by Baron Greenback » Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:31 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:36 pm
by Baron Greenback » Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:43 pm
by hazed » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:53 pm
by Baron Greenback » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:57 pm
by cod master » Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:10 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:01 pm
by bertie » Tue Sep 25, 2007 4:35 pm
crushinator wrote:he got 3. evidence was produced by BMFC that shows the umpires evidence was flawed and incorrect yet he still gets 3. im not saying he shouldnt have been done. im still waiting to see footage, But if the club can produce hard evidence, and it was hard, that the umpire wasnt telling the truth why 3 weeks? seems like the RFL, again, have decided its a bad injury (as umpires always do on the field) someone has to pay in a big way. my understanding of the incident was the "victim" was trying to rough up the "attacker" all day and in the moments before it happened did something foolish.
by Dogwatcher » Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:23 pm
by hazed » Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:51 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:38 pm
by hazed » Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:31 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:36 pm
by hazed » Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:38 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:39 pm
by southern fan » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:51 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:57 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:58 pm
by hazed » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:02 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |