gazzamagoo wrote:IF a particular player should return to play for us in the next few weeks, mid-season, how do we fit him into the salary cap?
Surely Grand Central has a vacancy for a specialist barroom employee?

by Pseudo » Mon May 13, 2024 11:55 am
gazzamagoo wrote:IF a particular player should return to play for us in the next few weeks, mid-season, how do we fit him into the salary cap?
by am Bays » Tue May 14, 2024 11:46 am
gazzamagoo wrote:IF a particular player should return to play for us in the next few weeks, mid-season, how do we fit him into the salary cap?
by gazzamagoo » Tue May 14, 2024 6:01 pm
by Dogs64 » Tue May 14, 2024 7:25 pm
southernbulldog wrote:Whos spot does he take ?
by southernbulldog » Tue May 14, 2024 7:36 pm
by TDJ44 » Tue May 14, 2024 9:09 pm
Dogs64 wrote:southernbulldog wrote:Whos spot does he take ?
Such good news! I'd say Pickering, from last weeks side, 1 ineffective disposal round 4, then 4 disposals round 5 and 4 last game including a handball to Sturt for a goal. Ruck Thomas and Munn (guys that can mark). But Max Monaghan may be out anyway (test for injury).
by UK Fan » Tue May 14, 2024 10:31 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by gazzamagoo » Wed May 15, 2024 8:14 am
UK Fan wrote:Monty down back Kendall into ruck ?? Otherwise Beuchner has rucked before.
But Pickering does need to be replaced. Thomas has been better in the ruck
by northerner » Wed May 15, 2024 11:12 am
UK Fan wrote:Monty down back Kendall into ruck ?? Otherwise Beuchner has rucked before.
But Pickering does need to be replaced. Thomas has been better in the ruck
by northerner » Wed May 15, 2024 1:41 pm
by daysofourlives » Wed May 15, 2024 5:46 pm
northerner wrote:UK Fan wrote:Monty down back Kendall into ruck ?? Otherwise Beuchner has rucked before.
But Pickering does need to be replaced. Thomas has been better in the ruck
Maybe Kendall up forward (he came to us as a fwd) and Munn to ruck (with Thomas as backup).
Also, Harvey Howe in the reserves is an improvement in what we have at present, although at 19 he is still a work in progress.
by daysofourlives » Tue May 28, 2024 4:20 pm
by Dutchy » Tue May 28, 2024 4:29 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Ill ask again, why wouldnt Dyson Sharp be selected in our league side?
BOG in the SA U18s game as a bottom ager. Will likely go No1 in 2025 draft.
by gazzamagoo » Wed May 29, 2024 8:44 pm
by northerner » Thu May 30, 2024 10:59 am
daysofourlives wrote:Ill ask again, why wouldnt Dyson Sharp be selected in our league side?
BOG in the SA U18s game as a bottom ager. Will likely go No1 in 2025 draft.
by daysofourlives » Thu May 30, 2024 1:54 pm
northerner wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Ill ask again, why wouldnt Dyson Sharp be selected in our league side?
BOG in the SA U18s game as a bottom ager. Will likely go No1 in 2025 draft.
I think Clubs are more aware these days of Duty Of Care issues. Pushing kids through too quickly is risky, and should only be done if its in the best interests of the player, not the Club.
Dyson's going to be a high pick in 2025 regardless of what grade he is selected in this season.
My view is he could do a pre season with the Seniors and be a ressie selection early 2025 to allow him to adjust to playing against mature, physically stronger bodies, and see how it transpires from there.
by wenchbarwer » Thu May 30, 2024 2:06 pm
daysofourlives wrote:northerner wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Ill ask again, why wouldnt Dyson Sharp be selected in our league side?
BOG in the SA U18s game as a bottom ager. Will likely go No1 in 2025 draft.
I think Clubs are more aware these days of Duty Of Care issues. Pushing kids through too quickly is risky, and should only be done if its in the best interests of the player, not the Club.
Dyson's going to be a high pick in 2025 regardless of what grade he is selected in this season.
My view is he could do a pre season with the Seniors and be a ressie selection early 2025 to allow him to adjust to playing against mature, physically stronger bodies, and see how it transpires from there.
IMO you dont play kids like that in the Ressies and you dont hinder their development by keeping them in U18s where they dominate, too many bad habits creep in. Talented kids have always played against mature bodies all over the State. It is in his best interests to play League football. Kids were doing it 20-30 years ago when the SANFL was full of mature age fully developed players, now its full of 18-25yr olds who arent as developed physically. The game has never been safer so duty of care is a load of rubbish in this regard.
As long as the parents tick it off it should happen.
by Dutchy » Thu May 30, 2024 2:35 pm
by whufc » Thu May 30, 2024 2:52 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |