
by Pidge » Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:00 pm
by bulldogs » Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:16 pm
michael wrote:How did one guy get 10/5. Thats amazing. must be pretty good, or the team sucked. We (Fitzroy B Grade) are chasing 372 to win against Betania. I took 3/75 off 15
by Ecky » Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:29 pm
michael wrote:How did one guy get 10/5. Thats amazing. must be pretty good, or the team sucked.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Pidge » Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:54 pm
by carey18 » Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:27 pm
by mal » Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:14 pm
Ecky wrote:michael wrote:How did one guy get 10/5. Thats amazing. must be pretty good, or the team sucked.
Well, I was on the receiving end of that 10/5!![]()
![]()
It was actually the best bowling figures in 101 years of the association. The previous best was 10/22 by someone in 1932!!!![]()
He wasn't an excellent bowler - I have faced better in this same grade. It was just a mixture of:Him (Todd Edwards) bowling very well
Us having a very inexperienced side (5 were making their debut for the club, including one who had never played cricket before, and another who hadn't played for 30 years!)
Him bowling on the stumps - 6 of his last 7 wickets were all bowled
our guys got very nervous facing him and thought he was much better than he was as they knew he was on such a roll (with the inexperience playing a part again)
Their other bowler was nothing special, thus allowing him to get all 10
I gave our best batsman out caught behind when he wasn't out
If he had stayed in, we would probably have seen Edwards off, and someone else would have got a wicket or two from somewhere.
So basically, it was a freak occurance and a mixture of everything going right for him on the day!
by mal » Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:15 pm
Ecky wrote:locky801 wrote:Heard on the side that Brooklyn Park were trying to push for the lowest grade to be an over 40's comp. Did that eventuate??
Nothing about that was mentioned at the AGM, so no.
by Booney » Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:36 am
mal wrote:Ecky wrote:locky801 wrote:Heard on the side that Brooklyn Park were trying to push for the lowest grade to be an over 40's comp. Did that eventuate??
Nothing about that was mentioned at the AGM, so no.
Count me in if there is an over 40s comp
by carey » Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:10 pm
by carey » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:14 pm
by Ecky » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:33 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Pidge » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:19 pm
by Ecky » Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:53 pm
michael wrote:What happened with Rose Park forfeiting their A grade on the weekend?
On the other hand made my A grade debut for the club on the weekend and got 4*
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by locky801 » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:37 pm
carey wrote:have any of you blokes played against wingfield ? fair dinkum i'v heard of teams not paying the 50/50 decisions but they are the worst side i'v ever seen in 14 years of senior cricket at fairness we bowled 12 overs at them after making a dissapointing 180 they're 1/30 or somthing like that but should be at least 4 for or maybe even 5 for its just a shame to wreck a good game thats all and its also a shame because they've got 4 or 5 good blokes in there team including there captain .
by carey » Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:44 pm
locky801 wrote:carey wrote:have any of you blokes played against wingfield ? fair dinkum i'v heard of teams not paying the 50/50 decisions but they are the worst side i'v ever seen in 14 years of senior cricket at fairness we bowled 12 overs at them after making a dissapointing 180 they're 1/30 or somthing like that but should be at least 4 for or maybe even 5 for its just a shame to wreck a good game thats all and its also a shame because they've got 4 or 5 good blokes in there team including there captain .
Has always been rife in Church cricket funnily enough. I played for around 25 years and it was always the same, just some sides were worse at it than others
by bomber1976 » Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:58 am
by Ecky » Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:17 pm
bomber1976 wrote:Rose park had a massive wedding on and majoriy of their players attended. Apparently they were willing to play a one day match, but Adelaide Lutheran wouldnt come to the party!!
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by locky801 » Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:25 pm
by silent hour » Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:06 pm
by Ecky » Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:18 pm
silent hour wrote:The A grade asked Adelaide Lutheran if they would like to play a one day game on the first saturday but this was not agreeable by Adelaide Lutheran.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |