio-fuels is that they sound good, organic and all, and they get the backing of the people that have spotted an angle to exploit. It would be very easy to tax, and would need to pass through a number of hands before the consumer gets it, same as regular gas, so that is pleasing to governments, and corporations, big and small.
The more people that hear the negatives about it the better IMO. We need to put our efforts into areas that our proven to be helpful to the cause. Scientific enquiry seems to uncover another negative aspect about bio-fuels every three months or so.
Until we can get solar working better, I am leaning toward nuclear fusion as the answer to our energy needs.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017