by storyoftheyear » Sun Feb 23, 2025 1:59 pm
by whitepointers » Mon Feb 24, 2025 1:15 pm
storyoftheyear wrote:What happened in the Mitchell Park v Country Club T20 thats led to a tribunal with a bunch of the Exec stepping back from it?
by storyoftheyear » Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:33 pm
whitepointers wrote:storyoftheyear wrote:What happened in the Mitchell Park v Country Club T20 thats led to a tribunal with a bunch of the Exec stepping back from it?
The game ended in a tie.
Between the final ball and the super over there was lots of heated discussion, but it was out of frogbox vision so you could only hear it.
Country Club won and took their shirts off and one even got carried off the ground, so it must've been quite heated.
Are you sure it went to tribunal ?
by Eagles2014 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 3:28 pm
whitepointers wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mprxThkftTk
by Off The Wall » Mon Feb 24, 2025 3:56 pm
Eagles2014 wrote:whitepointers wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mprxThkftTk
Was this posted to show the bloke run out pi55ed off with his partner, or the fact the wrong guy faced up to next ball?
by Moe » Tue Mar 11, 2025 12:50 pm
by Booney » Tue Mar 11, 2025 1:03 pm
Moe wrote:Section 1
ICC & Ramblers deciding midweek to a handshake agreement to not play last Saturday shows where this association is heading.
It may make absolutely no difference to ladder positions, but to me, it's piss weak.
by Moe » Tue Mar 11, 2025 1:41 pm
Booney wrote:Moe wrote:Section 1
ICC & Ramblers deciding midweek to a handshake agreement to not play last Saturday shows where this association is heading.
It may make absolutely no difference to ladder positions, but to me, it's piss weak.
Wait, what? Just looked at the score and while Ramblers had the points bagged why wouldn't they at least see what the first two hours held?
by Off The Wall » Tue Mar 11, 2025 1:58 pm
Moe wrote:Booney wrote:Moe wrote:Section 1
ICC & Ramblers deciding midweek to a handshake agreement to not play last Saturday shows where this association is heading.
It may make absolutely no difference to ladder positions, but to me, it's piss weak.
Wait, what? Just looked at the score and while Ramblers had the points bagged why wouldn't they at least see what the first two hours held?
Exactly my point.
ICC had quite a few out, yet you still rock up week 2 and play for a few hours.
It should be entered as an outright win/loss, or a forfeit.
by Booney » Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:28 pm
by The Dark Knight » Wed Mar 12, 2025 10:24 am
Quite a few out? Who were they missing apart from Styles who was suspended?Moe wrote:Booney wrote:Moe wrote:Section 1
ICC & Ramblers deciding midweek to a handshake agreement to not play last Saturday shows where this association is heading.
It may make absolutely no difference to ladder positions, but to me, it's piss weak.
Wait, what? Just looked at the score and while Ramblers had the points bagged why wouldn't they at least see what the first two hours held?
Exactly my point.
ICC had quite a few out, yet you still rock up week 2 and play for a few hours.
It should be entered as an outright win/loss, or a forfeit.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 12, 2025 10:34 am
Moe wrote:Exactly my point.
ICC had quite a few out, yet you still rock up week 2 and play for a few hours.
It should be entered as an outright win/loss, or a forfeit.
by Booney » Wed Mar 12, 2025 10:38 am
by Booney » Wed Mar 12, 2025 10:39 am
by storyoftheyear » Wed Mar 12, 2025 12:22 pm
Booney wrote:Without speaking to Moe or on his behalf I think his point is the association just allows players and clubs to do as they please, no longer do they run the show more so just watch on.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 12, 2025 12:51 pm
Booney wrote:Without speaking to Moe or on his behalf I think his point is the association just allows players and clubs to do as they please, no longer do they run the show more so just watch on.
by whufc » Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:09 am
Booney wrote:Without speaking to Moe or on his behalf I think his point is the association just allows players and clubs to do as they please, no longer do they run the show more so just watch on.
by Booney » Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:14 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:Without speaking to Moe or on his behalf I think his point is the association just allows players and clubs to do as they please, no longer do they run the show more so just watch on.
I don't think it tarnishes the integrity of the comp in any shape or form, umpire gets paid for doing nothing, save on new balls, gives blokes a Saturday off heading into the finals (especially when most Saturday's have been stinkers), gets a few more heads at the lower grades or you get to go have a peak at the teams you could be playing in the finals.
I loved my cricket each week but also loved a day off near the end of the season.
by whufc » Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:20 am
Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:Without speaking to Moe or on his behalf I think his point is the association just allows players and clubs to do as they please, no longer do they run the show more so just watch on.
I don't think it tarnishes the integrity of the comp in any shape or form, umpire gets paid for doing nothing, save on new balls, gives blokes a Saturday off heading into the finals (especially when most Saturday's have been stinkers), gets a few more heads at the lower grades or you get to go have a peak at the teams you could be playing in the finals.
I loved my cricket each week but also loved a day off near the end of the season.
While everyone is playing out in 36° you're in the pool or the pub enjoying a little freshen up in the second last round. Fair leg up I reckon.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |