Round 10 Port v West

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby mots02 » Tue Jun 18, 2024 12:22 pm

Wedgie wrote:The Power are contesting the Dixon decision.


Wouldn't it be better if the Magpies contested it?
User avatar
mots02
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3785
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 193 times
Been liked: 1233 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby Dogs64 » Tue Jun 18, 2024 12:32 pm

am Bays wrote:
bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again


How?

Based on these https://sanfl-content.imgix.net/content/uploads/2024/03/15091417/State-Territory-Tribunal-Guidelines_SANFL_2024.pdf

it's been graded the lowest possible conduct (careless) the outcome is severe based on the concussion - White will miss at least two games the only possible room for manoeuvre for Port is, is the contact high (four weeks) or three (body) - p 22 of the linked document.

Yep in the past this would've been included in a 2020's version of MMM Rockin' Footy DVD as one of those incidents we all loved 10 years ago but as we all know the our sport takes concussion much more seriously hence why we get this outcome (match review sanction) when players choose to bump.

As your most decorated Port Power player Kane Cornes (4 x BFs 1 x premiership) said on SEN breakfast on Monday - the bump is dead

PS these guidelines would apply if you were in the VFL competition, just quietly ;)

Won't White miss 3 games? Isn't 21 days if you're an SANFL player, but AFL players only take 14 days to recover? Another one of those unfair rules the AFL players have to endure.
Last edited by Dogs64 on Tue Jun 18, 2024 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dogs64
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Has liked: 404 times
Been liked: 254 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby amber_fluid » Tue Jun 18, 2024 1:01 pm

mots02 wrote:
Wedgie wrote:The Power are contesting the Dixon decision.


Wouldn't it be better if the Magpies contested it?


Who?
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15077
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:18 am
Has liked: 2346 times
Been liked: 2796 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby Wedgie » Tue Jun 18, 2024 1:21 pm

mots02 wrote:
Wedgie wrote:The Power are contesting the Dixon decision.


Wouldn't it be better if the Magpies contested it?

I don't think Collingwood care mate.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby Thiele » Tue Jun 18, 2024 2:01 pm

Dogs64 wrote:
am Bays wrote:
bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again


How?

Based on these https://sanfl-content.imgix.net/content/uploads/2024/03/15091417/State-Territory-Tribunal-Guidelines_SANFL_2024.pdf

it's been graded the lowest possible conduct (careless) the outcome is severe based on the concussion - White will miss at least two games the only possible room for manoeuvre for Port is, is the contact high (four weeks) or three (body) - p 22 of the linked document.

Yep in the past this would've been included in a 2020's version of MMM Rockin' Footy DVD as one of those incidents we all loved 10 years ago but as we all know the our sport takes concussion much more seriously hence why we get this outcome (match review sanction) when players choose to bump.

As your most decorated Port Power player Kane Cornes (4 x BFs 1 x premiership) said on SEN breakfast on Monday - the bump is dead

PS these guidelines would apply if you were in the VFL competition, just quietly ;)

Won't White miss 3 games? Isn't 21 days if you're an SANFL player, but AFL players only take 14 days to recover? Another one of those unfair rules the AFL players have to endure.
White should be available for the Norwood game on Sunday July 7th. That will be 22 days
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28399
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby knowledge » Tue Jun 18, 2024 6:05 pm

Thiele wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:
am Bays wrote:
bertiebeatle1 wrote:Great to see the SANFL embarass themselves again


How?

Based on these https://sanfl-content.imgix.net/content/uploads/2024/03/15091417/State-Territory-Tribunal-Guidelines_SANFL_2024.pdf

it's been graded the lowest possible conduct (careless) the outcome is severe based on the concussion - White will miss at least two games the only possible room for manoeuvre for Port is, is the contact high (four weeks) or three (body) - p 22 of the linked document.

Yep in the past this would've been included in a 2020's version of MMM Rockin' Footy DVD as one of those incidents we all loved 10 years ago but as we all know the our sport takes concussion much more seriously hence why we get this outcome (match review sanction) when players choose to bump.

As your most decorated Port Power player Kane Cornes (4 x BFs 1 x premiership) said on SEN breakfast on Monday - the bump is dead

PS these guidelines would apply if you were in the VFL competition, just quietly ;)

Won't White miss 3 games? Isn't 21 days if you're an SANFL player, but AFL players only take 14 days to recover? Another one of those unfair rules the AFL players have to endure.
White should be available for the Norwood game on Sunday July 7th. That will be 22 days


Only if he doesn't have a recurrence of symptoms in Stage 2 or 3 of the RTP. That may delay his return. I don't know what his concussion history is either. That could impact upon his RTP as well.
knowledge
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:41 am
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 79 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby PatowalongaPirate » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:28 pm

Dixon has plead guilty to hopefully reduce the suspension to 2 weeks.

Hoping to reduce from severe impact to high impact.
safooty Melbourne Cup Day Tipping Champion 2018 & 2019 #Back2Back
2018 safooty NFL Tipping Champion
User avatar
PatowalongaPirate
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
 
 
Posts: 6059
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:31 am
Location: Tiger Land
Has liked: 475 times
Been liked: 1314 times
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby Armchair expert » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:50 pm

He failed

3 weeks it is
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
User avatar
Armchair expert
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12040
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 9:18 am
Has liked: 414 times
Been liked: 1777 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby dedja » Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:07 pm

Bloody thug, should have got 6. :lol:
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23540
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 696 times
Been liked: 1585 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby mots02 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 10:01 pm

Lots of interesting social media commentary from port folk ‘he didn’t get him high, the player the concussion from hitting his head on the ground, Charlie didn’t hit him, Charlie did nothing wrong.’

Ummm …. Charlie pleaded guilty at the appeal :lol:
User avatar
mots02
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3785
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 193 times
Been liked: 1233 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby MW » Wed Jun 19, 2024 10:18 pm

mots02 wrote:Lots of interesting social media commentary from port folk ‘he didn’t get him high, the player the concussion from hitting his head on the ground, Charlie didn’t hit him, Charlie did nothing wrong.’

Ummm …. Charlie pleaded guilty at the appeal :lol:


My favourite "It's because Charlie is big"
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13845
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2767 times
Been liked: 2026 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby The Dark Knight » Wed Jun 19, 2024 10:45 pm

MW wrote:
mots02 wrote:Lots of interesting social media commentary from port folk ‘he didn’t get him high, the player the concussion from hitting his head on the ground, Charlie didn’t hit him, Charlie did nothing wrong.’

Ummm …. Charlie pleaded guilty at the appeal [emoji38]


My favourite "It's because Charlie is big"
It's ridiculous, from what I've seen some people commenting on the incident are delusion with comments highlighting that the SANFL are corrupt and biased against Port for the decision being upheld, others are trying to be funny suggesting that it's a blessing in disguise that he won't be playing in the senior side for three weeks.
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
 
Posts: 35551
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 pm
Location: Gotham City
Has liked: 11686 times
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby dedja » Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:00 pm

MW wrote:
mots02 wrote:Lots of interesting social media commentary from port folk ‘he didn’t get him high, the player the concussion from hitting his head on the ground, Charlie didn’t hit him, Charlie did nothing wrong.’

Ummm …. Charlie pleaded guilty at the appeal :lol:


My favourite "It's because Charlie is big"


That’s what his girlfriend says …
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23540
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 696 times
Been liked: 1585 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby mots02 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:19 pm

dedja wrote:
MW wrote:
mots02 wrote:Lots of interesting social media commentary from port folk ‘he didn’t get him high, the player the concussion from hitting his head on the ground, Charlie didn’t hit him, Charlie did nothing wrong.’

Ummm …. Charlie pleaded guilty at the appeal :lol:


My favourite "It's because Charlie is big"


That’s what his girlfriend says …


She gave him a 3 week ban too?
User avatar
mots02
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3785
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 193 times
Been liked: 1233 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby dedja » Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:19 pm

mots02 wrote:
dedja wrote:
MW wrote:
mots02 wrote:Lots of interesting social media commentary from port folk ‘he didn’t get him high, the player the concussion from hitting his head on the ground, Charlie didn’t hit him, Charlie did nothing wrong.’

Ummm …. Charlie pleaded guilty at the appeal :lol:


My favourite "It's because Charlie is big"


That’s what his girlfriend says …


She gave him a 3 week bang too?


EFA
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23540
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 696 times
Been liked: 1585 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby mots02 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:20 pm

The Dark Knight wrote:
MW wrote:
mots02 wrote:Lots of interesting social media commentary from port folk ‘he didn’t get him high, the player the concussion from hitting his head on the ground, Charlie didn’t hit him, Charlie did nothing wrong.’

Ummm …. Charlie pleaded guilty at the appeal [emoji38]


My favourite "It's because Charlie is big"
It's ridiculous, from what I've seen some people commenting on the incident are delusion with comments highlighting that the SANFL are corrupt and biased against Port for the decision being upheld, others are trying to be funny suggesting that it's a blessing in disguise that he won't be playing in the senior side for three weeks.


The ‘sanfl is out to get us’ narrative is constant and strong
User avatar
mots02
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3785
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 193 times
Been liked: 1233 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby am Bays » Thu Jun 20, 2024 9:08 am

mots02 wrote:
The ‘sanfl is out to get us’ narrative is constant and strong


That’s the funniest one of all along with the comment can’t wait to leave and watch it (the SANFL die)

Just shows how little of an understanding they (the vocal minority of Port fans) have of how footy in this state is funded and how the SMA works.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19652
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2099 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby Booney » Thu Jun 20, 2024 9:19 am

The Dark Knight wrote:
MW wrote:
mots02 wrote:Lots of interesting social media commentary from port folk ‘he didn’t get him high, the player the concussion from hitting his head on the ground, Charlie didn’t hit him, Charlie did nothing wrong.’

Ummm …. Charlie pleaded guilty at the appeal [emoji38]


My favourite "It's because Charlie is big"
It's ridiculous, from what I've seen some people commenting on the incident are delusion with comments highlighting that the SANFL are corrupt and biased against Port for the decision being upheld, others are trying to be funny suggesting that it's a blessing in disguise that he won't be playing in the senior side for three weeks.


It's got me beat mate.

For well over 18 months the onus has been on the player to protect the opponent, if you choose to bump and the player gets concussed you will be suspended. It's not more complicated than that.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61177
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8103 times
Been liked: 11802 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby wenchbarwer » Thu Jun 20, 2024 4:35 pm

wenchbarwer
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2210
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 12:30 pm
Has liked: 1227 times
Been liked: 498 times

Re: Round 10 Port v West

Postby Spargo » Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:13 pm


So he’s appealing the outcome of the challenge, after challenging the original decision. Where to if they’re unsuccessful again tomorrow?
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot

I’ll wait for an angel, but I won’t hold my breath
‘Magine they’re busy, think I’m doin’ ok…
Spargo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17154
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has liked: 6085 times
Been liked: 5495 times
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |