Booney wrote:Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:Rankine findings to be announced shortly.
Rumour is 1 week
That can’t be correct
Not a chance.
Bloke who told me has quite a few things correct. Probably winding me up
Should be 3 as LK said.
by Brodlach » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:16 pm
Booney wrote:Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:Rankine findings to be announced shortly.
Rumour is 1 week
That can’t be correct
Not a chance.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by am Bays » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:19 pm
Booney wrote:I wonder how many times the AFL social media team review their post before they click "Submit" on the various platforms?
by Booney » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:20 pm
Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:Rankine findings to be announced shortly.
Rumour is 1 week
That can’t be correct
Not a chance.
Bloke who told me has quite a few things correct. Probably winding me up
Should be 3 as LK said.
by Booney » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:30 pm
by Trader » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:40 pm
Booney wrote:I'm going with 4.
5 got leaked. Adelaide throw some punches. Lands on 4. AFL get their way. Adelaide get a bit back.
4.
Trader wrote:I'm fine with 4.
Let the crows drop the qualifying final if they desperately want him to play the GF.
Precedent says he has to get 5+, but I'm a big believer that you can set a new precent if the old precent was wrong.
Getting 5 games for using words is massive overs when you compare it to actions like Liam Baker thumping Peatling in the back of the head while he was face down on the ground and defenceless, yet Liam is being cleared to play the next week.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:46 pm
Booney wrote:I'm going with 4.
5 got leaked. Adelaide throw some punches. Lands on 4. AFL get their way. Adelaide get a bit back.
4.
by The Bedge » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:46 pm
Booney wrote:Rankine findings to be announced shortly.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:47 pm
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:Rankine findings to be announced shortly.
About **** time.
by wenchbarwer » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:48 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:Rankine findings to be announced shortly.
About **** time.
Shortly can be a long time.
by Booney » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:52 pm
wenchbarwer wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:Rankine findings to be announced shortly.
About **** time.
Shortly can be a long time.
Especially coming from Booney...
by MW » Thu Aug 21, 2025 3:57 pm
by Booney » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:10 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:16 pm
by amber_fluid » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:18 pm
Jim05 wrote:“The AFL arrived at the decision based on evidence from Adelaide, compelling medical submissions and its own integrity unit investigation”
WTAF????????
by MW » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:20 pm
by dedja » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:23 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Jim05 wrote:“The AFL arrived at the decision based on evidence from Adelaide, compelling medical submissions and its own integrity unit investigation”
WTAF????????
They literally rolled a dice
by Booney » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:24 pm
by MW » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:28 pm
by Brodlach » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:28 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Jim05 » Thu Aug 21, 2025 4:29 pm
He’s got Tourette’sBooney wrote:What, pray tell, is a "compelling medical submission" for calling someone a *****t?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |