by Trader » Fri Nov 12, 2021 10:19 am
by whufc » Fri Nov 12, 2021 10:24 am
Trader wrote:In my journeys around the parklands I noticed a few groundsmen prepping wickets on Wednesday, then getting the covers down on Wednesday night / Thursday morning, you'd expect them to play.
Those that haven't done a lot of work early in the week might struggle.
by Trader » Fri Nov 12, 2021 10:38 am
whufc wrote:Trader wrote:In my journeys around the parklands I noticed a few groundsmen prepping wickets on Wednesday, then getting the covers down on Wednesday night / Thursday morning, you'd expect them to play.
Those that haven't done a lot of work early in the week might struggle.
Still anywhere up to 10ml to come tomorrow as well hey??
by Senor Moto Gadili » Fri Nov 12, 2021 10:48 pm
Trader wrote:whufc wrote:Trader wrote:In my journeys around the parklands I noticed a few groundsmen prepping wickets on Wednesday, then getting the covers down on Wednesday night / Thursday morning, you'd expect them to play.
Those that haven't done a lot of work early in the week might struggle.
Still anywhere up to 10ml to come tomorrow as well hey??
Expected rainfall over the next 36 hours is 3mm.
by thevoice » Sun Nov 14, 2021 12:49 am
helicopterking wrote:heater31 wrote:Nope fair play to Fulham. Show intent that they want to play aggressive cricket and win.bloods08 wrote:Just looking for others thoughts on this.
In A2 Gepps Cross v Fulham, Gepps had bowled 79 overs by 5.48 and were ready to bowl their 80th, when Fulham declared meaning Gepps had to bat for 1 over. Previously if a team got bowled out or declared after 5.30, the opposition didn’t have to bat. In my opinion this should not be happening as it doesn’t encourage teams to get through their overs quickly. If Gepps had gone the other way and bowled slowly they get fined or lose points. What makes it worse is that one of the umpires (who has been umpiring in the league for years) didn’t know the by law had changed as he doesn’t have Facebook.
What Fulham did was within the rules, but I feel is not within the spirit of the game. Just looking for others opinions.
That rule didn’t bother Fulham this week against SHOC
21/140 for the days play.
Woody Sth with another big score batting first.
by Sonofbrowny25 » Mon Nov 15, 2021 11:26 am
thevoice wrote:helicopterking wrote:heater31 wrote:Nope fair play to Fulham. Show intent that they want to play aggressive cricket and win.bloods08 wrote:Just looking for others thoughts on this.
In A2 Gepps Cross v Fulham, Gepps had bowled 79 overs by 5.48 and were ready to bowl their 80th, when Fulham declared meaning Gepps had to bat for 1 over. Previously if a team got bowled out or declared after 5.30, the opposition didn’t have to bat. In my opinion this should not be happening as it doesn’t encourage teams to get through their overs quickly. If Gepps had gone the other way and bowled slowly they get fined or lose points. What makes it worse is that one of the umpires (who has been umpiring in the league for years) didn’t know the by law had changed as he doesn’t have Facebook.
What Fulham did was within the rules, but I feel is not within the spirit of the game. Just looking for others opinions.
That rule didn’t bother Fulham this week against SHOC
21/140 for the days play.
Woody Sth with another big score batting first.
Didn’t bother your team Marion this week either. All out for under 50 and destroyed! Fulham get the reverse outright lol
by The Bedge » Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:16 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:36 pm
The Bedge wrote:Only early in the week, but forecast some significant rain on Saturday.
Been a very wet start to the year!
by The Bedge » Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:46 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:We are at the mercy of the negative Indian Ocean dipole.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:53 pm
The Bedge wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:We are at the mercy of the negative Indian Ocean dipole.
It'll be interesting to see if conditions remain neutral, or if a La Nina develops.
by tigerpie » Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:48 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sat Nov 20, 2021 10:03 pm
tigerpie wrote:Wet tracks up north?
Marion in all sorts and pooraka losing early wickets. (Hanson hasn't batted yet).
by tigerpie » Sat Nov 20, 2021 10:48 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:tigerpie wrote:Wet tracks up north?
Marion in all sorts and pooraka losing early wickets. (Hanson hasn't batted yet).
3 to 4mm overnight and poor drying conditions didn't help. Marion had the Hornets in a spot of bother at 8 for 97, but they scrambled to 148 on the back of a solid 63 from Curtis Wordsworth, who batted at 8. What a luxury!. The Marion bats were like rabbits in the headlights .... 7 for 19 off 29 overs.
Remarkable performance by Nathan Fox in A2. Took 8 for 18 including the last 4 wickets in 4 balls.
by Harry49 » Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:31 am
tigerpie wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:tigerpie wrote:Wet tracks up north?
Marion in all sorts and pooraka losing early wickets. (Hanson hasn't batted yet).
3 to 4mm overnight and poor drying conditions didn't help. Marion had the Hornets in a spot of bother at 8 for 97, but they scrambled to 148 on the back of a solid 63 from Curtis Wordsworth, who batted at 8. What a luxury!. The Marion bats were like rabbits in the headlights .... 7 for 19 off 29 overs.
Remarkable performance by Nathan Fox in A2. Took 8 for 18 including the last 4 wickets in 4 balls.
Wasn't it covered overnight?
by no_remorse28 » Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:21 am
Harry49 wrote:tigerpie wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:tigerpie wrote:Wet tracks up north?
Marion in all sorts and pooraka losing early wickets. (Hanson hasn't batted yet).
3 to 4mm overnight and poor drying conditions didn't help. Marion had the Hornets in a spot of bother at 8 for 97, but they scrambled to 148 on the back of a solid 63 from Curtis Wordsworth, who batted at 8. What a luxury!. The Marion bats were like rabbits in the headlights .... 7 for 19 off 29 overs.
Remarkable performance by Nathan Fox in A2. Took 8 for 18 including the last 4 wickets in 4 balls.
Wasn't it covered overnight?
Pitch was covered when it was still slightly damp. Delayed start due to the surrounds.
The pitch was a little sticky, most wickets in Para Hills innings were due to going through a drive to early. I think 7 of the 10 wickets were caught between cover and mid-on. For most parts of the day it was good swinging conditions, lots of movement around.
by Trader » Mon Nov 22, 2021 11:30 am
tigerpie wrote:Wet tracks up north?
Marion in all sorts and pooraka losing early wickets. (Hanson hasn't batted yet).
by Sonofbrowny25 » Mon Nov 22, 2021 11:39 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Nov 22, 2021 11:46 am
no_remorse28 wrote:Gee whiz that Rollings bowled well it seemed
by The Bedge » Mon Nov 22, 2021 2:26 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:Gee whiz that Rollings bowled well it seemed
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Under_Scrutiny » Fri Nov 26, 2021 11:26 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |