carey wrote:Now everyone on here are chartered accountants.
I love this site.
Some of us might have some business acumen and deal with balance sheets
by Brodlach » Thu Dec 14, 2023 7:51 am
carey wrote:Now everyone on here are chartered accountants.
I love this site.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Jim05 » Thu Dec 14, 2023 8:17 am
One thing I’ve learnt over the years is that there is a lot of smokes & mirrors when it comes to football clubs and their finances. I know everytime the the Essendon one is released I have a chuckle as they do their level best to hide the truthBrodlach wrote:carey wrote:Now everyone on here are chartered accountants.
I love this site.
Some of us might have some business acumen and deal with balance sheets
by Booney » Thu Dec 14, 2023 8:24 am
mots02 wrote:DOC wrote:Many clubs do it but there is no such thing as a profit for a Football Club.
It is a surplus.
Please refer above and do not take anything Mr Koch says too literally.
by Booney » Thu Dec 14, 2023 8:28 am
carey wrote:Now everyone on here are chartered accountants.
I love this site.
by Brodlach » Thu Dec 14, 2023 8:42 am
Jim05 wrote:One thing I’ve learnt over the years is that there is a lot of smokes & mirrors when it comes to football clubs and their finances. I know everytime the the Essendon one is released I have a chuckle as they do their level best to hide the truthBrodlach wrote:carey wrote:Now everyone on here are chartered accountants.
I love this site.
Some of us might have some business acumen and deal with balance sheets
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by mots02 » Thu Dec 14, 2023 8:53 am
Booney wrote:mots02 wrote:DOC wrote:Many clubs do it but there is no such thing as a profit for a Football Club.
It is a surplus.
Please refer above and do not take anything Mr Koch says too literally.
One is an opinion, one is a report, but you carry on looking up at us nonetheless.
by Booney » Thu Dec 14, 2023 9:08 am
mots02 wrote:I was talking about the semantics of reporting a profit v a surplus, but you carry on getting offending by the nasty people picking on Port.
by amber_fluid » Thu Dec 14, 2023 10:08 am
by Booney » Thu Dec 14, 2023 10:35 am
amber_fluid wrote:When the Port Magpies were winning premiership after premiership in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s I couldn’t tell you if they turned over a profit or not.
Didn’t care as it was all about winning premierships.
How things have changed!
Talking about profits and balance sheets over premierships now.
by dedja » Thu Dec 14, 2023 12:46 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Talking about profits and balance sheets over premierships now.
by amber_fluid » Thu Dec 14, 2023 1:10 pm
dedja wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Talking about profits and balance sheets over premierships now.
Well, there’s an easy fix isn’t there?
Approaching 20 years.
by Dutchy » Thu Dec 14, 2023 1:14 pm
carey wrote:Although i'm very disappointed in the fact i haven't heard 'Oh, now they can pay the SANFL back'
The predictability of this site has let me down on this occasion. I expect this to be a rare occurrence.
by Dutchy » Thu Dec 14, 2023 4:19 pm
dedja wrote:Would be interesting to see their actual balance sheet.
The announcement mentions net assets increasing from $17.1M in 2022 to $32.7M in 2023. The $30M Alberton redevelopment was funded by at least $23M of Federal & State government and AFL grants, plus the club received $5M above the base 2023 AFL distribution to clubs (only Gold Coast, GWS, Brisbane, North Melbourne and St Kilda received more in 2023).
How has the redevelopment been accounted for on the balance sheet? If that $30M has been accounted for, then basically the net assets are reflective of the capital grants provided to the club, but pure speculation on my part without sighting this and previous years financials (and only based on the media statement released today, no googling involved).
They’re not on their Pat Malone, but actually how sustainable is the club when you take out the welfare components?
by UK Fan » Fri Dec 15, 2023 8:45 am
carey wrote:Although i'm very disappointed in the fact i haven't heard 'Oh, now they can pay the SANFL back'
The predictability of this site has let me down on this occasion. I expect this to be a rare occurrence.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by carey » Sun Dec 17, 2023 10:25 am
by Spargo » Sun Dec 17, 2023 2:30 pm
carey wrote:Well we did single handedly prop the SANFL up for decades winning flags at will. We’d get bored and win a premiership
by UK Fan » Sun Dec 17, 2023 7:04 pm
carey wrote:Well we did single handedly prop the SANFL up for decades winning flags at will. We’d get bored and win a premiership
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Vamos » Sun Dec 17, 2023 8:13 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Dec 17, 2023 8:44 pm
Vamos wrote:That was a little subdued little fella, even a compliment in there of sorts. Expected more when I seen you were the last poster, you ok?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |