by Dogs64 » Wed May 28, 2025 7:32 pm
by Dogs64 » Wed May 28, 2025 7:37 pm
by goddy11 » Wed May 28, 2025 7:53 pm
Dogs64 wrote:No Watkins or Jezza, not a good advertisement for Port's development of "magpies" players.
by Dogs64 » Wed May 28, 2025 8:06 pm
goddy11 wrote:Dogs64 wrote:No Watkins or Jezza, not a good advertisement for Port's development of "magpies" players.
I thought Watkins might be the best of the SA players. Obviously, the clubs didn't rate him, including Port.
by northerner » Wed May 28, 2025 8:24 pm
by whufc » Wed May 28, 2025 8:25 pm
northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.
Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.
This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
by Dogs64 » Wed May 28, 2025 8:40 pm
whufc wrote:northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.
Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.
This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
Agree but sadly you just have to watch the players reaction to Mani being drafted to see where the SANFL sits
It’s what the players want
by am Bays » Wed May 28, 2025 8:59 pm
by Hazydog » Wed May 28, 2025 9:18 pm
whufc wrote:northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.
Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.
This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
Agree but sadly you just have to watch the players reaction to Mani being drafted to see where the SANFL sits
It’s what the players want
by bertiebeatle1 » Wed May 28, 2025 9:33 pm
Dogs64 wrote:whufc wrote:northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.
Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.
This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
Agree but sadly you just have to watch the players reaction to Mani being drafted to see where the SANFL sits
It’s what the players want
I think all are happy for the player. But a mid season draft is complete BS. The players should get a minimum 18 month contract. It also would have been more tolerable in the pre reserves teams environment. At least then they'd still potentially be playing for you (if drafted by port or crows), and at a minimum not for a team you're competing against.
by Hazydog » Wed May 28, 2025 9:41 pm
by bertiebeatle1 » Wed May 28, 2025 9:47 pm
Hazydog wrote:And potentially reduce their attraction/convenience to some of the AFL clubs. I’ll assume that info won’t be made public or reported on.
by Hazydog » Wed May 28, 2025 10:54 pm
by TDJ44 » Wed May 28, 2025 11:48 pm
northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.
Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.
This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
by Dutchy » Wed May 28, 2025 11:51 pm
by TDJ44 » Wed May 28, 2025 11:52 pm
Dogs64 wrote:goddy11 wrote:Dogs64 wrote:No Watkins or Jezza, not a good advertisement for Port's development of "magpies" players.
I thought Watkins might be the best of the SA players. Obviously, the clubs didn't rate him, including Port.
Central should try to recruit Watkins, obviously Port don't rate him. Though with the extra $70k the sanfl gifted port/crows it makes it hard.
by Jim05 » Thu May 29, 2025 12:22 am
Dutchy wrote:
It was brought in to fix immediate needs of AFL lists, now its just an opportunity to grab talent prior to the next draft.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |