Negative defensive footy cure?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby gazzamagoo » Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:14 am

I had an epipheny this morning, may be a way to promote higher scoring & more exciting footy.
Every goal per team over 3 goals per quarter is awarded 9 points,
therefore if a team kicks 6 goals in a quarter it equals 45 points instead of 36 points.
Thoughts?
gazzamagoo
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:48 pm
Has liked: 1752 times
Been liked: 700 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby Booney » Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:24 am

My first thought is, how early did Gaz start drinking?
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 59683
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7729 times
Been liked: 11203 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby gazzamagoo » Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:28 am

Booney wrote:My first thought is, how early did Gaz start drinking?

When I was about 11 I think.
gazzamagoo
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:48 pm
Has liked: 1752 times
Been liked: 700 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby Pseudo » Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:43 am

Image
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12065
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1609 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby whufc » Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:51 am

I actually the love the idea of bonus points for goals scored especially at SANFL level where all games are played outdoor.

I would be keeping it simple just like the super rugby comp, at the end of the game 10 goals equals 1 extra point and 15 equals two extra points, or what ever goal total you desire I just used them for arguments sake.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27968
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5707 times
Been liked: 2632 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby Pag » Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:04 am

Not a fan of this sort of thing. Disadvantages teams who end up getting more wet weather games than others.

Super Netball (completely different sport, I know) had a two-point goal available for the last five mins of each quarter or something. Made no sense to me why the first goal of the quarter should be worth less than one that comes with four minutes to go.

I know we don't want the game to be like soccer, but there is a bit to take out of the fact that soccer changes its rules less than almost other sport going around.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5435
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 506 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby The Bedge » Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:07 am

Limit the number of people who can be in the 50 at each time.. or make a full forward required to stay full forward - like netball the GS and GK cant leave the 1st third.. have the FF and FB cant leave the 50.

I wanna see power forwards kicking bags again.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
The Bedge
Coach
 
 
Posts: 16819
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:28 pm
Location: BarbeeCueAria
Has liked: 3225 times
Been liked: 4148 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby amber_fluid » Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:15 am

The Bedge wrote:Limit the number of people who can be in the 50 at each time.. or make a full forward required to stay full forward - like netball the GS and GK cant leave the 1st third.. have the FF and FB cant leave the 50.

I wanna see power forwards kicking bags again.


I like this idea.
Bit hard to score when your FF pushes up to the flank or even the wings.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14215
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:18 am
Has liked: 2272 times
Been liked: 2623 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby whufc » Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:21 am

The Bedge wrote:Limit the number of people who can be in the 50 at each time.. or make a full forward required to stay full forward - like netball the GS and GK cant leave the 1st third.. have the FF and FB cant leave the 50.

I wanna see power forwards kicking bags again.


I like the concept but think in practicality it would be a nightmare as a spectator.

Imagine watching your full forward kick a great snap goal, you start celebrating only to see the middle umpire running into the forward line to call a free kick against, something that you would not have picked up watching,

Even worse with the use of technology we would see very goal reviewed for how many players were in the forward line.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27968
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5707 times
Been liked: 2632 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby Blacky » Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:51 am

how about we leave the game alone
Current image:
Maximum dimensions; width: 100 pixels, height: 100 pixels, file size: 20.51 KiB
The avatar functionality is currently DISABLED.
Blacky
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Front bar at WESTIES
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 44 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:17 pm

The best cure for crap football game plans is they dont play finals or win premierships
Norwood in 2020 is a good example
Their 3 best kick getters were on their half back line - kicking to each other until they muffed it and turned it over
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14512
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 769 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby gadj1976 » Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:51 pm

The Bedge wrote:Limit the number of people who can be in the 50 at each time.. or make a full forward required to stay full forward - like netball the GS and GK cant leave the 1st third.. have the FF and FB cant leave the 50.

I wanna see power forwards kicking bags again.


You'll need 15 umpires to police it.

Just think - it's bad enough now when a whistle blows and no one knows what's going on. It'd be chaos.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9149
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 781 times
Been liked: 846 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby amber_fluid » Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:34 pm

gazzamagoo wrote:
Booney wrote:My first thought is, how early did Gaz start drinking?

When I was about 11 I think.


Late start for a central supporter
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14215
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:18 am
Has liked: 2272 times
Been liked: 2623 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby gazzamagoo » Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:42 pm

amber_fluid wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
Booney wrote:My first thought is, how early did Gaz start drinking?

When I was about 11 I think.


Late start for a central supporter

Sorry, I was in jail :D
gazzamagoo
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:48 pm
Has liked: 1752 times
Been liked: 700 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby MatteeG » Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:47 pm

We dont need rule changes, just a coach ballsy enough to leave a player or 2 at home when the ball is up the other end.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:36 pm
Has liked: 519 times
Been liked: 510 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby gazzamagoo » Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:28 pm

Blacky wrote:how about we leave the game alone

because it's BORING
gazzamagoo
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:48 pm
Has liked: 1752 times
Been liked: 700 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby whybother » Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:46 pm

Just pointing out that Eagles were the best attack and the best defence this year
whybother
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:16 am
Has liked: 111 times
Been liked: 106 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby goddy11 » Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 pm

We could just weaken the bottom 4 sides so the top 4 teams score more heavily. Problem solved. I sure the coaches at the lower 4 teams would be happy with this.

What a stupid argument. The game is fine. I want to see even contests (with my side winning btw). A lot of the recent AFL rule changes have been made on gut feeling and have changed the fabric of the game.
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:35 pm
Has liked: 605 times
Been liked: 214 times
Grassroots Team: Myponga-Sellicks

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby DOC » Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:44 pm

If goals were worth 12 points and behinds 2 points, would that help?
User avatar
DOC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18584
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:15 pm
Has liked: 789 times
Been liked: 2191 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:39 pm

gazzamagoo wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
Booney wrote:My first thought is, how early did Gaz start drinking?

When I was about 11 I think.


Late start for a central supporter

Sorry, I was in jail :D


=))

Mrs Jimmy just asked what was so funny
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14512
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 769 times
Been liked: 1171 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |