by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:09 am
by RB » Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:10 am
by mal » Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:10 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Well f**k me, it's not raining in Sydney and the sun is shining there.
And it's 1/0
by Booney » Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:15 am
by locky801 » Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:44 am
mal wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Well f**k me, it's not raining in Sydney and the sun is shining there.
And it's 1/0
And STARc gets another topender batsman out, he is lockying his status as an all time great Left Handed Test fast bowler
by Booney » Wed Jan 03, 2024 11:00 am
by Arry Gablett » Wed Jan 03, 2024 11:02 am
Booney wrote:Hitting?
by whufc » Wed Jan 03, 2024 11:03 am
Arry Gablett wrote:Booney wrote:Hitting?
Ball tracking is so hit and miss
To the naked eye it looked missing but technology is never wrong is it ?
by mal » Wed Jan 03, 2024 11:04 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Jan 03, 2024 11:42 am
by RB » Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:51 pm
by whufc » Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:54 pm
RB wrote:How does that happen? Such a Marsh-like error.
by DOC » Wed Jan 03, 2024 1:26 pm
by The Dark Knight » Wed Jan 03, 2024 1:43 pm
whufc wrote:RB wrote:How does that happen? Such a Marsh-like error.
The amount of wickets of no-balls says there has to be something in it.
That split second extra pace being closer to the batter must make just enough of a difference, a natural quicker ball i suppose.
by whufc » Wed Jan 03, 2024 1:45 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:whufc wrote:RB wrote:How does that happen? Such a Marsh-like error.
The amount of wickets of no-balls says there has to be something in it.
That split second extra pace being closer to the batter must make just enough of a difference, a natural quicker ball i suppose.
In Marsh's example I feel as though it's not a run up issue and bowlers are just striving that little bit too hard sometimes (potentially for extra pace) so that extra effort whilst running in lengthens their delivery stride and therefore they overstep.
Luckily it only cost 8 runs and Marsh nicked him off 11 deliveries later.
by locky801 » Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:08 pm
by The Dark Knight » Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:25 pm
whufc wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:whufc wrote:RB wrote:How does that happen? Such a Marsh-like error.
The amount of wickets of no-balls says there has to be something in it.
That split second extra pace being closer to the batter must make just enough of a difference, a natural quicker ball i suppose.
In Marsh's example I feel as though it's not a run up issue and bowlers are just striving that little bit too hard sometimes (potentially for extra pace) so that extra effort whilst running in lengthens their delivery stride and therefore they overstep.
Luckily it only cost 8 runs and Marsh nicked him off 11 deliveries later.
Yeah, i was more focusing on that the no-ball would result in a batter having a millisecond less reaction time, which potentially does make a difference when batsmen are dealing in such small reaction times.
by whufc » Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:35 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:40 pm
whufc wrote:On that note it surprises me we dont see bowlers more often try and bowl with only half a foot or one foot back from the line occasionally. Weve seen blokes bowl from as far back as the umpire but the more subtle variation would almost act as the perfect slower ball without having to change action or grip.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |