by Jim05 » Mon Apr 14, 2025 12:31 pm
by Armchair expert » Mon Apr 14, 2025 12:47 pm
wenchbarwer wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Good to known Trump has the physical health of prime Mike Tyson...
It's rapidly approaching North Korea-style bullshittery over in the US, isn't it?
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
by Brodlach » Mon Apr 14, 2025 12:59 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by woodublieve12 » Mon Apr 14, 2025 1:20 pm
Brodlach wrote:No matter what he does he wins by 100 strokes
by woodublieve12 » Mon May 05, 2025 1:55 pm
Booney wrote:
by Booney » Tue May 06, 2025 2:59 pm
by dedja » Tue May 06, 2025 4:15 pm
by Booney » Wed May 14, 2025 10:40 am
by woodublieve12 » Wed May 14, 2025 10:43 am
Booney wrote:Donny boy explaining how he's reducing the cost of prescription drugs by 70, 80, 90% in some cases which, when you think about it mathematically can sometimes be more. He's using a word he created, it's called "equalization".
I shit you not.
by wenchbarwer » Wed May 14, 2025 10:55 am
by dedja » Mon May 19, 2025 3:08 pm
wenchbarwer wrote:I'm still impressed he's accepted the Qatar Airlines plane for nix and then told all and sundry there's nothing to see here.
by dedja » Thu May 29, 2025 11:04 am
The decision on Wednesday from the Court of International Trade blocked one of the Trump administration’s most audacious assertions of executive power, under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, and sets the stage for a possible appeal by the White House.
“The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder,” a three-judge panel wrote.
Trump has used IEEPA to underpin most of his second-term tariffs—from duties on Canada, Mexico and China imposed over fentanyl smuggling to the far-reaching reciprocal tariffs levied in early April on virtually every U.S. trading partner. Trump later paused the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to allow for negotiations.
Congress typically holds responsibility over tariffs, but has delegated many powers to the president over decades. When he imposed the levies in April, Trump said the ongoing U.S. trade deficit had created a national emergency that has hobbled the economy and posed an unusual and extraordinary threat.
Wednesday’s ruling said that it would be unconstitutional for Congress to delegate “unbounded tariff power” to the president. “An unlimited delegation of tariff authority would constitute an improper abdication of legislative power to another branch of government,” the court said. Congress placed limits in IEEPA, restricting when and how a president could place levies, the ruling said.
The panel also said that the U.S. trade deficit didn’t fit the law’s definition of an unusual and extraordinary threat.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |