by redden whites » Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:59 pm
by Psyber » Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:34 pm
redden whites wrote:Maybe every other candidate had some idea of what they were doing and who they were representing.If you are an endorsed candidate then to be able to handle questions on policy surely is not too much of an ask.Anyone in the media had any right to ask genuine questions on policy and the girl made a fool of herself and the result against her was straight out embarrassing but reflective of her capabilities.I imagine the people of Boothby who are Labor voters( who didnt change electorates like I did to avoid even having to see her name on the paper)were insulted by this candidate.
It takes a little more that getting your name in the 2nd back page of the Sunday Mail darling.
by am Bays » Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:54 pm
by TroyGFC » Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:27 pm
by Hondo » Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:05 pm
by bayman » Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:45 pm
by TroyGFC » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:38 pm
by mick » Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:23 am
by smac » Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:45 am
by redden whites » Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:17 pm
hondo71 wrote:
Did those who her knock her actually hear her interviews or attend any info sessions .... or have you just taken the media grabs as gospel?
by redden whites » Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:32 pm
mick wrote:Handshin and Zappia at least had an interest in politics prior to this election and at least in the case of Zappia membership of the ALP. Nicole had none of this background, she was a real newcomer. Why was she picked ? A cynical attempt by the ALP hierarchy to get a few extra votes with a "celebrity pretty face". If Nicole Cornes is fair dinkum, she shouldn't give up, she'll at least have credibility and experience if there's a next time.
by redden whites » Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:34 pm
smac wrote:Experience at least Mick...
by Hondo » Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:38 pm
by redden whites » Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:54 pm
hondo71 wrote:Fair enough RW - you saw her in person which is one step ahead of me (I'm in Hindmarsh). I followed her progress on the radio only.
FWIW the story with the ABC Radio show on the Friday before the Election was that she was advised by the ALP head to door knock the local area that morning instead. Maybe they would do it differently next time but it was partly driven by the ABC's approach to Nicole during the campaign plus the fact that she attended a Community meeting on the previous Wed night or so where Andrew Southcott simply didn't bother turning up despite saying he would. Every other candidate attended what was a meeting with the Community rather than the Fri morning meeting with the journos.
by mick » Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:19 pm
redden whites wrote:mick wrote:Handshin and Zappia at least had an interest in politics prior to this election and at least in the case of Zappia membership of the ALP. Nicole had none of this background, she was a real newcomer. Why was she picked ? A cynical attempt by the ALP hierarchy to get a few extra votes with a "celebrity pretty face". If Nicole Cornes is fair dinkum, she shouldn't give up, she'll at least have credibility and experience if there's a next time.
Mick, I know what you are up to and please stop it.Please I beg you no more encouragement
have you not seen us cringe with embarrassment enough
stop feeding out that rope please.
by gadj1976 » Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:30 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:57 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by GWW » Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:01 pm
gadj1976 wrote:I haven't read the postings, but to answer your title - yes they do. Does John Howard know more about politics and the economy than Maxine Mckew - of course. Does she know how to actually run the country, of course not. But then she doesn't need to - she'll be sheltered from it all. Strange system our political system.
The ALP did it really well, recruit Garrett, Mckew et al and ramp them up. They won hands down despite Garrett selling out to all the Green supporters. {not surprisingly, at the moment, he's very quiet about uranium mining etc}
Good on them I say, the ALP did it well.
And I think you'll see the Libs do the same thing come 2010. They'll try and recruit higher profile people to battle against the already high profile candidates from the ALP.
The scary part is, it's becoming more like the US candidate race, where "public profile" means more than political standing and economic strategy is concerned.
by Psyber » Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:04 pm
gadj1976 wrote:I haven't read the postings, but to answer your title - yes they do. Does John Howard know more about politics and the economy than Maxine Mckew - of course. Does she know how to actually run the country, of course not. But then she doesn't need to - she'll be sheltered from it all. Strange system our political system.
The ALP did it really well, recruit Garrett, Mckew et al and ramp them up. They won hands down despite Garrett selling out to all the Green supporters. {not surprisingly, at the moment, he's very quiet about uranium mining etc}
Good on them I say, the ALP did it well.
And I think you'll see the Libs do the same thing come 2010. They'll try and recruit higher profile people to battle against the already high profile candidates from the ALP.
The scary part is, it's becoming more like the US candidate race, where "public profile" means more than political standing and economic strategy is concerned.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |