MW wrote:Koch is a salesman. Selling the future to his supporters of his club.
It's not worth worrying about!
I thought that was Boon's job?
by mots02 » Wed Dec 13, 2023 12:26 pm
MW wrote:Koch is a salesman. Selling the future to his supporters of his club.
It's not worth worrying about!
by Booney » Wed Dec 13, 2023 12:29 pm
mots02 wrote:Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:Kochie on Rozee - "once in a generation talent"
You read too much into his comments.
Its what he said... how else do you interpret that one? What else does that statement mean?
by am Bays » Wed Dec 13, 2023 12:42 pm
Booney wrote:
If you don't take his comments literally you'll be a much happier person. Trust me.
by Dutchy » Wed Dec 13, 2023 12:45 pm
by MW » Wed Dec 13, 2023 12:47 pm
Dutchy wrote:I wouldn't take his comments seriously if he wasn't in a serious position in the footy world. Im not sure Port will ever reach the summit with him in charge.
by Booney » Wed Dec 13, 2023 12:57 pm
Dutchy wrote:I wouldn't take his comments seriously if he wasn't in a serious position in the footy world. Im not sure Port will ever reach the summit with him in charge.
by whufc » Wed Dec 13, 2023 1:54 pm
Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:I wouldn't take his comments seriously if he wasn't in a serious position in the footy world. Im not sure Port will ever reach the summit with him in charge.
He's been a success with the role he's asked to do, the fact we've not got across the line in finals being linked to him is one I'd love to hear more about. Please, go on.
by Booney » Wed Dec 13, 2023 2:20 pm
by DOC » Wed Dec 13, 2023 2:35 pm
by dedja » Wed Dec 13, 2023 2:43 pm
DOC wrote:Many clubs do it but there is no such thing as a profit for a Football Club.
It is a surplus.
by mots02 » Wed Dec 13, 2023 2:53 pm
DOC wrote:Many clubs do it but there is no such thing as a profit for a Football Club.
It is a surplus.
by Dutchy » Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:00 pm
Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:I wouldn't take his comments seriously if he wasn't in a serious position in the footy world. Im not sure Port will ever reach the summit with him in charge.
He's been a success with the role he's asked to do, the fact we've not got across the line in finals being linked to him is one I'd love to hear more about. Please, go on.
by Brodlach » Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:31 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:48 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:I wouldn't take his comments seriously if he wasn't in a serious position in the footy world. Im not sure Port will ever reach the summit with him in charge.
He's been a success with the role he's asked to do, the fact we've not got across the line in finals being linked to him is one I'd love to hear more about. Please, go on.
A success in some areas, correct, but does he help them win a flag? Not so sure. He is in full control of Kenny's contract and terms as well as many of the staff that have a huge influence on the ground.
Importantly he is the spokesperson for the club and sets to tone. He is prone to saying some silly things, with his media experience he should know better.
by Wedgie » Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:50 pm
Brodlach wrote:I wonder how much is in right offs?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Brodlach » Wed Dec 13, 2023 4:51 pm
Wedgie wrote:Brodlach wrote:I wonder how much is in right offs?
Or left offs?
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by dedja » Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:46 pm
by Vamos » Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:25 pm
dedja wrote:Would be interesting to see their actual balance sheet.
The announcement mentions net assets increasing from $17.1M in 2022 to $32.7M in 2023. The $30M Alberton redevelopment was funded by at least $23M of Federal & State government and AFL grants, plus the club received $5M above the base 2023 AFL distribution to clubs (only Gold Coast, GWS, Brisbane, North Melbourne and St Kilda received more in 2023).
How has the redevelopment been accounted for on the balance sheet? If that $30M has been accounted for, then basically the net assets are reflective of the capital grants provided to the club, but pure speculation on my part without sighting this and previous years financials (and only based on the media statement released today, no googling involved).
They’re not on their Pat Malone, but actually how sustainable is the club when you take out the welfare components?
by carey » Thu Dec 14, 2023 6:51 am
by carey » Thu Dec 14, 2023 6:53 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |