by norwood8 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:24 pm
by Eagles2014 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:25 pm
RB wrote:Renshaw and Kurt Patterson are players who - for some reason - I'd like to see back in the test team eventually. But they definitely need big runs.
Renshaw obliged against the Vics.
Patterson had two failures against us. He probably wouldn't have too many chances left even for NSW on form for the last couple of seasons, even though he's still 30.
by Eagles2014 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:26 pm
norwood8 wrote:NSW copping some awful decisions from the umpires.
Anyway up the ‘Backs’!!
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:27 pm
Eagles2014 wrote:norwood8 wrote:NSW copping some awful decisions from the umpires.
Anyway up the ‘Backs’!!
The umps want early minute tomorrow too
by Armchair expert » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:28 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:29 pm
by Armchair expert » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:33 pm
by Eagles2014 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:44 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Oh boy the Gilkes decision was a stinker
by Booney » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:50 pm
by jackpot jim » Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:59 pm
by locky801 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:01 pm
by jackpot jim » Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:02 pm
Booney wrote:They need 230 runs. We need 5 wickets.
Right in the balance this one.
by Armchair expert » Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:04 pm
Eagles2014 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Oh boy the Gilkes decision was a stinker
Sangha one worse
by Booney » Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:05 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Booney wrote:They need 230 runs. We need 5 wickets.
Right in the balance this one.
In the balance ?
Reckon the odds would be something like
SA $1.06
NSW $10
But yes we are talking about the Redbacks here arnt we
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:16 pm
Close..jackpot jim wrote:Booney wrote:They need 230 runs. We need 5 wickets.
Right in the balance this one.
In the balance ?
Reckon the odds would be something like
SA $1.06
NSW $10
But yes we are talking about the Redbacks here arnt we [emoji38]
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:31 pm
by whufc » Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:32 pm
jackpot jim wrote:It's a bad era for batsmen to get hit on the pads
I've noticed for many years now umpires have been very generous in giving LBWs
Back in the 1970s, 1980s LBWs were very hard to get And you'd hardly ever get one bowling from around the wicket but these days it seems you can bowl around the wicket from as wide as possible and as long as it hits the batsman somewhere close to in front it seems you're GONE
It almost seems if umpires have been told to take the angles out of decision ,making
Umpiring isn't easy and we can all sit back in the comfort of our chairs and watch replay after replay but i feel the umpires need to find an in between balance between the 80s and recent times. Has there been a batsman this match that hasn't stood their ground for about 5 seconds in disbelief after being fired LBW ?
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Oct 17, 2023 8:13 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Off the top of my head Australia A test side
Bancroft
Renshaw
Whiteman
Hardie
McSweeney
Turner
Inglis
Neser
Steketee
Richardson
Murphy
I've probably missed a lot of people so no hate please
by The Dark Knight » Tue Oct 17, 2023 9:23 pm
by stampy » Wed Oct 18, 2023 10:12 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Queensland win smashing Victoria by an innings and 104 runs.
Vic second innings 144
Handscomb 43
Swepson 5/39
WA v Tasmania, stumps day three.
WA 6/437, trail by 2 runs
Whiteman 188
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |