by matt » Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:14 am
by Tiger Couple » Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:53 am
by Shark_Hunter » Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:50 am
PUNTER wrote:Well what is going on at Adelaide High was talking to some Grange people on Sunday and they said they A Grade game was all over by tea on the 2nd Day and Adelaide High basically went down without a yelp and were pretty disinterested.
There are a few Adelaide High blokes that write on this what was the story? Was it ones of those games that you have in a season where you just wonder why you rocked up or whats the story?
Evening the bowling that has been there strength in my opinion looked to get a fair belting. I noticed Wazza only bowled 3 overs on the results is he injured or just wasn't working for him on the day?
by rainbow warrior » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:29 pm
Shark_Hunter wrote:PUNTER wrote:Well what is going on at Adelaide High was talking to some Grange people on Sunday and they said they A Grade game was all over by tea on the 2nd Day and Adelaide High basically went down without a yelp and were pretty disinterested.
There are a few Adelaide High blokes that write on this what was the story? Was it ones of those games that you have in a season where you just wonder why you rocked up or whats the story?
Evening the bowling that has been there strength in my opinion looked to get a fair belting. I noticed Wazza only bowled 3 overs on the results is he injured or just wasn't working for him on the day?
Well it was pretty embarassing Punter when the aim was to bat out the day for some confidence. Wazza was pretty crook the week before with some gastro and hence bowled very little and spent most of the innings fertilising the outfield......
Grange came out to bat and pretty much went at it like a 20/20 - it was some very good hitting and a little bit of luck that put them in an unbeatable position. The deck was helpful for the bowlers in the first innings but no excuse, weren't willing to work hard enough there. Second dig was very strange - blokes just kept nicking them, couple of 50/50 decisions and a belter of a catch and it was all over. Lack of confidence I think at the moment but something needs to be done quick to turn it around or the season will get away from us....
by Tiger Couple » Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:52 am
by Shark_Hunter » Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:37 am
PUNTER wrote:Good to hear a good honest picture of what went on.
Games like this either break you or bring you together? With Rechabites struggling a bit could be just the game you guys need to turn it around.
by Tiger Couple » Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:45 pm
by Shark_Hunter » Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:08 am
PUNTER wrote:Turf Open side knocked of CHurches by 10 wickets. Bowled them out in 28 overs and knocked the runs off in 15 overs.
With Adelaide and Suburban knocking of Para Districts it looks like it is all over in terms of making the Final for the Turf Boys as I couldn't see Churches knocking off A&S
by rainbow warrior » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:09 pm
Shark_Hunter wrote:PUNTER wrote:Turf Open side knocked of CHurches by 10 wickets. Bowled them out in 28 overs and knocked the runs off in 15 overs.
With Adelaide and Suburban knocking of Para Districts it looks like it is all over in terms of making the Final for the Turf Boys as I couldn't see Churches knocking off A&S
Excuse my ignorance Punter, but how does it work? Does everyone play each other once? Therefore can the ATCA side still make it with 2 wins (if they win their 3rd game)?
The coverage on the ATCA website is non-existent and perhaps another reason the games are not held in high regard by some of the higher quality players in A1.......(nothing against the blokes playing - at least they are out there....)
by carey » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:26 pm
by Rolls Royce » Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:23 am
by rainbow warrior » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:23 am
carey wrote:you guys were a much better side than us no doubt about it but to say we had batsmen who were scared is a little bit of an exageration i just think our shot selection was terrible at times when your right we needed partnerships i myself did'nt play any shots across the line or anything like and was not scared at all just played a bad shot and was caught at square leg i thought your opener was a very good batsmen (sanjay) but parkhouse was very lucky i had 5 or 6 lbw shouts at him and 2 of them should've been given but thats cricket and at the end of the day you's were a much better team than us and well done on a good game .
by carey » Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:21 pm
Rolls Royce wrote:Its those 12m follow throughs Shaun......![]()
From all reports Parky and Sanjay made you guys look second rate.
Mate, that comp has gone down hill in a big way. It was much stronger with the Hill's, Kieboom's, Janetzki's, May's, Morris', Tscharke's running around. That Churches assoc side you had on the park would struggle to be a lot of club teams....I would've feared for your blokes safety if Warren Mitchell was fit....
by carey » Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:26 pm
rainbow warrior wrote:carey wrote:you guys were a much better side than us no doubt about it but to say we had batsmen who were scared is a little bit of an exageration i just think our shot selection was terrible at times when your right we needed partnerships i myself did'nt play any shots across the line or anything like and was not scared at all just played a bad shot and was caught at square leg i thought your opener was a very good batsmen (sanjay) but parkhouse was very lucky i had 5 or 6 lbw shouts at him and 2 of them should've been given but thats cricket and at the end of the day you's were a much better team than us and well done on a good game .
You too mate. When I said scared I only meant one or two blokes or maybe that is their usual footwork I dont know. Was a good game. The batsman I rated the highest I think came in at #4 and batted for a while, but he too had the odd brain fade or two at times after doing hard yards but seemed ot get away with them. That left handed opener that hit me for that six in my first over off a good length ball though, I have no idea what was going through his head. He just wanted to play shots every ball. I think if he was more selective he would be a better player. I think you guys have potential if you are more selective. I think your bowling was fine, although from all reports the left arm bowler who bowled late was unlucky not to be an opening bowler. Anyway was good to be a part of the game and I did enjoy it. Best of luck against Suburbans, we need you to knock them off for us.
by playon » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:14 pm
carey wrote:rainbow warrior wrote:carey wrote:you guys were a much better side than us no doubt about it but to say we had batsmen who were scared is a little bit of an exageration i just think our shot selection was terrible at times when your right we needed partnerships i myself did'nt play any shots across the line or anything like and was not scared at all just played a bad shot and was caught at square leg i thought your opener was a very good batsmen (sanjay) but parkhouse was very lucky i had 5 or 6 lbw shouts at him and 2 of them should've been given but thats cricket and at the end of the day you's were a much better team than us and well done on a good game .
You too mate. When I said scared I only meant one or two blokes or maybe that is their usual footwork I dont know. Was a good game. The batsman I rated the highest I think came in at #4 and batted for a while, but he too had the odd brain fade or two at times after doing hard yards but seemed ot get away with them. That left handed opener that hit me for that six in my first over off a good length ball though, I have no idea what was going through his head. He just wanted to play shots every ball. I think if he was more selective he would be a better player. I think you guys have potential if you are more selective. I think your bowling was fine, although from all reports the left arm bowler who bowled late was unlucky not to be an opening bowler. Anyway was good to be a part of the game and I did enjoy it. Best of luck against Suburbans, we need you to knock them off for us.
our brain fade's at bad times was a huge point that our capt. made to us after the game but at the end of the day you guys were and our a much better side than us but i did still enjoy playing it and look forward to our next game against suburbans in feb.
by Tiger Couple » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:01 am
by rainbow warrior » Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:39 pm
PUNTER wrote:Talking to one of the guys looking after the Churches side they really only use these games as an idea for a side to head away to the National Churches Carnival.
They are out there to give it a crack but realise that just in competition size alone they are behind the eight ball.
I said good on them for getting out there and giving it a crack.
by Tiger Couple » Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:30 am
by Shark_Hunter » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:57 pm
PUNTER wrote:By the looks of the scores in the Paper the Bowling sides had the better on a very hot day.
I always found when I played it was easier to bowl/field in the heat as you bowl in short spells get a drink on the boundary line to help maintain concentration. Where as batting with all your gear on made it even hotter and harder to concentrate for long periods.
by tedbullpit » Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:14 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |