Lightning McQueen wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:
I was sitting in the Coca Cola box with a few of your ex-players behind me
They wanted to storm the changerooms at half time and take over
30 pack obviously, tight squeeze nonetheless.

by Jimmy_041 » Fri Sep 19, 2025 11:21 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:
I was sitting in the Coca Cola box with a few of your ex-players behind me
They wanted to storm the changerooms at half time and take over
30 pack obviously, tight squeeze nonetheless.
by Booney » Mon Sep 22, 2025 4:35 pm
by Brodlach » Mon Sep 22, 2025 5:29 pm
mots02 wrote:I’m not asking again
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Mon Sep 22, 2025 7:59 pm
Brodlach wrote:mots02 wrote:I’m not asking again
![]()
Should ask me, I “scooped” this one a couple of o ago.
by Brodlach » Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:08 pm
Booney wrote:Brodlach wrote:mots02 wrote:I’m not asking again
![]()
Should ask me, I “scooped” this one a couple of o ago.
Being a smart arse is what he's doing.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Trader » Thu Sep 25, 2025 3:51 pm
by amber_fluid » Thu Sep 25, 2025 4:16 pm
Trader wrote:Club sent out a member's survey last night.
One of the questions:
How do I feel about the diversity of the Fremantle Football Club's board of directors?
Not sure if it was PAFC's way of not letting me comment on our very own Sovereign Citizen in Wazza, or if it was just a mistake from the work experience kid who forgot to hide the fact he'd stolen the survey questions from Fremantle.
Either way, it was good to see the club is focused on the big issues, rather than worrying about things like how to win games of footy.
by Trader » Thu Sep 25, 2025 4:21 pm
by amber_fluid » Thu Sep 25, 2025 4:23 pm
Trader wrote:3 out of 5.
The rating system further highlights the stupidity of the question.
If I answer 1, expressing disappointment at the level of diversity, how do they know if that means I scored it low cause I want it increased, or did I score it low cause I felt there was too much diversity and I actually want it decreased?
by wenchbarwer » Thu Sep 25, 2025 4:26 pm
Trader wrote:3 out of 5.
The rating system further highlights the stupidity of the question.
If I answer 1, expressing disappointment at the level of diversity, how do they know if that means I scored it low cause I want it increased, or did I score it low cause I felt there was too much diversity and I actually want it decreased?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |