by am Bays » Thu Jan 05, 2023 12:59 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 05, 2023 1:06 pm
am Bays wrote:Based on the intensity and urgency in the field by the Saffers, I think we’ve got enough now.
As we all know with the recent retirees big issues in South African cricket
This side is as bad as their 1931-32 team which got pants 5-0
by am Bays » Thu Jan 05, 2023 1:14 pm
by am Bays » Thu Jan 05, 2023 1:21 pm
by The Dark Knight » Thu Jan 05, 2023 1:58 pm
by The Dark Knight » Thu Jan 05, 2023 1:59 pm
Watch him come out and take a bag of wickets (and out perform Maharaj) since you've given him some stick.Armchair expert wrote:Could get to 350 and do an aggressive declaration
The spud will bowl Aus to victory
by Corona Man » Thu Jan 05, 2023 2:02 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:It's 2/332, Khawaja 141* and Smith 91*.
As much as I see him as a future opener for Aus and considering how well the Aus top 5 have gone in the previous 4 test matches this just shows that picking Renshaw as a specialist number 6 is a wasted just selection IMO. I was convinced Australia would go with five bowlers in this test (and backing the top 5 to make enough runs), bringing in Agar and replacing Starc with either Morris or Hazlewood. Still can't believe Boland got dropped FMD.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 05, 2023 2:06 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:It's 2/332, Khawaja 141* and Smith 91*.
As much as I see him as a future opener for Aus and considering how well the Aus top 5 have gone in the previous 4 test matches this just shows that picking Renshaw as a specialist number 6 is a wasted just selection IMO. I was convinced Australia would go with five bowlers in this test (and backing the top 5 to make enough runs), bringing in Agar and replacing Starc with either Morris or Hazlewood. Still can't believe Boland got dropped FMD.
by The Dark Knight » Thu Jan 05, 2023 2:22 pm
836 wickets @25.65 in 189 First Class matches.Corona Man wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:This Harmer fella looks like he should be vice captain of Pulteney Old Scholars 4th XI
Apparently takes a shed load of wickets in county cricket…. Which if true is a poor reflection on the standard there.
by whufc » Thu Jan 05, 2023 2:22 pm
by The Dark Knight » Thu Jan 05, 2023 2:24 pm
Corona Man wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:It's 2/332, Khawaja 141* and Smith 91*.
As much as I see him as a future opener for Aus and considering how well the Aus top 5 have gone in the previous 4 test matches this just shows that picking Renshaw as a specialist number 6 is a wasted just selection IMO. I was convinced Australia would go with five bowlers in this test (and backing the top 5 to make enough runs), bringing in Agar and replacing Starc with either Morris or Hazlewood. Still can't believe Boland got dropped FMD.
Pretty much agree here. I firmly believe the selectors have gone with a line up they are keen-ish on in preparation for India..
by whufc » Thu Jan 05, 2023 2:24 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:836 wickets @25.65 in 189 First Class matches.Corona Man wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:This Harmer fella looks like he should be vice captain of Pulteney Old Scholars 4th XI
Apparently takes a shed load of wickets in county cricket…. Which if true is a poor reflection on the standard there.
Plays for Essex in the County Championship, joined in 2016 as a Kolpak player.
2022- 59 wickets in 11 matches
2021- 53 in 14
2020- 38 in 6
2019- 83 in 14
2018- 57 in 13
2017- 72 in 15
by Armchair expert » Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:47 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
by Trader » Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:49 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:20 pm
Why would you want to bowl when rain is coming?Trader wrote:Im normally a fan of batting on and grinding teams into the ground a little bit, but today I think it's a good one for a declaration soon.
Can see the Aussies batting on til Uzzie gets his double (doesn't have one yet) or gets out, then having a crack at them tonight. 15 or so overs (depending on how quickly he gets there) seems around the mark, with the two quicks bowling most of them, resting up overnight then going again tomorrow morning (subject to rain).
by Trader » Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:24 pm
Jim05 wrote:Why would you want to bowl when rain is coming?
We will get 3 or 4 overs with a new ball and then it will be soaked. May aswell bat the day out.
by Armchair expert » Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:27 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
by Jim05 » Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:29 pm
It’s SydneyTrader wrote:Jim05 wrote:Why would you want to bowl when rain is coming?
We will get 3 or 4 overs with a new ball and then it will be soaked. May aswell bat the day out.
Its going to rain tomorrow as well.
Whenever we bowl the ball will get wet sooner or later.
I'm not saying we have to bowl tonight, but if we want the 3-0, then declaring once he gets to 200 makes some sense.
(oh, it it wasn't actually raining when I posted 30 mins ago) haha
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:48 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:08 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |